On 08/17/2007 11:56 PM, KAMI wrote:
> Ooo-build always differs from original OOo. Many Linux distributor use
> ooo-build for creaíing OpenOffice.org.
>
> Here is a apply file that could draw the differences:
>
> http://svn.gnome.org/svn/ooo-build/trunk/patches/src680/apply
>
> KAMI
>
Cool! Th
Ooo-build always differs from original OOo. Many Linux distributor use
ooo-build for creaíing OpenOffice.org.
Here is a apply file that could draw the differences:
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/ooo-build/trunk/patches/src680/apply
KAMI
jonathon írta:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NoOp wrote:
> Lotus WordPro Document (*.lwp)
> Microsoft Works Document (*.wps)
> [the .wps in OOo Official is for WPS 2000/Office 1.0 which is a Chinese
> word processor)
Thanks for the list.
a) Isn't the code in their Diff file?
b) Can't the code b
On 08/16/2007 09:43 PM, jonathon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> NoOp wrote:
>
>> On the otherhand, the Ubuntu version includes some added filters that OOo
>> Official does not. If you try to find how
>> Ubuntu added the filters and try to add them, they can't be fou