My experience with WinXP/SP3, Intel CoreDuo 2GhZ, 4Gb Ram, is that it is
faster than 3.1, but it is very crash prone at the point of saving a file
at least in OOW... which is not good, not to mention a big waste of time.
Now in most all cases I was able to recover the files, but sofar nothing
I've done has made the process any smoother.
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:48:01 -0500, Marcello Romani
<mrom...@ottotecnica.com> wrote:
David B Teague ha scritto:
I understand that OOo 3.2 is available.
Would someone please give a very brief statement that you like it, and
that it runs as well as 3.1? Any problems? One sentence would do. Even
a URL to an OO.o users' forum would be OK.
I have had some particularly bad luck in upgrades recently though
NEVER from OO.o.
David Teague
Flames to /dev/null, please.
Installed on a Windows XP SP3 system, Athlon XP 1.8GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB
HD. First impression is it's _much_ faster than 3.1 installed on the
same system. Haven't tested it extensively, but no problems so far.
Thanks to everybody who contributed to this release!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
