Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Mathias Bauer wrote: Web Kracked wrote: I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" that the software link listed Nero's website for OOo web site. Also some articles seems to think Wind

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Web Kracked wrote: > I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta > > > It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible > with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" > that the software link listed Nero's website for OOo web site. > > > Also some articles seems to think Windows 7

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

JessicaD has left a new comment on your post "Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Win...": Tim Deaton, You may also want to check out the Windows 7 fo

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 15:36 -0400, Richard Detwiler wrote: James R. Liebert wrote: I don't buy this argument for a second. Uncountable collaborations are proceeding toward completion. All life is a collaboration. You are suggesting that the Australian rudder for th

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 15:36 -0400, Richard Detwiler wrote: > James R. Liebert wrote: > > I don't buy this argument for a second. Uncountable collaborations are > > proceeding toward completion. All life is a collaboration. You are > > suggesting that the Australian rudder for the Boeing 777 proc

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

James R. Liebert wrote: I don't buy this argument for a second. Uncountable collaborations are proceeding toward completion. All life is a collaboration. You are suggesting that the Australian rudder for the Boeing 777 proceeded independently to final design and manufacture while the American

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

I don't buy this argument for a second. Uncountable collaborations are proceeding toward completion. All life is a collaboration. You are suggesting that the Australian rudder for the Boeing 777 proceeded independently to final design and manufacture while the American tail assembly was designed

RE: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

> > Either MS wanted confusion, or they just bugged the software > to not know what is what when determining if the software > would work. Hey, if MS does not certify the software, then > it may not or will not run according to MS. If you do not > pay me, we will not say it works. Windows Log

RE: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

> To ALL: Why bother even getting Win 7, if Win 8 is following right > behind? NOT only that but some one is working on a Open Source version > of Windows which will be totally FREE! Please access the SeaMonkey > support site and ask about that program, you may be pleasantly > surprised! :-) Um, w

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

We shall see what we shall see. Ah now there is a fresh thought...actually approaching it with an open mind...good for you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Tim Deaton wrote: Thank you, Drew, for answering the original question. I may be using Win7 very soon, and as I waded thru this thread, I was beginning to wonder if anyone had actually tested it on Win7. -- Tim Tim, Well remember that I have not tested it in depth - just a little here and t

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Thank you, Drew, for answering the original question. I may be using Win7 very soon, and as I waded thru this thread, I was beginning to wonder if anyone had actually tested it on Win7. -- Tim Drew Jensen wrote: I am just asking if someone has tried Win7 and OOo to counter what the upgrade a

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Drew Jensen wrote: I am just asking if someone has tried Win7 and OOo to counter what the upgrade advisor software is saying. Well - I have been running Windows 7 (Someone called it Vista 7 - never heard of that package) RC since it's release. I have been running OO.o on it since oh 20 min

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Lars Nooden wrote: Web Kracked wrote: The update advisor stated OOo was not compatible, not "untrusted". MS has a history of false advertising http://www.msversus.org/microsoft-marketing.html http://traderegulation.blogspot.com/2009/03/microsoft-vista-false-advertising-suit.html It also ha

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

I am just asking if someone has tried Win7 and OOo to counter what the upgrade advisor software is saying. Well - I have been running Windows 7 (Someone called it Vista 7 - never heard of that package) RC since it's release. I have been running OO.o on it since oh 20 minutes after loading W

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Web Kracked wrote: > The update advisor stated OOo was not compatible, not "untrusted". MS has a history of false advertising http://www.msversus.org/microsoft-marketing.html http://traderegulation.blogspot.com/2009/03/microsoft-vista-false-advertising-suit.html It also has a history of active

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

jonathon wrote: > Michael Adams wrote: >> I am sure in either case that there will be minimal issues when the >> final version of 7 is released. Get over it. > > If Win 7.0 prohibits "untrusted" software from running, then OOo > _might_ be in trouble. > Well, I don't consider anything from Microso

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Michael Adams wrote: On Sun, 31 May 2009 08:10:02 + Came this utterance formulated by jonathon to my mailbox: Michael Adams wrote: I am sure in either case that there will be minimal issues when the final version of 7 is released. Get over it. If Win 7.0 prohibits "untrusted" software fro

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Michael Adams wrote: On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:18:58 -0400 Came this utterance formulated by Web Kracked to my mailbox: I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" that the software link lis

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

On Sun, 31 May 2009 08:10:02 + Came this utterance formulated by jonathon to my mailbox: > Michael Adams wrote: > > I am sure in either case that there will be minimal issues when the > > final version of 7 is released. Get over it. > > If Win 7.0 prohibits "untrusted" software from running,

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Michael Adams wrote: I am sure in either case that there will be minimal issues when the final version of 7 is released. Get over it. If Win 7.0 prohibits "untrusted" software from running, then OOo _might_ be in trouble. "Untrusted" means "Software that has not paid the Microsoft tax, and

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:18:58 -0400 Came this utterance formulated by Web Kracked to my mailbox: > > I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta > > > It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible > with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" > that the software link listed Nero'

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

David B Teague wrote: WebCracked wrote, and Adam Tauno Williams saw fit to omit: I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" that the software link listed Nero's website for OOo web site.

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Web Kracked wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> Also some articles seems to think Windows 7 will cost at least >>> 25% of the total cost of a new PC. It also appears that the same >>> web sites are hosting articles saying MS is already working on >>> the pre-Alpha version of Windows 8. >> >> A

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Also some articles seems to think Windows 7 will cost at least 25% of the total cost of a new PC. It also appears that the same web sites are hosting articles saying MS is already working on the pre-Alpha version of Windows 8. And how does that have anything to do wi

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

Web Kracked wrote: > I just ran - Windows 7 ... How embarassing. If the hardware is still good, you might work on getting an upgrade CD : http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora http://xubuntu.org/get http://www.kubuntu.org/ and put that machine back into usable condition.

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

WebCracked wrote, and Adam Tauno Williams saw fit to omit: I just ran - Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta It stated that OpenOffice.org 3.1 was not compatible with Windows 7. Of course the "publisher's website" that the software link listed Nero's website for OOo web site. Adam Tauno Williams wr

Re: [users] OpenOffice 3.1 not compatible with Windows 7?

>Also some articles seems to think Windows 7 will cost at least >25% of the total cost of a new PC. It also appears that the same >web sites are hosting articles saying MS is already working on >the pre-Alpha version of Windows 8. And how does that have anything to do with OOo? >Well, if anyone