As pointed out by @mkienenb in his answer at StackOverflow[here
http://stackoverflow.com/a/18700523/530153], during the above profiling
test I excluded the org.apache.myfaces methods, so I did a fresh profiling
test & I'm posting below the new result snapshot.
[image: enter image description here]
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Anton Gavazuk
wrote:
>
>
> So this method is actually wrapping up all underlying processing: jsf
> actions, business services, interaction with db - thus its time is always
> the biggest
>
Nope the *self time* of this method that I am talking about, refers to
ju
I was just trying out some profiling experiments with my JSF project using
Netbeans based Profiler. However I found a very surprising results. I found
JSF's *FacesServlet.service()* method to be consuming most of the time
while requests were being served. I do serve content from databases into my
J
t; > If we were to vote again today, I would be strongly in favor of using
> > SL4J as the logging mechanism.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Ertio Lew wrote:
> >> Why doesn't Myfaces allows the flexibility to plug in your desired
> loggi
Why doesn't Myfaces allows the flexibility to plug in your desired logging
SL4J implementation instead of restricting users to JUL/ Commons logging or
otherwise incurring the overheads of using bridgeHandlers etc ?!
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Did you ever say some
5 matches
Mail list logo