- Original Message -
From: mots m...@nepu.moe
To: Eli Mesika emes...@redhat.com
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:53:53 PM
Subject: AW: [ovirt-users] Fake power management?
Hello Eli,
If I replace /usr/bin/vdsm-tool service-restart vdsmd with echo b
I have been trying to use libgfapi glusterfs support in oVirt but can't
get it to work. After talks on IRC it seems I should apply a patch
(http://gerrit.ovirt.org/33768) to enable libgf BUT I can't get it to
work. Systems used:
- hosts Centos7 or Fedora20 (so upto date qemu/libvirt/oVirt(3.5))
-
Hi, im not sure if understand the oVirt concept right. Is the oVirt node
hypervisor the machine that provides the computing power for the client
consoles (User Applications)? Is the VM running on the node Hypervisor?
Can i use 1 PC for the complete oVirt environment + the consoles?
--
Diese
- Original Message -
From: Harald Wolf ov...@online.de
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 10:46:21 AM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Which machine provides the computing power for the
clients?
Hi, im not sure if understand the oVirt concept right. Is the oVirt node
On 17.11.2014 09:46, Harald Wolf wrote:
Hi, im not sure if understand the oVirt concept right. Is the oVirt node
hypervisor the machine that provides the computing power for the client
consoles
(User Applications)? Is the VM running on the node Hypervisor?
Can i use 1 PC for the complete
So, a quick non-scientific poll...
Motivation: It has been suggested that adding ubuntu or debian distro
support could broaden the reach of the oVirt community.
To date, there has been some work towards this goal, but it is not
coming to a conclusion.
Questions that comes to mind:
1) Is
Hi Luf,
Apologies, I probably don't understand the details of your L2 toplogy;
how come when you turn off one host it affects the link state of of the
other one's interfaces?...
Yours, Lior.
On 14/11/14 11:43, Finstrle, Ludek wrote:
Hi,
I have 2-node ovirt cluster. Both machines has 4
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:10:32AM -0700, Groten, Ryan wrote:
I went through this a couple months ago. Migrated my hosted-engine from
one NFS host to another. Here are the steps that I documented from the
experience.
just wanted to let you know that my migration went flawlessly,
- Original Message -
From: mots m...@nepu.moe
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:54:08 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Fake power management?
Fake power management? Hello,
I'm building a small demonstration system for our sales team to take to a
customer so that
Yes, pacemaker manages the engine. That part is working fine, the engine
restarts on the remaining node without problems.
It's just that the guests don't come back up until the powered down node has
been fenced manually.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com
Hello,
1) I hope this is still an issue, mostly because I would really love to use
mandos[1] on the engine, and that only works with Debian/Ubuntu.
2) Can't comment on, I'm just a user, after all.
3) Can't comment on, I'm just a user, after all.
4) Debian GNU/Linux has things in its standard
Hello,
I upgraded oVirt to version 3.5.0 today and I also installed Optaplanner in a
separate VM. While the installation was successful the Optimizer tab in oVirt
Engine doesn't report the correct information. Although there are VMs that are
shutdown and the hosts are not balanced in terms of
Hi Harald,
Could you perhaps refine your question? Also, what do you mean by
console user - are you referring to a VM?
The hardware of a host is the principal factor in determining the best
computing power of a VM, but of course there'll always be some overhead
(i.e. it'll never be equal to the
Hi Tibor,
On 13/11/14 13:41, Demeter Tibor wrote:
Hi,
I have a 3 node gluster based cluster. There are 3x3 Nic with bonding.
Sometimes the management is very slow because high gluster traffic.
Is it possible to separate ovirtmgmt network from glusterfs traffic?
I have only one interface
Hi,
Meanwhile this happening in every two hours.
For example 09:21, 11:21, 13:21
Anybody can me help?
