On 02/04/2013 11:59 AM, Steve Huston wrote:
> Ok, good. I was concerned because I've heard of a major possible AMQP using
> community who elected not to use AMQP because of the lack of broker
> federation standardization.
I find that amusing, someone would rather select something entirely
propri
or if qpidd is pinned to socket, set it to the core count of the socket
+1. If you pin, pin to the second scocket, pin OS to core 0, socket 0.
If only one socket, set to core count +1
Carl.
On 12/02/2012 04:59 PM, Cliff Jansen wrote:
> The default varies from machine to machine and if N is t
Gordon,
This is coming along really nicely..
Carl.
On 10/03/2012 05:14 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> I had to juggle the tasks in my previously published milestones a
> little (specifically work waiting for PROTON-9 was pushed back a bit).
>
> My current plan is:
>
> ---
On 07/23/2012 05:07 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I definitely do not see any problem in sacrificing the features like
> LVQ. I'm not so sure about browsing ... do we need to disable browsing
> to have the real flow to disk queue? If yes, what about multiple
> consumers connected to the sa
On 07/23/2012 07:40 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> Yes, the use of flow-to-disk queues unfortunately doesn't solve the
> memory issue on 100%. It just decreases the memory consumption, so the
> point when the broker runs out of memory is postponed a bit.
>
>
we actually need 'real' flow to disk queue h
On 07/20/2012 12:20 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 05:12 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> So the thoughts are to have large message support via grouping which
>> would also then need large queue support. I.e. design better larger
>> queue support and have large message supp
On 07/20/2012 05:52 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
> Large message support (distinct from large queue support, which is
> what flow-to-disk currently attempts to address) is not currently
> supported anyway; the maximum size of message is limited by the
> available memory.
>
I know
> I think some form o
>
> features to drop are:
>
> (i) legacy lvq modes; lvq support would still remain, only the two old
> and peculiar modes would go; I really doubt anyone actually depends on
> these anyway, they were more a limitation than a feature
+1
>
> (ii) asynchronous queue replication; solution is not mat
Late to the thread -- why not use cqpid swig lib to erlang?
On 05/25/2012 03:51 AM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Introduction of new java brokers just to bridge erlang or any other clients
> is like to shoot sparrows with a cannon to my mind. It's a pity that amqp
> protocol vers
qpid-stat gives most of that info using qmf.. Thus 1& 2 quite easy to do.
There is also a JMX bridge QMan, (3). Not sure how well maintained it is.
Carl.
On 05/16/2012 02:29 PM, oggie wrote:
> While evaluating QPid, I also need to determine if it can be monitored
> easily. Our current monitori
I was chatting to Kim about this, this week and I believe we should do
something along these lines (custom memory allocator) for quite a few
reasons.
Carl.
On 05/03/2012 05:42 PM, CLIVE wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Just one other thought. On other multi-threaded applications I have
> usually found a si
Spread the word/ come join us!
http://www.ovirt.org/news-and-events/workshop/
Carl.
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
Here is the JMS example
http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.12/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch03s04.html
On 12/20/2011 12:55 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> Take a look at this section of the doc
>
> http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.12/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch02s11.html
>
&
Take a look at this section of the doc
http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.12/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch02s11.html
examples for C++, .NET and JMS.
Carl.
On 12/20/2011 12:46 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> ISTR reading at one point that the .NET binding is a SWIG wrapper
> around the C
Or, use the mapped message support in Java(JMS) and.NET. The docs on
that are quite good and it uses the AMQP type system which means you get
full interop across languages, platforms etc.
I know quite a few people use it expressly for JMS <-> .NET message interop.
Carl.
On 12/20/2011 05:04 AM
no, just drop the tcp option from your connection address if in use. If
not, then I'll let Kim pick up and comment on the thread.
Carl.
On 12/06/2011 02:25 PM, dmounessa wrote:
> I am using geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
>
> Do I need a new version? was this released?
>
>
>
> --
> View this m
On 12/06/2011 01:01 PM, dmounessa wrote:
> 2. It seems that No-Persistent Queue without Store Module and Topic should
> have same throughput. However, I see the queues that are not
> durable/non-persistence messages have worse message rate per second than
> sending the messages to the topic --
> I
nice, looking forward to the patch...
Carl.
