Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-31 Thread Adam Winer
Ah, I see. You're using server state saving, so using the underlying JSF implementation to save state. The Trinidad StateManager (used for client state saving) doesn't use colons. -- Adam On 5/30/07, D. Cardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking at the StateManagerImpl class of the

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread Luka Surija
and, all fixed issues in 1.0.1 are also fixed in 1.2? Adam Winer wrote: If you're using JSF 1.2, it is more stable. -- Adam On 5/29/07, Luka Surija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How stable is Trinidad 1.2 comparing with 1.0.1? Luka Adam Winer wrote: The Trinidad 1.2 code sends

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
once in a while, there is a new branch created for the JSF 1.2 stuff that get's all trunk fixed bugs in it. -M On 5/30/07, Luka Surija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and, all fixed issues in 1.0.1 are also fixed in 1.2? Adam Winer wrote: If you're using JSF 1.2, it is more stable. -- Adam On

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread Luka Surija
Now, I've tried trinidad 1.2 and 1.0.1 but both of them have same error with decimal separator sign - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-427 (yes, client decimal number validator is still broken since m1-incubating version). But now I get different error. There is no popup alert

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread D. Cardon
Adam, Thanks for the info! Since I'm using the trunk, the org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE is what needs to be sent (at least, that's what's listed in my CoreResponseStateManager class). So, I now have the GWT request send that variable set to its component's id. I.e., the GWT widget

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread Adam Winer
That doesn't sound right - we don't expect a colon at all in the state token. What line of code are you looking at? -- Adam On 5/30/07, D. Cardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam, Thanks for the info! Since I'm using the trunk, the org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE is what needs to be

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-30 Thread D. Cardon
I was looking at the StateManagerImpl class of the com.sun.faces.application package, line number 116 in jsf-impl-1.2_03. It seems like it uses a ':' separator character in restoring the view... Anyway, it turns out I was able to get it working anyway. After looking at the HTML generated,

[Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread D. Cardon
Hi all, I'm using MyFaces Trinidad and am integrating the Google Web Toolkit (GWT) to work along with it. I am using the G4JSF project along with some of my own modifications. So far, everything on the client side is working just fine, but I am having difficulty communicating with the server

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread Adam Winer
If there's no tree, I suspect that the state parameter is not getting submitted. Check the G4JSF code to see if it has hardcoded a list of request parameters to submit. -- Adam On 5/29/07, D. Cardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm using MyFaces Trinidad and am integrating the Google

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread D. Cardon
Thanks for your response, I looked into it and found out that when G4JSF builds its request, it send the javax.faces.ViewState variable in the request. Do I need to have it send something different for Trinidad? --David --- Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there's no tree, I suspect

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread Adam Winer
The Trinidad 1.2 code sends javax.faces.ViewState (the 1.2 spec requires this), but the trunk doesn't, instead sending org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE. If you're using JSF 1.2, you could (and should) use the Trinidad 1.2 code. -- Adam On 5/29/07, D. Cardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread Luka Surija
How stable is Trinidad 1.2 comparing with 1.0.1? Luka Adam Winer wrote: The Trinidad 1.2 code sends javax.faces.ViewState (the 1.2 spec requires this), but the trunk doesn't, instead sending org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE. If you're using JSF 1.2, you could (and should) use the

Re: [Trinidad] GWT Integration

2007-05-29 Thread Adam Winer
If you're using JSF 1.2, it is more stable. -- Adam On 5/29/07, Luka Surija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How stable is Trinidad 1.2 comparing with 1.0.1? Luka Adam Winer wrote: The Trinidad 1.2 code sends javax.faces.ViewState (the 1.2 spec requires this), but the trunk doesn't, instead