Re: proton.reactors -> proton.reactor rename

2015-02-18 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Rafael Schloming > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > > > > > On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > > > >> This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads

Re: proton.reactors -> proton.reactor rename

2015-02-18 Thread Justin Ross
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > > > On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > >> This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads now, and there > seems > >> to be at least tacit agreement that the p

Re: proton.reactors -> proton.reactor rename

2015-02-13 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads now, and there seems >> to be at least tacit agreement that the plural doesn't make sense anymore >> now that we've seen how integrations

Re: proton.reactors -> proton.reactor rename

2015-02-13 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads now, and there seems to be at least tacit agreement that the plural doesn't make sense anymore now that we've seen how integrations/extensions will work. I'll be posting an alpha later today, but

proton.reactors -> proton.reactor rename

2015-02-13 Thread Rafael Schloming
This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads now, and there seems to be at least tacit agreement that the plural doesn't make sense anymore now that we've seen how integrations/extensions will work. I'll be posting an alpha later today, but before that I'd like to do the reactors->reactor