. Otherwise we will end up with
unmaintainable CODI sources.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Ing.Thomas Kernstock t.kernst...@e-technologies.at wrote:
From: Ing.Thomas Kernstock t.kernst...@e-technologies.at
Subject: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
To: 'MyFaces Discussion' users
in OUR source again. Otherwise we will end up with
unmaintainable CODI sources.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Ing.Thomas Kernstock t.kernst...@e-technologies.at
wrote:
From: Ing.Thomas Kernstock t.kernst...@e-technologies.at
Subject: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up
...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 10:26 AM
hi mark,
it would be nice if we don't need workarounds for weld.
however, we already
it should just work,
then please file a jira issue against OWB too - txs!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 5/21/11, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
To: MyFaces
the only
chance for my project.
regards
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de]
Gesendet: Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 12:01
An: MyFaces Discussion
Betreff: Re: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
I'm not really conviced that we should implement
but in the moment the only
chance for my project.
regards
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de]
Gesendet: Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 12:01
An: MyFaces Discussion
Betreff: Re: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
I'm not really conviced that we
Danke sehr vielmals :-)
lg
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 21. Mai 2011 20:07
An: MyFaces Discussion
Betreff: Re: AW: CODI @ViewAccessScoped not cleaned up?
hi @ all,
as mentioned before:
workaround
Hi Gerhard,
I Think you are right - this problem exists either since Codi 0.9.4 or
Glassfish3.1(Weld 1.1.1). This explains why I see extra database updates (in
my logfiles) of entities that should have been destroyed allready. On
Glassfish 3.0.1 with CODI 0.9.3 this worked fine !
best regards
that's what I expected :-) The chances that weld causes the problem where
rather huge (as we discussed earlier).
have a good one
thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Mai 2011 21:08
An: MyFaces Discussion
9 matches
Mail list logo