Re: gitattributes

2016-09-01 Thread Volker Diels-Grabsch
Matt Broadstone schrieb: > Would it be possible to fix up the .gitattributes for the qpid-cpp git > repository? I'm having an incredibly hard time updating the sources for the > debian packaging because there are many mixed in CRLF files throughout the > repository (seemingly without rhyme or reaso

gitattributes

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Broadstone
Hey all, Would it be possible to fix up the .gitattributes for the qpid-cpp git repository? I'm having an incredibly hard time updating the sources for the debian packaging because there are many mixed in CRLF files throughout the repository (seemingly without rhyme or reason either, i.e. not all

Re: Questions: Next Receiver Functionality

2016-09-01 Thread Flores, Paul A.
Gordon thanks for the quick response. Looks like we are going to need to manage multiple sessions; one specific to asynchronous processing and another for synchronous. Plan will be to utilize "next_receiver" for asynchronous processing and create unique senders and receivers for synchronous pr

Re: Questions: Next Receiver Functionality

2016-09-01 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/09/16 17:52, Flores, Paul A. wrote: Hi, Working at a client site and have run into an interesting question. The current implementation plan is to use a unique "reply to" address (queue) to handle synchronous request reply. At this point we have a local broker so we have a single conne

Questions: Next Receiver Functionality

2016-09-01 Thread Flores, Paul A.
Hi, Working at a client site and have run into an interesting question. The current implementation plan is to use a unique "reply to" address (queue) to handle synchronous request reply. At this point we have a local broker so we have a single connection with a single session. We are also p

[HEADS UP] JMS client 0.11.0 release etc

2016-09-01 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi folks, Just a heads up that I'll be looking at doing a 0.11.0 JMS client release next week, likely cutting earlier in the week to hopefully allow completing later in the week. Beyond that, I'll likely skip master a little up to 0.20.0-SNAPSHOT so it can begin taking work on implementing JMS 2

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Ken Giusti
My bad - we've never exactly publicized that behavior. :) - Original Message - > From: "Gordon Sim" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 9:09:36 AM > Subject: Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0? > > On 01/09/16 13:44, Ken Giusti wrote: > > > > > > - Original

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/09/16 13:44, Ken Giusti wrote: - Original Message - From: "Gordon Sim" To: users@qpid.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 8:32:15 AM Subject: Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0? On 01/09/16 09:29, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote: So I have to switch from a pure-Python impleme

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Ken Giusti
- Original Message - > From: "Gordon Sim" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 8:32:15 AM > Subject: Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0? > > On 01/09/16 09:29, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote: > > So I have to switch from a pure-Python implementation to a C library >

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/09/16 09:29, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote: So I have to switch from a pure-Python implementation to a C library with Python wrapper. This is inconvenient for deployment, but not a show stopper for me. I compiled qpid-proton on my own, where some questions arose: 1) Is it possible to build

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Ken Giusti
Hi Volker, I would recommend you use the python-qpid-proton package available at the pypi repository: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-qpid-proton/0.14.0 The package setup script will automagically check to see if the proton-c library has been installed and will use it if available. Otherw

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Qpid C++ 1.35.0

2016-09-01 Thread Justin Ross
The release is approved with six binding votes in favor and none against. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Justin Ross wrote: > +1 > > I tested on Windows 10, Fedora 23, and Fedora 24. Windows had the same > long-standing test failures. > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Justin Ross > wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid C++ 1.35.0

2016-09-01 Thread Justin Ross
+1 I tested on Windows 10, Fedora 23, and Fedora 24. Windows had the same long-standing test failures. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > The artifacts proposed for release: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/cpp/1.35.0-rc/ > > Please indicate your vote belo

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Jakub Scholz
Hi Volker, You can have a look here: https://github.com/Eurex-Clearing-Messaging-Interfaces/Python-Code-Examples In the proton_binding subdirectory there are examples with SSL client authentication for both blocking and non blocking connection. Hope this helps. Jakub On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Volker Diels-Grabsch
Gordon Sim schrieb: > Use the proton library for python. There is an overview, a tutorial, some > examples and an API reference of sorts: > https://qpid.apache.org/proton/index.html. Feel free also to ask questions > on this list. Another question. I need SSL with client cert. That is, using the

Re: qpid-cpp and BerkeleyDB

2016-09-01 Thread Petr Kubat
Gordon Sim wrote > We don't have any plan as yet (mainly because we were unaware of the > license change really). If we can stay on the older release for now, > that would give us time to figure out a change. What is your timeframe > for removing BDB? We don't have a timeframe yet (other than "

Re: Python support for AMQP 1.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Volker Diels-Grabsch
Gordon Sim schrieb: > On 31/08/16 18:26, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote: > > In other words, how is a Python program meant to communicate with an > > AMQP 1.0 server? [...] > Use the proton library for python. There is an overview, a tutorial, some > examples and an API reference of sorts: > https://qp

Re: Help: Qpid shuts down itself automatically - Java qpid 0.32

2016-09-01 Thread Bhargav Bhalerao
Hi Lorenz Thanks for the details. I had a feeling that if heartbeat is not set and AMQP connection is idle for long time then it will be auto closed, hence heartbeat is set. Also at the moment qpid broker and my application are running on same linux machine. Is it like I dont need heartbeat at a

Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-09-01 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi Ram, I don't think the JMX plugin supports anonymous access - it always requires a username and password (so will need to be associated with a Plain or other password based authentication provider) -- Rob On 30 August 2016 at 18:56, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote: > Any one have any idea why m

Re: Help: Qpid shuts down itself automatically - Java qpid 0.32

2016-09-01 Thread Lorenz Quack
Hello Bhargav, there is no "best value" for heartbeating. It all depends. Normally a TCP does not need heartbeating at all. It is usually used for two purposes * a simplistic sanity check that the other side is in a healthy state (e.g., does not "hang") * to prevent NATs or firewall from

Re: Help: Qpid shuts down itself automatically - Java qpid 0.32

2016-09-01 Thread Bhargav Bhalerao
Hi Rob Yesterday we started qpid broker and my app in background and great news is that it was still up and running today morning. The issue is resolved. Thank you very much for your prompt and accurate guidance. I wanted to ask one more thing. What is the best value for heartbeat, provided all