On 11/10/2011 02:16 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
> Hi chaps,
> for info I'm (finally!!) really close to finishing my Java
> implementation of the QMF2 API. It's pretty fully featured including
> Subscriptions on the Agent class (my test Agent is the mysti
do a make clean, and rerun configure.
Carl.
On 11/09/2011 03:50 PM, Joe Porto wrote:
> Doing a yum intall of libuuid-devel worked!
>
> Thanks guys for the fast response!
>
> However, now the make fails…
>
>
> libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.4 but the
> libtool: definition o
09/2011 09:56 AM, Kimberly Palko wrote:
>>> Really? Can you give me an example because I get asked about SOAP and
>> REST from the SA's pretty frequently.
>>> Kim
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Carl Trieloff"
>>
works across languages, clients etc.
Carl.
On 11/09/2011 09:56 AM, Kimberly Palko wrote:
> Really? Can you give me an example because I get asked about SOAP and REST
> from the SA's pretty frequently.
> Kim
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Carl Trielof
SOAP over Qpid has been done using the cxf project quite frequently.
Carl.
On 11/08/2011 03:19 PM, Daryoush Mehrtash wrote:
> I am looking into possibility of proxy-ing SOAP and/or REST interface over
> messaging (QPID). Any suggestions? Good starting point?
>
> Thanks
>
> Daryoush
>
---
On 10/20/2011 11:35 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 02:57 PM, surya prakash wrote:
>> I am using qpidd-10 .I am facing some problem like is send messages
>> by using
>> sync session the TPS is very low like 1TPS, I am suspecting exactly
>> one sec
>> sleep is there in Sync session , is there
If you run it cmd line it outputs the PID used to be used for the stop,
if you run as a service, it write this to a lock file.
I.e. if you want to use
service qpidd stop
then add the auth no to the conf file and use
service qpidd start
regards
Carl.
On 10/19/2011 03:18 PM, rezajoon wrote:
>
start the broker with qpidd --auth no
to disable authentication, or add that to the conf file.
PS. qpidd --help will provide all the options that can be set cmd line
or in the conf file.
regards
Carl.
On 10/18/2011 07:28 PM, rezajoon wrote:
> I have Qpid installed (latest version) and I am tr
On 10/05/2011 11:07 AM, Wisler, Trina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a queue setup with max message count of 100 and as a ring queue. The
> single client creating that queue will consume 1 message and then wait
> indefinitely (for the purpose of my test). I am producing a total of 250
> messages. As
I'll put my other hat on and provide a few comments.
On 09/21/2011 01:49 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
>
> I'm seeking some objective guidance about the differences between
> RedHat MRG and Apache Qpid Open Source.
>
> There has been some discussion in my organisation about whether we
> should go down
On 09/16/2011 09:41 AM, Alan Conway wrote:
>
> In general qpidd is not designed to re-set configuration on the fly.
> Resetting log levels would be straightforward. I'm not sure about ACL.
> Include it in the JIRA and we'll see what can be done.
ACL can be reset on the fly.
place a new ACL file
level? Also, could
> this cause memory bloat relative to the number of messages if it is threads
> that are pooled? This seems unlikely to me.
>
> Jeff
>
> ____
> From: Carl Trieloff [cctriel...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 0
.04
>
> From: Carl Trieloff [cctriel...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:25 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: qpidd using approx 10x memory
>
> What OS version?
>
> Carl.
>
>
> On 09/08/2011 11:53 AM, Je
make the queue durable on create, but do not set the durable bit on
message publish. That should do it for you
Carl.
On 09/08/2011 11:47 AM, rfallon wrote:
> All,
>
> I want durable queues that DO NOT persist the messages, i.e. I want my
> configuration to survive a restart but (as a perform
What OS version?
Carl.
On 09/08/2011 11:53 AM, Jeff Armstrong wrote:
> Does anyone have thoughts on this? Should this be submitted in the issue
> tracker?
>
> From: Jeff Armstrong [jarmstr...@avvasi.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 3:08 PM
> To: us
That sounds like a pain. If it happens again, jump into #asfinfra on
freenode and ask. Also ping me when it happens and we can try figure it out.
Carl.
On 08/26/2011 06:55 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mentioned this in another message, but I haven't received any
> messages to this list t
Which broker are you using? I'm assuming the Java broker based on Derby
question
The C++ broker with the msg store has been bench-marked at lot is a
great performer for most use cases. There are a few use-cases we are
still working on. I can point you to some info setup if you would like
Carl.
