Re: zip file distribution?

2005-03-09 Thread Martin Bosak
ust rename the file; giving it a .tgz exension and everything is OK. Marty - Original Message - From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MyFaces Discussion" Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:27 AM Subject: Re: zip file distribution? You mean as oppose

Re: zip file distribution?

2005-03-09 Thread Sean Schofield
Message - > From: "Doug Ly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MyFaces Discussion" ; "Sean > Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:00 PM > Subject: RE: zip file distribution? > > > Use 7-Zip. It should take

Re: zip file distribution?

2005-03-09 Thread Jonathan Eric Miller
ot;Doug Ly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MyFaces Discussion" ; "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:00 PM Subject: RE: zip file distribution? Use 7-Zip. It should take care of everything. --Doug -Original Message- From

RE: zip file distribution?

2005-03-09 Thread Doug Ly
Use 7-Zip. It should take care of everything. --Doug -Original Message- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:27 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: zip file distribution? You mean as opposed to tar.gz? The .tar.gz is just a unix thing

Re: zip file distribution?

2005-03-09 Thread Sean Schofield
You mean as opposed to tar.gz? The .tar.gz is just a unix thing. Most zip utilities for Windows can handle it (WinAce and RAR both do.) Eventually we should probably consider supporting .zip though. sean On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:16:23 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does