Re: Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread Carlos Rovira
That's the point Hugo, I think people is starting to put and eye on Web Assembly. By adopting Royale, that change could be more easy than going from a pure JS framework El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 12:28, hferreira () escribió: > "This is the most compelling reason to me." > Yes, I agree. > Last d

Re: Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread hferreira
"This is the most compelling reason to me." Yes, I agree. Last decade was Flash, yesterday was AIR, today is JS but tomorrow could be something else and it would be easier to target again new technology. -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/

Re: Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread Harbs
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 1:02 PM, hferreira wrote: > > 1. Flash offers runtime type checking which helps catch bugs. > This means that I can target JS and quickly switch to SWF just for debug ? It depends. If your app relies on browser APIs, no. If it’s only Royale framework code, yes. > Can't

Re: Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread hferreira
1. Flash offers runtime type checking which helps catch bugs. This means that I can target JS and quickly switch to SWF just for debug ? Can't I debug now directly on VS Code + Royale JS ? I saw something on twitter that currently it's possible to debug from JS but I could be mistaken however seem

Re: Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread Harbs
Good question. 3 reasons: 1. Flash offers runtime type checking which helps catch bugs. 2. By keeping the SWF target, it forces development of the framework to be technology-agnostic as much as possible. This means that if we decide we want a native android or iOS target (for example), it will

Why SWF support

2018-11-13 Thread hferreira
Why Apache Royale supports compile to SWF to support target Flash/AIR ? Whats the point ? Sorry if this question was answer before but I did not found. I think that almost people (just not to mention everyone) will use JS SDK only ! -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/