On 14/09/12 12:55, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
# we've moved lots of projects to github
(https://github.com/inverse-inc) - SOGo and SOPE are the only
remaining projects to be moved
This is now a thing of the past:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo
https://github.com/inverse-inc/sope
Enjoy!
--
Hello,
Looks like we'll have to push back the release of SOGo v2.0 for a few
days again. The main reasons behind this decision are:
1. we're still waiting for Microsoft for an issue regarding calendar
sharing and one regarding recurring events - progress has been made
nonetheless with th
Am 26.08.12 15:56, schrieb oo...@front.ru:
I have been already tried Dovecot for some time.
After some SOGo/Openchange changes it works togeter fine, at least with Dovecot
2.1.9.
I asked Dovecot developer and he has added THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT IMAP4
extension.
I think Dovecot has been fully ready
I have been already tried Dovecot for some time.
After some SOGo/Openchange changes it works togeter fine, at least with Dovecot
2.1.9.
I asked Dovecot developer and he has added THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT IMAP4
extension.
I think Dovecot has been fully ready to use with SOGo.
--
users@sogo.nu
https:/
Hi,
Am 26.08.12 00:18, schrieb Jeroen Dekkers:
At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200,
Are there problems with dovecot support for UIDPLUS or QRESYNC? I
can't find any documented issues.
UIDPLUS:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/FeatUIDPLUS
Timo Sirainen yesterday answered on my Question:
http://www.mail-
At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200,
Martin Rabl wrote:
> Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support QRESYNC
> and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer" of SOGo?
> We have to use Cyrus, because dovecot seems not to suppor that in a
> proper way (polite spok
On 25/08/12 14:43, Martin Rabl wrote:
Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support
QRESYNC and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer"
of SOGo?
Correct.
--
Ludovic Marcotte
+1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.n
Hi,
Am 25.08.12 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You
only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements
on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below.
Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Serve
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
so, will this be provided as well?
You most likely read that in
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
> On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
>> I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
>> I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
>> so, will this be provided as well?
> You most likely re
On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
so, will this be provided as well?
You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You
on
Am 24.08.2012 23:26, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
> On 24/08/12 17:20, Donny Brooks wrote:
>> Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to
>> configure it. But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that
>> was why everyone was doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to
On 24/08/12 17:20, Donny Brooks wrote:
Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to configure it.
But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that was why everyone was
doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to 2.0 once it is released? Would
it be available to do
On Friday, August 24, 2012 04:10 PM CDT, Ludovic Marcotte
wrote:
> On 24/08/12 17:09, Donny Brooks wrote:
> > What does that mean to those of us that don't need the outlook connection
> > or can't move to the samba4/AD setup? Basically meaning we have to stay
> > with the 1.3.X branch?
On 24/08/12 17:09, Donny Brooks wrote:
What does that mean to those of us that don't need the outlook connection or
can't move to the samba4/AD setup? Basically meaning we have to stay with the
1.3.X branch? Will this mean no more features being added and/or bug fixes?
The native Outlook connec
On Friday, August 24, 2012 03:07 PM CDT, Ludovic Marcotte
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been receiving quite a good amount of questions lately about this
> so let me clarify the upcoming releases/activities regarding SOGo.
>
> First, we'll release SOGo v1.3.18 early next week. This will b
16 matches
Mail list logo
