Re: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:16 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote: > > > > > > Just an idea: > > > Would it be feasible for the router to only send the reply ATTACH frame > > > for the receiver link creation once the address was propagated to all > nodes > > > of

Re: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:58 PM Ganesh Murthy wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:48 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < > carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote: > >> > > > we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. >> > > > A client is connected to router instance A and has opened a

RE: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

> > > > Just an idea: > > Would it be feasible for the router to only send the reply ATTACH frame > > for the receiver link creation once the address was propagated to all nodes > > of the router network? And maybe activating that behaviour via a Qpid > > configuration option. > > > Since this is

Re: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:48 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote: > > > > we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. > > > > A client is connected to router instance A and has opened a receiver > link > > > > on address addrA. > > > > *After* having

RE: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

> > > we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. > > > A client is connected to router instance A and has opened a receiver link > > > on address addrA. > > > *After* having received the ATTACH frame for this, > > > another client on another machine which is connected to router

Re: Need help to fix "javax.jms.MessageNotReadableException: Message body is write-only"

On 8/29/19 5:04 AM, A K wrote: Hi Timothy And Team, I posted below details through web ui http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html  but latest comment and new topic is not reflecting on UI. I think, there is some issue on UI. ### We are having one issue, so

Re: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:20 PM Ganesh Murthy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:50 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < > carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've a question regarding the following scenario: > > > > we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. > > A

Re: [Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:50 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've a question regarding the following scenario: > > we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. > A client is connected to router instance A and has opened a receiver link >

Re: [Qpid Dispatch Router] Question about qdstat default option

Thanks all for your feedback. I have checked in the changes to master branch. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:26 PM Ken Giusti wrote: > +1 to implied -g and not implying "--all-entities" in the case of > "--all-routers" (or ever, for that matter). > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:22 AM Ted Ross

[Dispatch Router] Anon-relay sender link - rejected msgs, timing issue

Hi, I've a question regarding the following scenario: we have a network of 3 Qpid dispatch router instances. A client is connected to router instance A and has opened a receiver link on address addrA. *After* having received the ATTACH frame for this, another client on another machine which is

Re: [Qpid Dispatch Router] Question about qdstat default option

+1 to implied -g and not implying "--all-entities" in the case of "--all-routers" (or ever, for that matter). On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:22 AM Ted Ross wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:05 AM Gordon Sim wrote: > > > On 29/08/2019 4:00 pm, Chuck Rolke wrote: > > > 1. A naked qdstat return

Re: [Qpid Dispatch Router] Question about qdstat default option

On 29/08/2019 4:00 pm, Chuck Rolke wrote: 1. A naked qdstat return "Router statistics" is a good idea. A naked qdstat return an error is annoying. 2. The simple "--all-routers" returning "--all-routers --all-entities" is too much. Changing "--all-routers" with no other switches to be

Re: [Qpid Dispatch Router] Question about qdstat default option

1. A naked qdstat return "Router statistics" is a good idea. A naked qdstat return an error is annoying. 2. The simple "--all-routers" returning "--all-routers --all-entities" is too much. Changing "--all-routers" with no other switches to be "--all-routers -g" is better. +1 to both

[Qpid Dispatch Router] Question about qdstat default option

Hello All, As part of enhancement https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1374, executing qdsat with no options would default to qdstat -g (--general). Prior to this enhancement, running qdstat with no options would look like this - [gmurthy@localhost qpid-dispatch]$ qdstat Usage:

Need help to fix "javax.jms.MessageNotReadableException: Message body is write-only"

Hi Timothy And Team, I posted below details through web ui http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html but latest comment and new topic is not reflecting on UI. I think, there is some issue on UI. ### We are having one issue, so need your to help to fix this issue.