Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-28 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Using native installers was a goal so that the installer cobbled together for the 1.1.x releases did not have to be maintained. It proved to be problematic with the way it sucked resources. So, I guess the question is Who can we get to maintain

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-28 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 06:13 -0700, Rich Shepard wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Using native installers was a goal so that the installer cobbled together for the 1.1.x releases did not have to be maintained. It proved to be problematic with the way it sucked

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-28 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: I can understand your situation. I was hoping that you had the resources. Too bad you do not. Maybe someone else who would like to see the old installer back will read our exchange and step in. I guess that is the best we can expect. I'll

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-28 Thread Bill Wells
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:35, Rich Shepard wrote: Check out http://www.linuxpackages.net/pkg_details.php?id=7951. I downloaded the Slackware pkg and installed it with pkgtool and it even gives you Openofficeorg on your KDE Desktop. Bill Wells Recently I downloaded the huge tarball

[users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-27 Thread Rich Shepard
Recently I downloaded the huge tarball for 2.0 and today I tried to install it. Unfortunately, the installation directory has nothing but RPMs, and that does no good on a Slackware system. Up through 1.1.5, the linux/English download provided a distribution-agnostic installation directory.

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-27 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Get the setup guide. Link is on www.openoffice.org or from the project in my sig. OK. It must be quite different from earlier versions, then. Rich -- Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President | Author of Quantifying Environmental Applied

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-27 Thread Jacqueline McNally
Rich Shepard wrote: Recently I downloaded the huge tarball for 2.0 and today I tried to install it. Unfortunately, the installation directory has nothing but RPMs, and that does no good on a Slackware system. Up through 1.1.5, the linux/English download provided a distribution-agnostic

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-27 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Jacqueline McNally wrote: Eugenio posted to the webmistress today: ---///--- To let you know that a package for the Slackware Linux distribution exists for OpenOffice 2.0 in English. It is available on http://www.linuxpackeges.net I have tested it and it works fine, you

Re: [users] 2.0 For Linux

2005-10-27 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Get the setup guide. Link is on www.openoffice.org or from the project in my sig. Huh! Just out of curiosity, what was broken with the installation procedures used from pre-1.0 through 1.1.5? I don't mind using rpm2tgz as long as it