changed the contents
of the cache.
-Original Message-
From: Koji Kawamura
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 7:11 PM
To: users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Implementing Gates with the Wait and Notify Processors
Hi Shawn,
I have done similar flow before, using Wait/Notify processors
when things are clustered.
Thanks
Shawn
From: Bryan Bende
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 9:25 AM
To: users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Implementing Gates with the Wait and Notify Processors
I think the Wait/Notify processors may have changed a bit since I last
used
through that don’t match the
>> Target Signal Count. For example if the target signal count is 1 then it’s
>> letting things through that have a target signal count of 2? I’ve got to be
>> missing something rather obvious.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
&g
got
> to be missing something rather obvious.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Shawn
>
>
>
> *From:* Shawn Weeks
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2019 8:32 PM
> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
> *Subject:* Implementing Gates with the Wait and Notify Processors
>
>
>
Hi Shawn,
I think it's a hard question to answer in the general sense. A lot depends
on your specific implementation. What are you using to originate your flow?
Is it a GenerateFlowFile processor, a List, or something else? There are a
couple of different strategies that I've discovered for
I'm working to implement a flow where for a given source of data I can only be
processing one set at a time due to external dependencies. Each set needs to go
through several different steps so this isn't just a matter of limiting
concurrency for a single processor. I'm trying to implement this
