On 07/15/2013 05:38 PM, Axel Podehl wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to deploy the same mapping of AMQP to JMS properties
in the QPid API itself ?
I would agree.
[FWIW the c++ qpid::messaging API does something similar. I.e. all AMQP
1.0 properties etc that do not have direct accessors in the
On 07/15/2013 07:05 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
This thread interests me somewhat, in particular with respect to the new
paging mechanism and also the backup engine in 0.24 (and I guess trunk).
Is there any info/examples on how to set these up and have a play? Are
they AMQP 0.10/1.0 neutral or do
Work on a complete JMS mapping is underway, in conjunction with the OASIS
AMQP Bindings and Mappings Technical Committee. There will be a way to
access all properties directly or indirectly once this is complete.
-- Rob
On 16 July 2013 12:57, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/15/2013
Ok, great - any idea what time-frame this might be implemented by ?
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/JMS-API-incomplete-tp7595272p7595407.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The section you mention below is for Active-Passive. I don't see anything about
Active-Active (clients can connect to any of the brokers) -- I thought I saw
that somewhere in the Qpid documentation, but its not in the manual you linked
to below. Is Active-Active not available?
-Original
To fill in a little more about clients can connect to any of the brokers, in
the active-passive mode, clients connect to a virtual IP address that gets
moved around to the current primary broker (this is one of the things driven by
the resource manager). If the primary crashes (or its node
Can you please post here:
- what qpid version you are trying to build
- the configure or cmake output
Thanks,
-Steve Huston
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Wagner [mailto:coolness_2...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:02 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Unable to
