Adding the qpid PPA (ppa:qpid/released) did not help. Same with the package
from latest release 16.04. It seems to me that ubuntu dev package does not
contain these development files by default.
Regards,
Tomas
2016-04-25 16:06 GMT+02:00 Andrew Stitcher :
> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 10:36 +0200, Tomá
Agreed, this seems like code that would be better off living in the
hawtdispatch project if someone really wanted to pick up that torch.
On 04/26/2016 12:37 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
'proton/contrib/proton-hawtdispatch' module.
hawtdispatch itse
Those are the only two things in there right now, so yes removing both
would currently have that effect.
I'd judge anything new for contribution on its own merits, but in many
cases I'd think such things would be more appropriate in their own repo
going forward, with only the most core related thi
+1 ... if we remove this and proton-jms, I presume the plan is to remove
contrib altogether - our history suggests that "contrib" sources are mostly
neglected after they are added to the codebase, so I'd be keen to try to
avoid them in the future :-)
-- Rob
On 26 April 2016 at 18:37, Robbie Gemme
+1 (non binding)
Madhawa
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 26/04/16 15:40, Justin Ross wrote:
>
>> As proposed and discussed at the following links:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-source-code-reorg-update-tt7641526.html
>>
>>
>> http://qpid.2158936.n2.
On 26/04/16 15:40, Justin Ross wrote:
As proposed and discussed at the following links:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-source-code-reorg-update-tt7641526.html
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-Subversion-reorganization-proposal-tt7639094.html
https://github.com/ssorj/qpid-svn-r
+1
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 10:41 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
>> 'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module.
>>
>> It was written as part of adding AMQP 1.0 support to the ActiveMQ 5.x
>> broker and then con
On 04/26/2016 10:41 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module.
It was written as part of adding AMQP 1.0 support to the ActiveMQ 5.x
broker and then contributed to Proton, and used across ActiveMQ
5.x/Artemis/Apollo. The code wa
As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
'proton/contrib/proton-hawtdispatch' module.
hawtdispatch itself doesn't appear to be seeing any development these
days, with only a handful of commits in the last couple years on
master, none in approaching a year, and the referenced website
appear
Makes sense to me, it always seemed to me that it would be a better fit
under the ActiveMQ project
-- Rob
On 26 April 2016 at 15:41, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
> 'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module.
>
> It was written as part of adding AMQP 1.0 suppo
+1
On 04/26/2016 10:40 AM, Justin Ross wrote:
As proposed and discussed at the following links:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-source-code-reorg-update-tt7641526.html
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-Subversion-reorganization-proposal-tt7639094.html
https://github.com/ssorj/q
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Ross [mailto:justin.r...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:40 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid C++ and Qpid Python to Git
>
> As proposed and discussed at the following links:
>
>
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.na
On 26 April 2016 at 15:40, Justin Ross wrote:
> As proposed and discussed at the following links:
>
>
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-source-code-reorg-update-tt7641526.html
>
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-Subversion-reorganization-proposal-tt7639094.html
> https://github.com
As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing
'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module.
It was written as part of adding AMQP 1.0 support to the ActiveMQ 5.x
broker and then contributed to Proton, and used across ActiveMQ
5.x/Artemis/Apollo. The code was since pulled back into ActiveMQ 5.x
to accommo
As proposed and discussed at the following links:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-source-code-reorg-update-tt7641526.html
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-Subversion-reorganization-proposal-tt7639094.html
https://github.com/ssorj/qpid-svn-reorg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
Hi, everyone. I'm now in the midst of getting the various CI environments
working, adding some temporary valgrind suppressions and fixing
incompatibilities with various versions of the buildchain tools.
After CI is in suitably good shape, I would like to start the process to
migrate qpid-cpp and
Hello,
*@Chuck,*
I took a look at Qpid C++ broker model but the main issue is it is C++
oriented whereas the dispatcher is mainly C. I tried to switch the compiler
of Visual studio to C++ and got a lot of errors. So I prefer to stay on a
full C approach for the time being to gain time.
*@Alan,*
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