Thanks,
Tibor
- Eredeti üzenet -
Hi,
In this morning I have got a lot of similar messages to console:
2014-Nov-17, 03:21
Detected conflict in hook
On 11/17/2014 12:25 PM, Demeter Tibor wrote:
Hi,
In this morning I have got a lot of similar messages to console:
2014-Nov-17, 03:21
Detected conflict in hook set-POST-30samba-set.sh of Cluster
r710cluster1.
2014-Nov-17, 03:21
Detected conflict in hook stop-PRE-29CTDB-teardown.sh of
On 17/11/14 04:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
So, a quick non-scientific poll...
Motivation: It has been suggested that adding ubuntu or debian distro
support could broaden the reach of the oVirt community.
To date, there has been some work towards this goal, but it is not
coming to a conclusion.
On 11/17/2014 06:14 PM, Demeter Tibor wrote:
Hi,
Meanwhile this happening in every two hours.
For example 09:21, 11:21, 13:21
Anybody can me help?
Thanks,
Tibor
This happens because the time for syncing the hooks from node to engine
has been configured for two hours.
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply.
Yes, the vms are used an independent network/network interfaces for access the
internet.
So, in this case I could separate the high glusterfs traffic from ovirt
management traffic when I disable vm network on ovirtmgmt interface.
I will try-out this
On 17/11/14 15:10, Demeter Tibor wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply.
Yes, the vms are used an independent network/network interfaces for access
the internet.
So, in this case I could separate the high glusterfs traffic from ovirt
management traffic when I disable vm
Ok, thanks a lot!
Have a nice day,
Tibor
- Eredeti üzenet -
On 17/11/14 15:10, Demeter Tibor wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply.
Yes, the vms are used an independent network/network interfaces for access
the internet.
So, in this case I could separate
On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
1) Is this still an issue?
Yes of course, or is it implemented yet?
2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to
stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it worth the
potential impact?
In general: Software which
Il 17/11/2014 14:22, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
1) Is this still an issue?
Yes of course, or is it implemented yet?
2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to
stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it worth the
Hello Joop,
thanks for raising the issue as it is one of the things I assumed are
already implemented and working.
Sadly I cannot provide any answer ...
On 17.11.2014 09:39, Joop wrote:
I have been trying to use libgfapi glusterfs support in oVirt but can't
get it to work. After talks on IRC
Finally got chance to test this but unfortunately it did not work. I did make
a change to replace:
HOOK_NAME = 'extnet_pg'
with
HOOK_NAME = 'extnet_ovs'
and on the engine it looks okay:
CustomDeviceProperties: {type=interface;prop={extnet_ovs=^[a-zA-Z0-9_
---]+(:[a-zA-Z0-9_ ---]+|)$}}
- Original Message -
From: s k sokratis1...@outlook.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:52:42 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Optaplanner Problem
Hello,
I upgraded oVirt to version 3.5.0 today and I also installed Optaplanner in a
separate VM. While the
- Original Message -
From: Sven Kieske svenkie...@gmail.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 9:03:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] noVNC problems after upgrading to 3.5.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14.11.2014 23:27, Darrell Budic
Hi all,
Since I upgraded engine to 3.5, I can't add new disk anymore to
existant vms, none than create a new vm with a new disk. Clicking on OK
button after the disk definition does nothing. I tried many situations
(preallocated or thin provision) or changing of storage domain, but it
is
On 17/11/14 13:47, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote:
Hi all,
Since I upgraded engine to 3.5, I can't add new disk anymore to
existant vms, none than create a new vm with a new disk. Clicking on
OK button after the disk definition does nothing. I tried many
situations (preallocated or thin
Thanx, it works for now... this leads me to another question : how can I
personnalize qos, seems that only unlimlited is possible.
Le 17/11/2014 17:58, Federico Alberto Sayd a écrit :
On 17/11/14 13:47, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote:
Hi all,
Since I upgraded engine to 3.5, I can't add new disk
- Original Message -
From: mots m...@nepu.moe
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:24:29 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] ovirt-websocket-proxy uses the wrong IP
ovirt-websocket-proxy uses the wrong IP Hello,
One of my nodes has two IP addresses, 10.42.0.101 and
Hello, is using the new structure AAA (Authentication, Authorization and
Accouting) of the oVirt 3.5?