On 08/10/2011 02:09 PM, Daryoush Mehrtash wrote:
> Thanks Alan. I found out that I was missing saslpasswd2 package. I
> installed it and It builds now.
>
> It does take forever (30 minute or so) to do the build on my Ubuntu image
> running in a Mac Book.
>
> Is that build time normal, or doe
I speak under correction, but I believe there is a QMF event for this,
running qpid-printevents would print if there is one.
if not, we should add one.
Carl.
On 08/05/2011 02:20 PM, Jeff Armstrong wrote:
> I would like to be able to detect the situation where adding messages to a
> queue c
cut and paste from justin
"Hi, everyone. There have been no changes to the 0.12 release branch
since our last RC. There is, however, a new blocker issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3394
The proposed fix passes initial inspection, so I anticipate this will be
resolved in the
On 08/02/2011 02:40 PM, prasanth baireddy wrote:
> Hi,
> Iam using apache qpid(java) 0.10 in my application.The scenario is the
> application should support connecting to 100 applications at the same time
> for message exchanges.
> Can apche qpid provide clustering support for this.Please suugest u
on Fedora you can just yum install it
RHEL you can yum install MRG.
hope that helps...
it would be good to get updated packages into Ubuntu
Carl.
On 07/28/2011 11:01 AM, Nithesh Shetty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To install qpid on linux we have to install a long list of independent
> components.
>
> I
Ken,
QMFv2 solves this issue, can't we port the tools to QMFv2?
Carl.
On 07/21/2011 01:47 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Alan's correct - I *believe* (not looking at the code in the debugger ATM)
> that qpid-config is most likely downloading the broker schema data on
> connection, and perhaps parsi
On 07/13/2011 02:32 PM, Jeff Armstrong wrote:
> Is there some way to get the qpid version through the C++ API? I would prefer
> not to hardcode the version number, but I can't find anything in the
> documentation.
> -
> Apache Qp
The brokers have loop detection build in, is there more info on the
specific config
you are using?
Carl.
On 07/13/2011 12:53 PM, djohn...@princeton.com wrote:
> I'm trying to use queue routes to federate messages between two brokers.
> Depending on the scenario, I sometimes end up with an inf
On 06/30/2011 12:50 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 05:36 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> On 06/30/2011 12:21 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is it possible for a client to recover the "--default-queue-limit"
>>>> for a
>>>&g
On 06/30/2011 12:36 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 12:21 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>> 1) Is it possible for a client to recover the "--default-queue-limit"
>>> for a
>>> broker?
>> No, I'm afraid not.
> This should however be trivial
On 06/30/2011 12:21 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>
>> 1) Is it possible for a client to recover the "--default-queue-limit"
>> for a
>> broker?
>
> No, I'm afraid not.
This should however be trivial to add and quite useful.
add an R param for it to management-schema.xml, and the initialize it in
the c
On 06/07/2011 08:02 PM, Anthony Foglia wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 02:58 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
>> API (3) is a literal/mechanical binding of the C++ API in Python. Our
>> intent is to provide a thin Python wrapper around this binding that is a
>> drop-in replacement for API(2). The benefits of this API ar
On 05/05/2011 03:43 PM, Frédéric Logier wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 10:40 -0400, Carl Trieloff a écrit :
>> On 05/05/2011 07:40 AM, Frédéric Logier wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to see the new version 0.10 of qpid, but I'm really disappointed
On 05/05/2011 07:40 AM, Frédéric Logier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm happy to see the new version 0.10 of qpid, but I'm really disappointed
> to not find the ruby client, so what about it ? is it abandonned ?
It is there, a nice new shinny one.. that can also use all the C++
transports like RDMA etc, I'm
This would be a great enhancement, if you could JIRA it.
On 04/15/2011 10:23 AM, Jonas Klemming wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I need to setup hundreds of ACLs that lets users create/publish/subscribe to
> only their own queues. Is it possible to create a ACL rule like this:
>
>
>
> "acl allow publish
If the file got deleted, then Linux will let you continue to log to the
FD, tossing the contents to dev null.
Do you have log rotation setup, alternately, you can configure the log
to syslog option.
Basically if you run a production broker with logging on, then you need
to select a log manageme
1. Can you tell by calling getContentType whether to call getContent or
getContentPtr or getProperties, or does that
require the sender to set the content type? Is there a convention or is there
a helping class like possibly Variant?
