On 04/09/2014 07:50 PM, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
There would have to be queueing in and out on all devices and the server
(B). B can accept responsibility as "storage proxy". If there is a
message from A to C, B would enqueue it for delivery to C. Then A can
dequeue it as soon as B holds it.
In
Den 09. april 2014 19:41, skrev Gordon Sim:
On 04/09/2014 03:28 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
I've set this scenario up on my test system (I had to add "--argument
domain=BrokerB" to the "qpid-config add incoming|outgoing ..."
commands...)
Sorry!
and it looks promising, except if I understand
On 04/09/2014 03:28 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
I've set this scenario up on my test system (I had to add "--argument
domain=BrokerB" to the "qpid-config add incoming|outgoing ..." commands...)
Sorry!
and it looks promising, except if I understand correctly there is no
queuing on the relaying
On 8 April 2014 15:41, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>
>> We are particularly interested in your comment "...qpidd (which supports
>> establishing basic AMQP 1.0 links to/from other processes)..."; Chris've
>> tried things like adding a link from a broker to a router with
>> "qpid-route link add..." but t
On 04/04/2014 11:01 AM, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
Hi Gordon,
I'm working with Chris on this, as he is off-line for the time being, I
post some additional questions:
Could you please expand on how the dispatch router could be incorporated
into our topology? Specifically, we don't see how to set u
On 04/04/2014 06:01 AM, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
Hi Gordon,
I'm working with Chris on this, as he is off-line for the time being, I
post some additional questions:
Could you please expand on how the dispatch router could be incorporated
into our topology? Specifically, we don't see how to set
Hello Tor Rune
Re: "
We are particularly interested in your comment "...qpidd (which supports
establishing basic AMQP 1.0 links to/from other processes)..."
"
I'm pretty sure that this relates to some features recently added by
Gordon to qpidd for AMQP 1.0 the main place that they have been ref
Hi Gordon,
I'm working with Chris on this, as he is off-line for the time being, I
post some additional questions:
Could you please expand on how the dispatch router could be incorporated
into our topology? Specifically, we don't see how to set up a route
between brokers via a dispatch router.
W
Thanks very much Gordon. I have had some previous endeavours with the
dispatch router (in fact I started there before switching to the broker)
and will return to that plan of attack.
I think we will still need brokers in this topology in order to queue
messages for offline clients, otherwise the r
On 03/28/2014 01:36 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Ah, now we are really opening Pandora's box! ;)
The term "client" here is actually quite a simplified term and actually
refers loosely speaking to a system managing a number of products on
that... client. Both the management system and the products
Ah, now we are really opening Pandora's box! ;)
The term "client" here is actually quite a simplified term and actually
refers loosely speaking to a system managing a number of products on
that... client. Both the management system and the products should be
individually identifiable and addressab
On 03/28/2014 11:22 AM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Static routes might be ok for a prototype, but a production system would
have many hundreds or even thousands of clients frequently being added and
removed. My assumption is that a static configuration would incur a much
higher management overhead?
On 03/28/2014 12:53 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/28/2014 11:22 AM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Static routes might be ok for a prototype, but a production system would
have many hundreds or even thousands of clients frequently being added
and
removed. My assumption is that a static configuration woul
Static routes might be ok for a prototype, but a production system would
have many hundreds or even thousands of clients frequently being added and
removed. My assumption is that a static configuration would incur a much
higher management overhead?
2014-03-28 10:51 GMT+00:00 Gordon Sim :
> On 03
On 03/27/2014 03:33 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Hi mailinglist,
I'm trying to set up a broker federation topology with a server and (for
prototyping) two clients and I need to send messages from one client to the
other, routed via the server broker since the clients will be
firewalled/NATed and
Hi mailinglist,
I'm trying to set up a broker federation topology with a server and (for
prototyping) two clients and I need to send messages from one client to the
other, routed via the server broker since the clients will be
firewalled/NATed and can not communicate directly. My understanding is
16 matches
Mail list logo
