On Mar 15, 2005, at 22:36, Tamblyne wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 14 March 2005 02:00, Naomi Kramer wrote:
Gene...
Huh?
Am I understanding your complaint correctly - that you need to
create an account on the openoffice.org site, and login under that
account name, before filing a bug? It see
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 14 March 2005 02:00, Naomi Kramer wrote:
Gene...
Huh?
Am I understanding your complaint correctly - that you need to
create an account on the openoffice.org site, and login under that
account name, before filing a bug? It seems fair enough to me -
maybe I'm missing so
Gene,
I guess it depends on which page you ended up :-) Here's the standard
user registration page link -
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/Join
(I admit, I have trouble using the site at times too... so you're not
alone. H... you're not a web designer are you?)
- Naomi
I got the impress
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 23:27, Jim Wagner wrote:
[...rant]>
Worse yet, everyone here are volunteers, nobody gets paid by the
hour or anything else.
So you took careful aim and shot at a big straw man.
JimW
Maybe so Jim, but how do you folks actually working on the code expect
On Monday 14 March 2005 02:00, Naomi Kramer wrote:
>Gene...
>
>Huh?
>
>Am I understanding your complaint correctly - that you need to
> create an account on the openoffice.org site, and login under that
> account name, before filing a bug? It seems fair enough to me -
> maybe I'm missing something
Gene...
Huh?
Am I understanding your complaint correctly - that you need to create an
account on the openoffice.org site, and login under that account name,
before filing a bug? It seems fair enough to me - maybe I'm missing
something though?
- Naomi
PS. Most of the people on this Users list a
On Sunday 13 March 2005 23:27, Jim Wagner wrote:
[...rant]>
>Worse yet, everyone here are volunteers, nobody gets paid by the
> hour or anything else.
>
>So you took careful aim and shot at a big straw man.
>
>JimW
Maybe so Jim, but how do you folks actually working on the code expect
to get a bu
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 21:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
Donning my nomex underwear here.
I lost the ficticious bet at the bottom, it did make the list.
Using the 680 download from yesterday, I just composed a cover for a
manual I'm putting together for gEDA and gnucap, and I used t
On Sunday 13 March 2005 21:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
>Donning my nomex underwear here.
I lost the ficticious bet at the bottom, it did make the list.
>Using the 680 download from yesterday, I just composed a cover for a
>manual I'm putting together for gEDA and gnucap, and I used the
>simulated and
Donning my nomex underwear here.
Using the 680 download from yesterday, I just composed a cover for a
manual I'm putting together for gEDA and gnucap, and I used the
simulated and gate graphic called geda-logo.xpm from the gEDA package
as a graphic insert in a one page 'text document' along wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