In most cases it requires the sender to set it. If y
On 03/02/2011 08:40 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
aybe I have not properly understood LVQ. I thought that LVQ allows to
read messages in reverse order. It is a nice feature to have, so that we
will be able to read the most recent messages in the first place.
That would most likely nee
do any of the other clients connect? i.e. firewall, iptables, etc ??
Carl.
On 02/07/2011 01:49 AM, SanathPrudhvi wrote:
Hi,
I am using C++ broker with .net client
I am getting error while connecting to my C++ broker.
Error is "Failed to Connect". I am using default settings.
server n
yes, that is correct.
One note is that if you use cman as a quorum manager, it will not let
you get
down to 1 node unless you set weights in your cman config.
Carl.
On 02/07/2011 01:46 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
Hi Gordon,
So, if a queue is --durable, no persistent messages w
On 02/03/2011 08:35 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using qpid 0.8 and I'd like to use cluster durable queues.
Here is my test case:
1. Start a cluster that contains two nodes.
2. Create cluster durable queue: qpid-config add queue MyQueue
--cluster-durable
3. Kill one no
On 01/11/2011 09:53 AM, Sanath_Prudhvi wrote:
Dear All,
First of all thanks for your co-operation to install C++ broker
and run in my system.
I am using C#.Net Client with VS 2008.
I want to know about setting priority for the messages.
1. Does C++ broker supports message prio
On 12/08/2010 09:57 AM, Adam Kaminiecki wrote:
Hi,
Can anybody give me a link to api documentation??
I'm interested in some variables but I dont know what they exacly do.
MessageAcceptMode.EXPLICIT
This means the message is not dequeued from the queue until you
explicitly accept the message
On 12/01/2010 01:26 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
Should I
define queues durable to get this behavior of persistent ?
yes, you need to mark the queue persistent. and the messages you want
durable... i.e. you can put transient messages on a durable queue.
Carl.
--
On 12/01/2010 08:01 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/01/2010 12:57 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
I agree that bumping the nofile limit should get around the error. But,
first consider if you expected that you'd need over 1000 sockets open.
If you expected you'd be using far fewer than that, then looking fo
On 11/17/2010 09:54 PM, Wolgemuth Greg wrote:
Reply is in-line.
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:13 -0800, Thomas Nguyen wrote:
Hello,
I am testing QPID for the first time and am having trouble with messages
being routed from an exchange to a queue. I am using a C++ broker and
the Java client t
On 10/28/2010 07:23 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Chris,
I'll add my 2 cents here, but I'm sure Carl will have more to add as
well.
I think the response so far pretty much covers it. Happy to answer any
additional questions if there are.
Carl.
-
coping dpal, I know he has done some work creating a remote logger
with Qpid for a large number of systems.
Carl.
On 10/28/2010 09:00 PM, Olivier Devaux wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to QPID and looking at some log transport tools.
It looks like QPID could be used like Facebook's Scribe but would br
This may help,
Red Hat snapshots or selects a svn, and provides a stable release
for MRG independent of the Qpid release process. sometimes it may
be line up, other times not.
The MRG release also carries a patch set ontop of 0.7.946106 while
maintaining
ABI. Thus MRG is 0.7.946106 + a patch
On 10/27/2010 08:10 AM, zhaoyi0...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to know how session handle communications. There are two cases. One is
that I declared and subscribed two queues on one session. The other is that
I declared and subscribed two queues on two sessions separately. What is the
different betw
Depends if you have beer or not.. :-)
actually I don't know. expect it is open, will ask.
Carl.
On 10/27/2010 01:50 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Is this open to anyone, or only ApacheCon attendees?
//Bill
On 10/27/2010 01:15 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 10/20/2010 06:14 PM, Carl Trieloff
I would do this by setting my cyrus config to a central authority for all
federated brokers, for example IPA, AD for a LDAP DB.
Carl.
On 10/20/2010 11:43 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to centralize authentication in one broker with
federation?
Thank you,
Bruno
-
My employer will be sponsoring a Qpid meetup at ApacheCon ATL this year.
Come
meet, spread the word and learn about the project. It is the typical
free beer
event that Apache puts on!.
Scheduled for Wednesday night (3rd) at 8PM.
Carl.
There is an cman option today for that. I expect that in due course this
option
will be added for pacemarker also.
In the current cluster with the cman option specified in config, the
broker actively
checks quorum.
Carl.
