Hi Adam,
I'm having difficulty running the latest version of Seam under glassfish:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050702
Is there a simple Trinidad 1.2 project that I can download for Eclipse? I
can start with that and add Ajax4Jsf then Seam.
Cheers,
Chris.
On 5/
If I set CACHE_VIEW_ROOT to false the problem goes away.
On 5/31/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I take it back - it's now even stranger!
First click that fires validation works. Click again and the duplication
starts happening as before.
On 5/31/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I take it back - it's now even stranger!
First click that fires validation works. Click again and the duplication
starts happening as before.
On 5/31/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just done an update to my environment:
Update to latest Ajax4Jsf snapshot from
http://maven.ex
I've just done an update to my environment:
Update to latest Ajax4Jsf snapshot from
http://maven.exadel.com/org/ajax4jsf/ajax4jsf/
Update to latest Seam snapshot (CVS) and reconfigured filters in-line with
new version (many of the Seam filters + Ajax4Jsf have been rolled into one);
Changed ALTERN
Well, we've got a lot of variables here. It's a little
suspicious to me hearing that an Ajax4JSF filter is
now required, when this behavior doesn't appear to
be reproducing for other users of Trinidad 1.2.
I'd try, for example, the same page without Ajax4JSF
installed - if that means taking Seam
I tried with USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE=false, but it made no difference.
On 5/30/07, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah I just saw that, I am trying to reproduce your error now.
BTW, I get the same error
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 4,Size: 4
when running the example
Yeah I just saw that, I am trying to reproduce your error now.
BTW, I get the same error
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 4,Size: 4
when running the example.
-Brian
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also have an entry on the JBoss forum:
http://www.jboss.com/in
LOL, I guess I don't pay attention to who is replying sometimes. Thanks
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL - I'd already replied to that! I'll give your suggestion a try and
shall take a fresh look at your post...
Cheers,
Chris.
(aka lowecg2004)
On 5/30/07, Brian Smith
I also have an entry on the JBoss forum:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4049845#4049845
My post has details of a repro case based on some minor mods to the
Seam-Discs example.
Cheers,
C.
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL - I'd already replied t
LOL - I'd already replied to that! I'll give your suggestion a try and
shall take a fresh look at your post...
Cheers,
Chris.
(aka lowecg2004)
On 5/30/07, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just thinking of the USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE context parameter in
web.xml. This can ca
I was just thinking of the USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE context parameter in
web.xml. This can cache view state and the Trinidad Dev guide says it can
cause some unexpected behavior in rare cases. Make sure you have this set
to False (good for development anyway).
I am currently having trouble mi
Brian - I'm not sure how to test for this, did you have anything in mind?
Adam - are you familiar with the "Seam-Discs" Trinidad example?
http://pmuir.bleepbleep.org.uk/2007/04/seamdiscs-jboss-seam-and-apache.html
I have made a minor mod to this and can reproduce the behaviour.
Cheers,
Chris
Just an off the wall guess, but this couldn't be some sort of goofy caching
issue?
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anything I can do to help narrow this down?
On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish! I
Is there anything I can do to help narrow this down?
On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish! I
didn't know they were using the RI. So scrap that theory!
It still *might* be something wrong in JBoss (maybe their
implementation of Js
Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish! I
didn't know they were using the RI. So scrap that theory!
It still *might* be something wrong in JBoss (maybe their
implementation of JspIdConsumer in the JSP engine?),
but this is more puzzling.
-- Adam
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROT
Thanks for the reply Adam.
Do you happen to know what version of JSF Glassfish is using?
From jsf-api.jar that is with JBoss 4.2.0.GA, the manifest states:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Specification-Title: JavaServer Faces
Created-By: 1.5.0_04-b05 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.
I suspect that there's something wrong with
the implementation of JSF 1.2 used by JBoss, probably
in that implementation's UIComponentClassicTagBase
code or something similar. The behavior you're describing
doesn't occur with Glassfish.
-- Adam
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a project that is running Trinidad and I recently upgraded to JBoss
4.2.0.GA. As part of this upgrade I also migrated to JSF 1.2 (the latest
Seam version requires me to do this). Ever since then, whenever I submit a
form that fails validation, the form renders the correct validati
18 matches
Mail list logo