--
Ao encaminhar esta mensagem, por favor:
1. Apague o meu e-mail e o meu nome.
2. Apague também os endereços dos amigos antes de reenviar
3. Use Cco ou Bcc para enviar mensagens!
Dificulte a
On 11/17/2014 02:41 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
So, a quick non-scientific poll...
Motivation: It has been suggested that adding ubuntu or debian distro
support could broaden the reach of the oVirt community.
To date, there has been some work towards this goal, but it is not
coming to a
Once upon a time, Darrell Budic bu...@onholyground.com said:
Glad it worked. Make sure you add it to the vm.conf file on all your ha
hosts, otherwise you’ll drop it if ha-agent restarts it as opposed to a
migration. Wasn’t clear if you’d done that or not.
Based on some other notes I found
During setup, I allowed the script to change iptables rules. Is this
necessary? Also, is it an active management (where oVirt will make
changes), or just a one-time thing?
I ask because I have some other iptables setup I want (such as limited
SSH access), and I don't want to make changes to
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:48:59 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] iptables management
During setup, I allowed the script to change iptables rules. Is this
necessary? Also, is it an active management
Hi!
I have Installed ovirt 3.5 on CentOS 6.6 following this documentation
http://www.ovirt.org/Quick_Start_Guide#Introduction, but I'm having a
problem on utilization of the default data center. Why I can't utilize the
default data center? Please help. Thanks in advance.
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Christensen cameron.christen...@uk2group.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:39:54 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Upgrade to Ovirt 3.5.0 Authentication Fails to IPA
Hello,
I upgraded to ovirt 3.5.0 and can no longer
Thank you for your reply.
The engine resolves the node's IP correctly. A few details about the setup:
It's a two node cluster with shared, internal storage using DRBD. The storage
is managed by pacemaker, so that the node which currently serves as iscsi
target gets assigned the additional IP.
Hello all,
I'm exploring using oVirt 3.5 as the management engine for a new cluster I am
building. I don't really need high availability and I have 3 servers with fast
SSDs on local storage I'd like to use, preferably using ZFS to ensure
reliability of the storage.
I set up a brand new CentOS
Once upon a time, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com said:
I guess you mean engine setup, right?
Yes, that and hosted-engine --deploy.
Each time you run engine-setup you will be prompt if you want to override
iptables settings.
If you choose to override, the current settings will be backed up
On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 14:39 -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Christensen cameron.christen...@uk2group.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:39:54 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Upgrade to Ovirt 3.5.0 Authentication Fails to IPA
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Christensen cameron.christen...@uk2group.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:43:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade to Ovirt 3.5.0 Authentication Fails to IPA
On Mon, 2014-11-17
Hi Lior,
If I'm not mistaken, on Luf's topology, there is no switch on the
management bond (bond0) - just a cross or regular eth cable connecting
physical interfaces on both nodes. So when one node is powered down, there
is no link detected on the other node.
Regards,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at
Well you can hack the solution in the form of replacing the fencing master
script to always return success (Eli can help you with that),
and define an imaginary fencing device on each host ... meaning that the
fencing command will always succeeds.
But this may be risky ... as you might end up
I also recently started getting these errors. They started when I upgraded
from 3.4.0 to 3.4.2.
The error appears on certain VMs (but not all) consistently every 15 minutes.
It doesn't matter if the Memory Balloon Device Enabled checkbox checked or
unchecked.
I got the message to stop
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com mailto:bazu...@redhat.com
Gesendet: Mon 17 November 2014 23:30
An: Patrick Lottenbach p...@a-bot.ch mailto:p...@a-bot.ch
CC: users@ovirt.org mailto:users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [ovirt-users] Fake power management?
- Original Message -
From: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
To: Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:53:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] iptables management
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
To:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:22:42 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] iptables management
Once upon a time, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com said:
I guess you mean engine setup, right?
Yes, that and
49 matches
Mail list logo
