Affected, but can wait for 2.0.3
Thanks,
Martin
Am 31.10.12 03:12, schrieb Wolfgang Sourdeau:
Le 12-10-30 18:15, mats a écrit :
Piet,
We are also experiencing this issue since upgrading to 2.0.2 and I have
reported a bug at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2086
I have noticed some
Hey,
I'm also affected from this bug. but: this only shows up for eMails
which has special character like umlaute (like ä ö ü) in the subject.
In this case the subject is displayed as
?utf-8?q?Pers=C3=B6nlicher_Kalender_wurde_erstellt?=
And the first character of the mailtext is omitted.
Just use samba4 (cldap) replication/dns mode between 2 hosts.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:04:48 -0400
Von: Carlin Hefner carlinohef...@gmail.com
An: users@sogo.nu
Betreff: Re: [SOGo] Backup Redundant System
Thank you Nathanael,
Your solution actually
I think the mentioned config is not possible.
Pay attention that even if you have the same user details in 2 different
sources, they will behave like two different SOGo users.
If you depend on Samba, then make sure that you have Samba available all
the time. Proposed SOGo config is not a way
Hey,
Am 31.10.2012 08:09, schrieb Kai Stenders:
I'm also affected from this bug.
updated the system an hour ago. Now this issue seems to be fixed.
Current nighlie version:
sogo2.0.0.20121031-1
libsope-appserver4.94.9.r1664.20121031
Am 31.10.2012 08:09, schrieb Kai Stenders:
I'm also affected from this bug. but: this only shows up for eMails
which has special character like umlaute (like ä ö ü) in the
subject. In this case the subject is displayed as
?utf-8?q?Pers=C3=B6nlicher_Kalender_wurde_erstellt?=
Not only, see
As Frederico suggests below, multimaster LDAP is the answer for LDAP.
Normal LDAP master/slave replication works too if you don't mind your
LDAP DB going read-only when failed over (in practice this isn't usually
a big deal - password changes are about the only non-IT controlled
activity
Hi Nikolaj,
Whole point of having SSL is to cover the external users including the
mobile ones. What kind of problems I could face? If I can not manage to
have both (SSL and non-SSL), in that case I would prefer to have only
SSL access.
Thanks, Igor
P.S. My previous mail had some
Seems very elegant solution even I am not very familiar with RewriteEngine.
If this is something that works for every case, I would say that putting
your proxy section in standard SOGo package would allow SOGo install
without any change of this file later (as one of the install steps).
Maybe
Hey,
I'm struggling since the beginning of using SOGo with my multi-domain setup.
Here's what it looks like working:
keySOGoEnableDomainBasedUID/key
stringYES/string
keySOGoForceIMAPLoginWithEmail/key
stringYES/string
keySOGoLoginDomains/key
array
Hello Igor Vitorac
On 2012-10-30 11:52, Igor Vitorac wrote:
I have tried to test using the resources with the same email address.
User backend is SQL (MySQL) user source and SOGo 2.0
If I configure following resources:
C Uid: room1
C Name: room1
C Cn: Meeting room1
Mail:
Thank you.
I was thinking to avoid creating email address for each resource. Since
it is mandatory, I will consider creating email alias (for each
resource) for existing SOGo system email.
Resources won't anyway use emails to Accept/Reject event invitations.
Thanks,
Igor
Christian Mack
I have a problem that only Inbox is not visible for one user.
Oct 31 13:21:59 sogod [1681]: 0x0xb62c3964[NGImap4Client]
ERROR(-[NGImap4Client _processCommandParserException:]): catched IMAP4
parser exception NGImap4ParserException: unexpected char expected (
Oct 31 13:21:59 sogod [1681]:
Having a similar issue as Alessio, sogo is up to date with the latest RPM's
qmail log:
@400050911aa739cade54 tcpserver: pid 15165 from 137.143.110.44
@400050911aa73a1d097c tcpserver: ok 15165
smtp.potsdam.edu:137.143.110.104:25 sogo.potsdam.edu:137.143.110.44::45307
Hello Emmanuel Dreyfus
On 2012-10-31 03:14, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Devinder Singh devinder.si...@qlc.in wrote:
1. Is Authentication via SAMBA necessary for Outlook Compatibility ?
This question has not been answered, but I have the same: I have an
OpenLDAP server, where users have
On 2012-10-31 02:42, Martin Rabl wrote:
Affected, but can wait for 2.0.3
Thanks,
Martin
And can you run the nigthlies for the time being?