On 10/19/2010 01:04 PM, Clark O'Brien wrote:
Could you use an ex
On 10/14/2010 12:50 PM, Adam Crain wrote:
I am writing the list again to ask about when qpid releases memory from queues
that become bloated and are subsequently read.
I got a response from Carl a while back who suggested the OS is the culprit and
not qpid:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod
The memory is released immediately, however don't be fooled by Linux, it
will
only do the mem consolidate when it needs to, so the process will 'look'
bloated
even though it is not.
It is more efficiently for the OS to only return the mem when required
to do so.
Carl.
On 10/07/2010 05:
setting TCP no-delay makes a massive difference for txns, try with that
set on the broker and on the client connection.
On 10/06/2010 02:49 AM, barys_ilyusho...@troika.ru wrote:
Andrew,
Thank you very much for your response.
I have performed several tests with java cliens and c++ broker and
On 10/01/2010 03:05 PM, shailesh wrote:
Hi Folks,
[I am using the C++ API talking to a C++ qpid broker 0.6]
My application that uses qpid, prints errors to stderr (for example, when a
connection to the qpid server fails),
and I'd like to control/customize where the output is sent to.
I underst
On 09/29/2010 10:28 AM, wdrozd wrote:
I saw on the site that Apache QPID is compatible with 0-9 and 0-10, but is it
compatible with 0-9-1? Also, is there a reason to go with AMQP 0-10 over
0-9-1?
Thanks,
Bill
Thanks for post the Q here.
The C++ broker on supports 0-10, the Java broker su
On 09/24/2010 02:53 PM, Clive Lilley wrote:
On 24/09/2010 18:05, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
Hi Clive,
I am not sure about this feature in Qpid.
You can simply use an ESB infront of Qpid and configure ESB to send
the message to Qpid instance .. so you have to directly talk to the
proxy in you
On 09/08/2010 09:25 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the replay.
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 08:16 -0400, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I'm trying some SASL authentication methods, buts Cyrus SASL
does not have support for MS SQL Server databases, there is
"a" or any way to aut
On 09/03/2010 09:23 AM, Robert Żmigrodzki wrote:
I have a problem with recovering a persistent cluster after a clean
shutdown. Here is my scenario:
Fedora 13
yum install qpidd-cluster
yum install qpidc-devel
yum install amqp python-qpid
yum install rhm
qpidd -p5672 --cluster-name=MY_CLUSTER
I would say, open a connection, with a heartbeat configured, so to get a
success/ failure
within 2x heartbeat.
Carl.
On 08/27/2010 05:47 AM, Daniel Sack wrote:
Hi,
We are working with qpid 0.6 c++ broker and .net clients.
The question is how can we check from a .Net client if the qpid br
On 08/23/2010 06:43 PM, MHT wrote:
So presume the tcpdump shows that the packet only gets as far as the multicast
address but nothing receiving? Sorry, I'm a numpty when it comes to networks.
Also, the Reporter column in /proc/net/igmp shows all zeros. The servers that
host the nodes where there
Do you have firewall port open for AIS traffic?
Carl.
On 08/20/2010 11:56 AM, MHT wrote:
Hi,
On a working cluster I see the expected node joins in logs for both boxes:
[TOTEM] entering OPERATIONAL state.
[CLM ] got nodejoin message
[CLM ] got nodejoin message
But on this problem
It can also be downloaded here http://qpidcomponents.org/
On 08/12/2010 06:49 PM, Donohue, Matt wrote:
I've used the MRG Messaging install Red Hat has for this.
It's python based and called Cumin.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: PengXian Sui [mailto:suipengx...@hotmail.com]
S
Tests from MRG rpms are done as follow:
perftest results are transfers per second, as that is what perftest reports
latency test are messages per second as that is what latency test reports.
Note that the 33% increase is an old paper, pre RHEL 5.4 note that RHEL5.4
now has an updated memory a
The C++ broker will 'batch' TCP writes if the message rate is higher
than the IOPs.
Carl.
On 07/21/2010 12:06 PM, Bruno Matos wrote:
Hello,
I'm working with a very little size messages, about 50 bytes, but with a
big rate. This ends up with a lot of overhead making TCP packets.
