2009/1/29 Andrew Wright <atwri...@mac.com>: > There is currently debate going on as to the relative merits of a > centralised, active-active qpid cluster vs. local brokers on active-active > application nodes. Given we're looking at using durable topic subscribers, > does anyone have recommendations/suggestions/war stories about the relative > broker setups?
I'm trying to understand the second option you describe. Are you referring to what might be described as the "traditional" IBM MQ topology where there is a local broker that federates into a central remote broker? RG --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
