>What implementation is provided for these abilities in the spec is up to
the implementer
Thanks for the reply Carl.
But can't the standards body decide what are the must features and
standardize on them ?
I have no experience in standards process but, really, what prevents an
Apache flavour of
Andrew,
In some other work some of I guys I work with have done have created a
low-latency scheduling mechanism via AMQP (Qpid) for the Condor Grid. It
sounds like you are trying to achieve something equivalent using a
different grid engine. If you like I can point you to doc and code for
th
Actually this was to integrate with Terracotta. TC needs some sort of
load balancer to get locality of reference (for performance) - qpid
would fit the bill here, via hierarchical topics. There'd only be a
single subscriber on a topic at a time. TC clients are notified as
nodes join/leave,
2009/1/30 Andrew Wright :
> Apologies, I've confused the options rather. We'd thought about using the
> dynamic federation features in M4 to get effective point-to-point links
> between 'entry' nodes, and 'processing' nodes, in a distributed app. The
> idea was that each app node would subscribe to
Apologies, I've confused the options rather. We'd thought about using
the dynamic federation features in M4 to get effective point-to-point
links between 'entry' nodes, and 'processing' nodes, in a distributed
app. The idea was that each app node would subscribe to a subset of
incoming mess
2009/1/29 Andrew Wright :
> There is currently debate going on as to the relative merits of a
> centralised, active-active qpid cluster vs. local brokers on active-active
> application nodes. Given we're looking at using durable topic subscribers,
> does anyone have recommendations/suggestions/war
2009/1/30 Jeffrey Bride :
> I have the liberty of deciding whether to use a JMS or AMQP flavored
> (via org.apache.qpid.transport.Session) approach in my producers and
> consumers and I'm wondering whether experts on this list might have a
> bias between the two ? In particular, I've been using
Hi,
The U.S. Marine Corps is moving toward a service oriented approach of
developing their software. As such, we've decided to use AMQP as the
wire protocol between services.
Our first stab with AMQP has JBoss ESB gateways and notifiers
communicating with the latest C++ QPid broker. We are us
Joshua Kramer wrote:
> Has anyone run tests on the Windows broker binary I created last week?
Hi Josh,
Thank you very much for the pre-built binaries. A version that
differs from yours only slightly (boost 1.35 versus your 1.36) has
been run through the full python broker tests (from a Linux box
I know M4 C++ was burn run it for days. That is not saying you might not
find something in your use-case. If you do just mail us.
Has anyone run tests on the Windows broker binary I created last week? I
haven't had a chance to do this yet as I do most of my dev work under
Linux.
Thanks,
-
spaace wrote:
Thanks Joshua. It does look like i will be favouring qpid after all. The
only point of concern is now stability and performance. Does the release
process of qpid have any longevity tests ?
I know M4 C++ was burn run it for days. That is not saying you might not
find something in
Hey Josep,
I spent like a week or so racking my brains trying to run the C++ Examples
of qpid on Windows, but the farthest I could get was exactly where you did.
It seems like there are some changes that need to be made above the project
generation, otherwise it's quite unlikely that we manage
Hey Josep,
I spent like a week or so racking my brains trying to run the C++ Examples
of qpid on Windows, but the farthest I could get was exactly where you did.
It seems like there are some changes that need to be made above the project
generation, otherwise it's quite unlikely that we manage to
The Java broker has a set of extensive performance & reliability tests which
are run on various platforms as part of each release cycle.
I have some documentation on this set of tests and I'll make it available as
soon as possible, on the Qpid pages.
Watch this space !
Marnie
On Fri, Jan 30, 20
Hi everyone,
I've been told to make qpid work in windows. I've been able to make the
broker run but not a client. As a start point, I've modified
declare_queues.cpp file erasing all code except the includes. The entire
example code is attached below:
#include "qpid\client\Connection.h"
#inc
Thanks Joshua. It does look like i will be favouring qpid after all. The
only point of concern is now stability and performance. Does the release
process of qpid have any longevity tests ?
Rgds
Arun
ps : Where can i get hold of the test suites part of qpid to tweak / perform
some of these myself?
16 matches
Mail list logo
