No problem, glad to help.
I have just realised that what I said about the protocol support differences
is actually wrong though, the Java broker does support the same AMQP 0-10
protocol as the C++ broker in the 0.6 release, in addition to its previous
0-8 and 0-9 support. It's been so long since
Thanks, Robbie. I did generate an example keystore using the script, and edited
the config file to point to it; I didn't catch the distinction between
config.xml and transient_/persistent_config.xml before, though -- I'll use the
base config from here out.
Virtualhost makes more sense, and that
Hi Carl,
The config.xml file that is loaded by default is what you should use, its
the basis for what development and testing is done against. To start the
broker out of the box using the config.xml you will need to either edit
config.xml to disable mangement SSL, or use the provided scripts in th
Great, Elena - I'm glad to hear you got it working.
If you can attach your C# changes to a jira
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/qpid) as a patch, and please make
sure to check the box granting rights to Apache, that would be great.
Thanks,
-Steve
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your reply.
> Did you use https://broker-addr:5671 ?
> (If you use http:// it would probably act as you observed)
Indeed I haven't thought of https, and you are exactly right, it works. I
only doubted the broker configuration and format of the client certificate
because I
I've gotten a Java broker running using the transient_config shipped with the
qpid 0.6 release. I'm trying to connect to that using the simple Java
Client/Server classes in org.apache.qpid.example.simple.reqresp, but I'm not
having any success. With either of those classes (modified to use the b
This can be done with the qpid python libs, there are a few threads on
the list already on the topic.
If you can't locate them in the archive, shout, and we can maybe post an
example and post it on the
wiki.
Carl.
On 04/07/2010 05:04 AM, Kiss Péter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm quite new to
On 04/07/2010 03:36 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:30, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:02, Alan Conway wrote:
On 03/30/2010 05:38 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently run some tests to try and see how much overhead
clustering
brings. In short - I saw
