Hello,
I've noticed that during my vacation our (master-master) database
replication failed (for unrelated reasons), and now our SOGo databases
have diverged quite a bit between the servers.
The good news is that each user exclusively wrote to *one* server, and
both servers have used correct auto
Is there seriously no one here willing to just answer this very simple
question?
On 7/21/2014 8:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/21/2014 5:42 AM, Christian Mack
wrote:
> You can specify multiple SOGoUserSources and set canAuthenticate and
> isAddressBook for each according to your needs
I have a spamd process running on our Ubuntu based SOGo server, but I can't
find the place where the config files are located. I've edited local.cf in
/etc/spamassassin, but the changes didn't appear to do anything (added "*
SPAM **" to the subject, and turned on a few flags). I occasion
Well, I can tell you that the errors below are considered 'normal'.
Appearently we all have them, they have been reported on list, and they
are harmless.
For the rest I cannot help you, I'm sorry.
On 7/22/2014 13:21, Charles Marcus wrote:
could not convert value of userCertificate to string
On 7/22/2014 11:32 AM, heupink wrote:
Well, I can tell you that the errors below are considered 'normal'.
Apparently we all have them, they have been reported on list, and they
are harmless.
Even this one:
Jul 21 06:57:07 sogod [29455]: <0x0x7ff375997e80[LDAPSource]> NAME:LDAPException REAS
Oh, sorry, missed that you were just referring to the one about the
userCert...
and thanks for the reply, you're the only one so far, not sure why the
devs are ignoring me. Maybe my pleasant demeanor... ;)
I'm mostly concerned about the failed bind operation, and the fact that
there are lite
On 2014-07-21, 1:46 PM, Rodrigo Habib Gregori wrote:
> We wonder if SOGo can handle such a user base of this size (actually the base
> is going to increase: probably 12.000 mailboxes - at least - in 2 or 3 years).
Quite easily. At Inverse we support tons of environments with user bases
ranging from
On 2014-07-21, 8:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> My question is, could this problem simply be caused because the LDAP
> user Source has canAuthenticate set to yes?
Yes and it's required for groups, as stated in the documentation:
"/Finally, SOGo supports LDAP-based groups. Groups must be deļ¬ned li
On 7/22/2014 4:15 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 2014-07-21, 8:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
My question is, could this problem simply be caused because the LDAP
user Source has canAuthenticate set to yes?
Yes and it's required for groups, as stated in the documentation:
"Finally, SOGo suppo
Title: BTS activities for Tuesday, July 22 2014
BTS Activities
Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
Project: SOGo
For the period covering: Tuesday, July 22 2014
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
2571
10 matches
Mail list logo
