Re: DEFAULT_SUFFIX question again

2006-03-18 Thread Laurie Harper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so it turns out I can't use *.jsf as the file extension if I am already using for the filter stuff to go to Faces Servlet. What is bizarre though is when I start using *.faces as my filter and *.jsf as my file extension, MyFaces sends back jsp:root and stuff to the

DEFAULT_SUFFIX question again

2006-03-17 Thread dean
so it turns out I can't use *.jsf as the file extension if I am already using for the filter stuff to go to Faces Servlet. What is bizarre though is when I start using *.faces as my filter and *.jsf as my file extension, MyFaces sends back jsp:root and stuff to the browser instead of changing

Re: DEFAULT_SUFFIX question again

2006-03-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger
No, but why not use .jspx as your file extension? Perhaps the container only knows how to compile the jsp files properly if you're using that naming scheme. I don't use JSP, so this is all speculation. I did successfully use jspx files for a short time a year ago before I moved on to facelets,

Re: DEFAULT_SUFFIX question again

2006-03-17 Thread dean
actually yes, I am now set up with a jspx extension and jsf to servlet mapping. I just thought faces to jsf was a little more clear. From what I understand jspx is just an xml jsp file, not necessarily a jsf jsp file so I thought *.jsf would be much more clear. This is just from my experiences