Craig L Russell wrote:
Database users are notorious for wanting stability, even if it means
running back-level releases. Somehow they manage to coerce vendors into
supporting them on their running systems.
To get an accurate idea of our users' requirements, perhaps we need to
include
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:11:48 -0400
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
But it's also clear that OpenJPA 2.0 will require Java 6. So I have
no issues with making the switch for 2.0.
Agree. I'd like us to require Java SE 6 for build and runtime.
Agree.
But is it a problem
+1
Java 5 for 1.0.x and 1.3.x
Java 6 for 2.x
I think this could better for OpenJPA adoption.
Concerning my own usage, I'm no more using Java 5 ... so I would be
pleased with everything Java 6.
On Aug 6, 2009, at 16:11 , Donald Woods wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Database users are
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Re%3A--DISCUSS--Drop-build-support-for-Java-5--tp3393970p3395032.html
Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
