My experience with WinXP/SP3, Intel CoreDuo 2GhZ, 4Gb Ram, is that it is
faster than 3.1, but it is very crash prone at the point of saving a file
at least in OOW... which is not good, not to mention a big waste of time.
Now in most all cases I was able to recover the files, but sofar
On 2010-02-14 4:22 PM, David B Teague wrote:
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even
a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
Seems to be *much* faster than 3.1.1, and I haven't run into
2010/2/14 David B Teague davidbtea...@verizon.net
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and that
it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even a URL to
an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had
Don’t overlook the most important difference of all: Openoffice now (at
last) reads, displays and prints Opentype fonts.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Thanks again to everyone who responded to my question.
I fetched OO.o 3.2 and installed it. Installation on my system took
about 45 minutes.
My system is runs XP SP3, processor is Sempron 2800+, 1.6 GHz, with 1 GB
RAM, and fairly fast hard drives, kept defragmented (Diskeeper). I don't
know
David B Teague ha scritto:
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even
a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had some particularly bad luck
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even
a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had some particularly bad luck in upgrades recently though
David B Teague wrote:
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do.
Even a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had some particularly bad luck in
On 14-Feb-10 15:22, David B Teague wrote:
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do.
Even a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had some
2010/2/14 David B Teague davidbtea...@verizon.net:
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and that
it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even a URL to
an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had
On 2/14/2010 4:22 PM, David B Teague wrote:
...
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like [OO.o
3.2], and that it runs as well as 3.1?
...
Many thanks to Johnny, Troll/Idiot and Web Kracked for their positive
and useful responses to this question.
I'll fetch and install
11 matches
Mail list logo
