On 04/14/2016 01:57 PM, Adel Boutros wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to use qpid-dispatch on SunOS. Before I ask specific questions, I would
like to know why in the readme, it is mentioned "Dispatch will not build on
Windows"? Does it imply that the API was built for a pure Linux-oriented OS and
On 04/14/2016 01:28 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi all,
I have put up an RC for 0.12.2, please test it and vote accordingly.
The source release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.2-rc1/
Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be
Hi, everyone. Our work on the Proton C++ API has progressed quite a bit,
and it's time to talk about the changes.
First, a confession. I described the API we delivered in 0.12.0 as
"substantially settled", excepting some of the extension APIs and those API
elements that were hidden in the API
Hello,
We are trying to use qpid-dispatch on SunOS. Before I ask specific questions, I
would like to know why in the readme, it is mentioned "Dispatch will not build
on Windows"? Does it imply that the API was built for a pure Linux-oriented OS
and thus it is expected to have issues on other
On 14 April 2016 at 18:28, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have put up an RC for 0.12.2, please test it and vote accordingly.
>
> The source release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.2-rc1/
>
>
Hi all,
I have put up an RC for 0.12.2, please test it and vote accordingly.
The source release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.2-rc1/
Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at:
The first beta update release (beta2) of Apache Qpid Dispatch Router
0.6.0 is available for testing. You can find the files here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/dispatch/0.6.0-beta2/
This update includes the fixes to 12 issues that were discovered during
testing of the beta1
No need for a respin. I'm just proposing deletion of some redundant
artifacts that were presumably just pulled from repository.apache.org
with the others after being auto-generated.
Robbie
On 14 April 2016 at 14:20, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> I'm not sure whether we need RC2 and new
I'm not sure whether we need RC2 and new vote to address Robbie's comment.
But I the tested the new release, especially with focus on the AMQP 0-10
client and all works well.
+1
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> On 13 April 2016 at 14:04, Keith