Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-17 Thread James Knott
jonathon wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > There aren't any contracts that say you can't install free software > > a) I've seen contracts that prohibited the installation of FLOSS; > b) I've seen EULAs that prohibited the installation of the software on a > FLOSS platform; > > As far as lawsu

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-17 Thread M Henri Day
It strikes me that Anna Tang asked a simple question to which, however, there is no simple answer (lawyers seem to write laws in such a manner as to make disputes profitable to their professional group inevitable). Under these circumstances, the circumspection exhibited by NoOp in his reply yesterd

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-17 Thread James Knott
jonathon wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: > > > She asked a very simple question: Is it legal for me to use OO on > several > > computers without paying a license fee. > > The answer to that is "it depends" > What contracts has she signed? What is the wording of those contracts? > > > The answer to her

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-17 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There aren't any contracts that say you can't install free software a) I've seen contracts that prohibited the installation of FLOSS; b) I've seen EULAs that prohibited the installation of the software on a FLOSS platform;

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-17 Thread linuxmaillists
On Friday 17 August 2007 00:10:27 jonathon wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: > > She asked a very simple question: Is it legal for me to use OO > > on several computers without paying a license fee. > > The answer to that is "it depends" > What contracts has she signed? What is the wording of those > con

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:10:27 +0100 jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If installing FLOSS is a breech of contract, what is your defence going > to be when she sues you for triple damages? I have never seen an service contract that actually prohibits the installation of Free Software on a compu

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-16 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Cox wrote: > She asked a very simple question: Is it legal for me to use OO on several > computers without paying a license fee. The answer to that is "it depends" What contracts has she signed? What is the wording of those contracts? > The

Re: [users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:07:58 -0700 NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank, please don't do this. You have no authority to *confirm anything* > on OOo's behalf. I can read, and have been working with and around the GPL and LGPL for several years now. She asked a very simple question: Is it lega

[users] Re: Licensing enquiry

2007-08-16 Thread NoOp
On 08/16/2007 03:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:03:47 +0800 "Annie Tang" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Your help is much appreciated if you can confirm soonest possible >> that if it is legal for me to use OpenOffice for corporate use (> >> 20 computers) without any licensing