--
Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence
Hello Igor Vitorac, Devinder Singh
On 2012-10-31 09:24, Igor Vitorac wrote:
I think the mentioned config is not possible.
Pay attention that even if you have the same user details in 2 different
sources, they will behave like two different SOGo users.
That is definitely wrong.
As long as
Am 31.10.2012 14:20, schrieb Wolfgang Sourdeau:
On 2012-10-31 07:42CET, Martin Rabl wrote:
Affected, but can wait for 2.0.3
And can you run the nigthlies for the time being?
No, is a production system, but that doesn't matter.
We can wait (and smile :-) ), at our setup the bug comes up only
Sorry my mistake. I had in mind another scenario where user name
patterns for login into SOGo were different (e.g. user1@domain and user1).
Christian Mack wrote, On 31/10/2012 14:28:
On 2012-10-31 09:24, Igor Vitorac wrote:
I think the mentioned config is not possible.
Pay attention that
Thanks Christain for confirming this is possible.
My major agenda is to avoid unnecessary user setup on Samba who do not
wish to use MS Outlook. For them Mysql authentication can work.
Whereas the ones using the Microsoft Outlook can be by privilege setup
up on Samba.
However, Right now I
[sogo@sogo ~]$ defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN
Please try with plain (lowercase) instead.
--
Wolfgang Sourdeau :: +1 (514) 447-4918 ext. 125 :: wsourd...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. Leaders behind SOGo (sogo.nu) and PacketFence
Hi,
short question: I two companies do both have their own SOGo servers and on
person from company A invites a person from company B, the receiver gets mail.
If for example this person clicks on the mail attachment in Apple Mail, the
event is inserted. If I (spoken as person B) double click
Hello!
I'm just trying to find out how the SOGo Connector and the SOGo
Integrator work and how to get it connecting to the server. The docs
from http://www.sogo.nu/english/support/documentation.html are not very
helpfull. The section about the Connector is merely a feature list, but
far from
On 10/31/2012 10:11 AM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
[sogo@sogo ~]$ defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN
Please try with plain (lowercase) instead.
defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType plain
On 2012-10-31 13:38, Ron Yacketta wrote:
On 10/31/2012 10:11 AM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
[sogo@sogo ~]$ defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN
Please try with plain (lowercase) instead.
defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod
On 10/31/2012 1:39 PM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
On 2012-10-31 13:38, Ron Yacketta wrote:
On 10/31/2012 10:11 AM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
[sogo@sogo ~]$ defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN
Please try with plain (lowercase) instead.
defaults read sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType
sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType plain
sogo.log:
S: SMTP-Reply: code=220 line='smtp.potsdam.edu ESMTP'
C: EHLO sogo.potsdam.edu
S: SMTP-Reply: code=250 line='8BITMIME'
S: pipelining extension supported.
S: size extension supported.
C: QUIT
S:
Hello
I do an upgrade and sogo won't goes on.
in /usr/var/log/sogo/sogo.log it tell me:
012-10-31 18:11:03.041 sogod[2773] UIxComponent.m:74 Assertion failed in
UIxComponent(instance), method initialize. invalid superclass (SoComponent)
version 0 !
/usr/sbin/sogod: Uncaught exception
On 10/31/2012 2:04 PM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
Can you show mne the output of tcpflow port 25?
tcpflow -c port 25
tcpflow[28297]: listening on eth0
137.143.110.104.00025-137.143.110.044.47932: 220 smtp.potsdam.edu ESMTP
137.143.110.044.47932-137.143.110.104.00025: EHLO sogo.potsdam.edu
I also have a similar problem where the inbox is not visible for any
users after upgrading to 2.0.2.
The only error:
sogod[5278] parseTimeZone: cannot partse time notation 'GMT'
Connecting to local IMAP seems fine and nothing else was changed in the
upgrade I just apt-get upgraded
I am
On 10/31/2012 07:04 PM, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
Can you show mne the output of tcpflow port 25?
tcpflow -c port 25
tcpflow[28297]: listening on eth0
137.143.110.104.00025-137.143.110.044.47932: 220 smtp.potsdam.edu ESMTP
137.143.110.044.47932-137.143.110.104.00025: EHLO sogo.potsdam.edu
Title: BTS activities for Wednesday, October 31 2012
BTS Activities
Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
Project: SOGo
For the period covering: Wednesday, October 31 2012
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
32 matches
Mail list logo
