Frank Cox wrote:
That's where you get into the "but does this apply to me too" type of
questions. Providing a general answer that is, in fact, the answer is one
thing. But personal reassurance that yes, this means you too -- that's
important when you're dealing with a magic black box.
jonathon wrote:
John wrote:
Program functionality is directly affected by the edition of Vista
that one uses.
What the person should be asking is Does this specific functionality
in OOo work with this specific edition/localization of Vista?
In an ideal world, there would be a page on the
John wrote:
just saying that some are a little too literal (ie if you say that
Openoffice works with Windows Vista, somebody will come along and ask if
it works with Windows Vista Personal/Business/etc edition).
Program functionality is directly affected by the edition of Vista
that one uses.
John Meyer wrote:
James Knott wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
The Signature and the image are good, but for some people you need to
spell it out. Again, I'm not cracking on people's intelligence. I'm
just saying that some are a little too literal (ie if you say that
Openoffice works with
On or about 11/23/2007 12:27 AM, Brian Barker penned the following:
At 19:41 22/11/2007 -0500, James Knott wrote:
I don't use HTML on most lists, but I thought I'd let it through on
this one, to show that picture, which comes from a server and is not
actually part of the message. The entire
John Meyer wrote:
The Signature and the image are good, but for some people you need to
spell it out. Again, I'm not cracking on people's intelligence. I'm
just saying that some are a little too literal (ie if you say that
Openoffice works with Windows Vista, somebody will come along
James Knott wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
The Signature and the image are good, but for some people you need to
spell it out. Again, I'm not cracking on people's intelligence. I'm
just saying that some are a little too literal (ie if you say that
Openoffice works with Windows Vista, somebody
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On
11/22/07 5:31 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
That's why I started writing letters to
MaximumPC and PC Computing just to get the word out. Hopefully
something will get their attention.
Also, note the sig on my email. These icons
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:45:10 -0700
John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Signature and the image are good, but for some people you need to
spell it out. Again, I'm not cracking on people's intelligence. I'm
just saying that some are a little too literal (ie if you say that
Openoffice
At 19:41 22/11/2007 -0500, James Knott wrote:
I don't use HTML on most lists, but I thought I'd let it through on
this one, to show that picture, which comes from a server and is not
actually part of the message. The entire sig is 206 characters.
For what it's worth, I don't think this is
-Original Message-
From: Frank Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 7:53 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Cc: John Meyer
Subject: Re: [users] Re: OOo is free to get, free to use--why is that not
generally known?
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:45:10 -0700
John Meyer [EMAIL
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 11/22/07 5:31 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
That's why I started writing letters to MaximumPC and PC Computing
just to get the word out. Hopefully something will get their
attention.
Also, note the sig on my email. These icons are
On 11/22/07 5:31 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
That's why I started writing letters to MaximumPC and PC Computing
just to get the word out. Hopefully something will get their attention.
Also, note the sig on my email. These icons are available on the OO
site and can be added to
13 matches
Mail list logo
