Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread simon
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 19:14 +0200, Anton Gavazuk wrote: I have project based on JSF 1.1 (MyFaces), Tiles and Tomahawk (1.1.5) I think about migration to JSF 1.2 and adding some new features and somehow to move my layouts subsystem to another system. How you consider - Facelets + MYFaces

Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread Anton Gavazuk
Simon, what you know and think about layouts in Facelets? 2008/1/4, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 19:14 +0200, Anton Gavazuk wrote: I have project based on JSF 1.1 (MyFaces), Tiles and Tomahawk (1.1.5) I think about migration to JSF 1.2 and adding some new features and

Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread simon
Layouts? You mean the composition stuff? I think it is very nice. It is also much like Tiles. And as you note below, you are already using tiles with JSF. I believe that recent additions to tomahawk improve tiles support in JSF even further. Note that I haven't used tiles+jsf together myself.

Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread Anton Gavazuk
Hmm, good idea about comparison... I will try. But what I don't like in tiles - separate config, in Stripes ( action-based framework) you just define layout in one JSP and in any particular page just substitute some components in base layout - as for me very good approach, you don't have to

Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The layout in Facelets is similar (if you got your last comment right) foo.xhtml: ui:composition xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:ui=http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets; ... template=WEB-INF/masterLayout.xhtml ui:define name=menu blah... this overrides the menu... /ui:define

Re: Facelet Question

2008-01-04 Thread simon
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 22:31 +0200, Anton Gavazuk wrote: Hmm, good idea about comparison... I will try. But what I don't like in tiles - separate config, in Stripes ( action-based framework) you just define layout in one JSP and in any particular page just substitute some components in base

RE: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Kito D. Mann
Converting to Facelets is pretty painless, since the syntax is standard XML and it uses the same tags as JSP. If your old project warrants new development, I’d go for it. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action

RE: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Simon Kitching
Or just upgrade to JSF1.2 and stay with JSP. JSF1.1+Facelets is vastly superior to JSF1.1+JSP. But I don't see any major difference between JSF1.2+facelets and JSF1.2+JSP+tomahawk+tiles2 Or is there something I've missed? Regards, Simon Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:

RE: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Carlos Adolfo Ortiz Quiros
: MyFaces Discussion Asunto: RE: Facelet Question Or just upgrade to JSF1.2 and stay with JSP. JSF1.1+Facelets is vastly superior to JSF1.1+JSP. But I don't see any major difference between JSF1.2+facelets and JSF1.2+JSP+tomahawk+tiles2 Or is there something I've missed? Regards, Simon

Re: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On a related note, the JBoss plugins for Eclipse now provide autocomplete etc for Facelets pages..thanks JBoss! I think the Eclipse folks are working on that as well! Regards, Simon -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions:

RE: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread simon
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 11:38 -0500, Carlos Adolfo Ortiz Quiros wrote: Quite interesting. In which position is Tomahawk library with JSF versions? The company I work for has several applications in production right now with Myfaces1.2 + tomahawk. Why do you mention JSF1.2+facelets and

RE: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Kito D. Mann
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:01 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: Facelet Question On a related note, the JBoss plugins for Eclipse now provide autocomplete etc

Re: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On Dec 6, 2007 11:23 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I don't see any major difference between JSF1.2+facelets and JSF1.2+JSP+tomahawk+tiles2 Or is there something I've missed? Error reporting is vastly superior when you stop using jsp. Facelets is also significantly

Re: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Luka Surija
Kito D. Mann wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:01 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: Facelet Question On a related note, the JBoss plugins for Eclipse now provide

Re: Facelet Question

2007-12-06 Thread Bruno Aranda
And IntelliJ 7 On 07/12/2007, Luka Surija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kito D. Mann wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:01 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: Facelet