Re: javascript error jsf is not defined

Hi Jakob, I guess I use the built-in facelets. At least this is the code from faces-config: view-handler com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler /view-handler Matthias Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:53:11 +0200 Von: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com An:

Re: javascript error jsf is not defined

Am 07.04.10 08:14, schrieb Matthias Leis: Hi Jakob, I guess I use the built-in facelets. At least this is the code from faces-config: view-handler com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler /view-handler Wrong view handler... the jsf2 one is not under com.sun, but under

Re: Missing/changed methods after migrating to MyFaces 1.2.8

Am 06.04.10 13:19, schrieb Seema Mani: hi, I'm facing a few issues after migrating to MyFaces 1.2.8 from MyFaces 1.1.7 1. In my custom tag handler class, extending HtmlMessageTag, there were calls to setStringProperty method in the superclass. But these methods are not existing now 2. In my

Re: Loading Gif Animated While Loading A Jsf Page

Thanks for the suggestions! Have a nice day, Vale -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Loading-Gif-Animated-While-Loading-A-Jsf-Page-tp28117980p28162529.html Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

WG: [Trinidad] Trinidad 1.2.13 shortcomings: create bug track entries for them?

Hi, Reposted this as I think I got the wrong end of the mailing list for this issue..;) Recently we tried to update from 1.2.9 to 1.2.13 -btw we were testing the releases in between and they seemed ok- and now it looks as if we were stuck with this version. Because of the following effects, our

Re: Loading Gif Animated While Loading A Jsf Page

Mike, Adrian, could you show your approaches in an example? 2010/4/7 vale_java_dev fabrizi_valent...@yahoo.it Thanks for the suggestions! Have a nice day, Vale -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Loading-Gif-Animated-While-Loading-A-Jsf-Page-tp28117980p28162529.html

Re: javascript error jsf is not defined

You are right about the view handler. I forgot that JSF2 doesn't need afaces-config anymore. But I need it anyway for registering a phase listener. Anyway, if I remove the view handler from the faces-config, all I get from my webapp is a blank page and no errors. Do I have to define a

Re: javascript error jsf is not defined

Hi, In JSF 2.0 you don't have to configure a view handler. It will decide whether to use the new Facelets- or the JSP-ViewDeclarationLanguage in the default ViewHandlerImpl. Regards, Jakob 2010/4/7 Matthias Leis matthias.l...@gmx.net You are right about the view handler. I forgot that JSF2

Re: Loading Gif Animated While Loading A Jsf Page

Unfortunately, I cannot. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Anton Gavazuk antongava...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, Adrian, could you show your approaches in an example? 2010/4/7 vale_java_dev fabrizi_valent...@yahoo.it Thanks for the suggestions! Have a nice day, Vale -- View this message in

Trinidad 1.2.13: another upgrade problem: UINodePropertyKey unserializable

Hi, Yet another problem here when trying to upgrade to 1.2.13: Certain tr:commandLink within a Trinidad table that are supposed to lead to Trinidad popup dialog show the dialog but the application crashes shortly thereafter with the log you can see attached below. In 1.2.9 this used to

Re: Trinidad 1.2.13: another upgrade problem: UINodePropertyKey unserializable

hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1245 introduced some improvements in the direction of not sticking illegal stuff into the session. (during that we also introduced those error messages: * !-- UNSERIALIZABLE_PROPERTY_VALUE_NO_CONTAINER -- resource

Antwort: Re: Trinidad 1.2.13: another upgrade problem: UINodePropertyKey unserializable

Hi, Thanks again for the info. I will try to find out more by setting CHECK_STATE_SERIALIZATION which in this case, as far as I understood, should be the right approach, should not it? The problem seems to be with the SortableModel object and the applied UINodePropertyKey. Best wishes

Re: javascript error jsf is not defined

Actually afaik you still need a faces-config, but in many cases it can be left blank or you just have a few lines of xml because you wont have too many artifacts anymore which still need xml registration. Most of the day to day stuff is now annotations. But there are exceptions, which is a

RE: [TRINIDAD] Family and component type for SelectRangeChoiceRenderer

Carsten, I am working on a similar problem, can you please post your xml addition to the faces-config.xml that get the renderer to see you renderKit? Thanks, Keith Carsten Pieper wrote: If anyone is interested, here's the solution to the problem. I did exactly what Harald advised

Re: Facing error after Richfaces upgarde.

The id is for your richfaces component. My suggestion would be to either try downgrading richfaces or upgrading ONLY richfaces and nothing else to determine if it's only caused by richfaces. On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, nilakandan.v...@cognizant.com wrote: All,     I'm getting the