Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.33.3

2019-12-03 Thread Timothy Bish
On 12/3/19 1:23 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.33.3 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.33.3-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at: htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/12/2019 5:59 pm, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: Gordon, You can use use one of maven surefire plugin exclude mechanisms. The simplest way is to build with an option '-Dtest=!SpnegoAuthenticatorTest,!KerberosAuthenticationManagerTest' Thanks! Skipping those and also org.apache.qpid.server.loggin

[VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.33.3

2019-12-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.33.3 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.33.3-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Alex has replied showing how to can just exclude those specific tests. More generally though, what you see is just standard maven behaviour for a multi-module builds where if a module (via tests in this case) build fails then the overall build stops after that unless instructed otherwise, presumab

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Gordon, You can use use one of maven surefire plugin exclude mechanisms. The simplest way is to build with an option '-Dtest=!SpnegoAuthenticatorTest,!KerberosAuthenticationManagerTest' Alternatively, you can specify exclude file using option -Dsurefire.excludesFile=/path/to/exclude/file. For exa

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/12/2019 5:07 pm, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: Hi Gordon. The tests from test suites KerberosAuthenticationManagerTest and SpnegoAuthenticatorTest are failing sporadically in Apache Jenkins builds. I have not seen them failing locally on my machine. I suspect that it is an issue with embedded Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Hi Gordon. The tests from test suites KerberosAuthenticationManagerTest and SpnegoAuthenticatorTest are failing sporadically in Apache Jenkins builds. I have not seen them failing locally on my machine. I suspect that it is an issue with embedded Apache Kerby implementation of Kerberos server. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/12/2019 10:28 am, Alex Rudyy wrote: Hi all, I built release artefacts for Qpid Broker-J version 7.1.6 RC1. Please, give them a test out and vote accordingly. The source and binary archives can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/broker-j/7.1.6-rc1/ The maven artifact

RE: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread VERMEULEN Olivier
+1 Launched our validation pipeline which includes: - basic sends and receives - basic routing and filtering - JDBC message and config stores - message recovery - HTTP management and statistics - TTL, max queue size and max message size - SSL and SASL - performance benchmark Olivier -Origina

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.6

2019-12-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
+1 I checked things over as below: - Verified the signature and checksum files. - Used mvn apache-rat:check to verify the headers in the source archive. - Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files present in the archives. - Started brokers from the binary archive, created queues using the console, on JDK

Python Proton Reactor get_connection_address attempts to call non-existent connection.get_address method

2019-12-03 Thread Bourne, Mark
With Python Proton version 0.29.0, the `get_connection_address` method of `proton.reactor.Reactor` attempts to call `connection.get_address()`. However, that method doesn't seem to exist, leading to an exception. Code to reproduce this is attached (demo.py - also copied at the end of this mess

Re: High number of transfers between Broker-J and Dispatch-Router

2019-12-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Yes, I was suggesting potential for improvement around that aspect. If you care about the [network] performance though, the simpler suggestion is just to not operate your consumer in such fashion (receive 1 msg, close) if possible and so avoid the situation, which I believe only happens when the f