There is
On 07/09/2010 08:27 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
On 9 July 2010 12:50, Bruno Matos wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:22 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
The only options would be what we have, or have an ACL policy that sets
the rate for a specific user or
group of users, (which we don't
On 07/08/2010 09:16 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/08/2010 02:15 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 07/08/2010 09:10 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to control the broker's QoS for authenticated users,
like
bandwidth or dequeue rate?
yes,
rate can be controlled by setting
On 07/08/2010 09:10 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to control the broker's QoS for authenticated users, like
bandwidth or dequeue rate?
yes,
rate can be controlled by setting
--max-session-rate MESSAGES/S (0) Sets the maximum message rate per
On 07/07/2010 05:23 PM, sammykanan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to get the 0.6 C++ client app to negociate with a Java broker
where I have excluded version 0-10 (for reasons I won't try and explain).
When it connects I get the error:
2010-07-07 22:13:48 error IO worker thread exiting with unhan
On 06/30/2010 08:20 PM, cflockhart wrote:
Hello,
I know this is possible in ActiveMQ and they call it a "virtual topic".
What we want is for a particular topic subscriber (durable) to have failover
and load balancing amongst consumer instances. In regular JMS you can't do
it because the server on
I build with 1.41, but I know it works with boost versions from RHEL4
and later.
If on RHEL 4 there is a patch in the repo to get it to compile / with
the older version of boost in RHEL4.
From FC6 and RHEL5, onwards boost version packaged should cause no issues.
Carl.
On 06/30/2010 11:23
On 06/28/2010 06:29 PM, Wes Parish wrote:
Is it possible to connect to a pre-defined ring queue using JMS in browse mode?
If so, are there any examples?
yes, I believe you need to turn of the queue auto create from JMS.
Rajith can provide more detailed example.
Please correct me if
You can however setup the ring queue with qpid-config or from any other
client,
and then consume from it from JMS.
On 06/25/2010 10:29 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Not with 1.2.
However from 1.3 you will be able to setup such a queue using the new
addressing syntax.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at
On 05/19/2010 12:24 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 05/19/2010 04:42 PM, John Skopis wrote:
My conclusion is that persistent messages are load balanced via
multiple routes, but only when there is more than one session active
on the source broker.
Non-persistent messages are load balanced via multiple r
On 04/09/2010 01:39 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 8 Apr 2010, at 13:16, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 04/07/2010 03:36 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:30, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:02, Alan Conway wrote:
On 03/30/2010 05:38 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I&#x
This can be done with the qpid python libs, there are a few threads on
the list already on the topic.
If you can't locate them in the archive, shout, and we can maybe post an
example and post it on the
wiki.
Carl.
On 04/07/2010 05:04 AM, Kiss Péter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm quite new to
On 04/07/2010 03:36 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:30, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:02, Alan Conway wrote:
On 03/30/2010 05:38 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently run some tests to try and see how much overhead
clustering
brings. In short - I saw
On 03/30/2010 10:28 AM, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Nicolae,
I have installed qpid-0.6 broker from sources on my CentOS
5.4 box and it bugs me with excessive warnings of timer:
2010-03-30 16:26:48 warning Timer woken up 706ms late
In my previous qpid-0.5 everything was fine.
***What could
, etc, so just don't try to set very
aggressive heartbeats and
you should be fine.
Carl.
On 03/30/2010 09:52 AM, nicolae claudius wrote:
Yes it is a virtual machine for testing purposes.
*From:* Carl Trieloff
*To:*
Are you running on a single core box?
Carl.
On 03/30/2010 09:34 AM, nicolae claudius wrote:
I have installed qpid-0.6 broker from sources on my CentOS 5.4 box and it bugs
me with excessive warnings of timer:
2010-03-30 16:26:48 warning Timer woken up 706ms late
In my previous qpid-0.
On 03/11/2010 02:22 AM, Arati Sethy wrote:
Hello,
May I know how to set "qpid.file_count"& "qpid.file_size" in declare
queues as an argument for C++ broker.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arati
There is a helper class -- QueueOptions.h in the client headers.
Take a look at it
Carl.
On 03/02/2010 09:16 AM, Joan Bellver Faus wrote:
Hello, thank you for your contribution, but i only was interested in
using Java code, not python, or tools such as qpid-tool, in any case
thank you very much.
Finally i think i have solved the problem, my example code, by if
someone could also
On 03/01/2010 09:10 AM, Joan Bellver Faus wrote:
Quoting Carl Trieloff :
On 03/01/2010 07:19 AM, Joan Bellver Faus wrote:
Quoting Carl Trieloff :
yes, place the new file and then there is a QMF method that can be
called to relaod
the ACL. If the new ACL file has errors, the old files
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
