Thanks Jeff,
It is working now. I checked the web page you sent. Also, I
went
back and reinstalled the dns modules. I got prompted to install some
additional mods, which I did. Then, I rebooted and all is working now.
Thanks
Shane
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jeff C
Yup, I'm well aware that amavisd-new doesn't allow SA to change the
header. I am mostly looking to detect certain info in the header and
score from it.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 5:47 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.or
Sam Nilsson wrote:
SA still looks to its own config file (typically named local.cf) to run
and score all of its tests, it just doesn't get to rewrite the original
message.
More info here:
-- http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Sorry! More info here:
-- http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq
On Friday, December 31, 2004, 2:15:51 PM, shane mullins wrote:
> The Net::DNS module is ver 0.48.
>> Our secondary spam box is not performing dns tests. The perl mod dns
> is
>> installed and the dns_available option is set in the local.cf. Does
>> anyone have any suggestions?
There are some su
Jason Gauthier wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Due to my "newbie-ness" with these products I'm a
little uncertain were to start. Amavis seems to build many rules, and
interface with SA where it actually has options in it.
Read the docs at the amavisd-new site here:
-- http://www.ijs.si/software/amav
The Net::DNS module is ver 0.48.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 5:13 PM
Subject: DNS tests
> Our secondary spam box is not performing dns tests. The perl mod dns
is
> installed and the dns_available option is s
Our secondary spam box is not performing dns tests. The perl mod dns is
installed and the dns_available option is set in the local.cf. Does
anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
Shane
Great!
Using your example and the website I'm able to understand this much
better.
My idea is to start small and make sure it works.
So I simply added this:
header L_FROM Received =~ /server24/
score L_FROM -1.0
If the received line contains server24 then score it as -1.0. I know
this is easy
At 02:45 PM 12/31/2004, Jason Gauthier wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Due to my "newbie-ness" with these products I'm a
little uncertain were to start. Amavis seems to build many rules, and
interface with SA where it actually has options in it.
Would I build this rule within amavis or SA?
I'd do the
Thanks for the tip. Due to my "newbie-ness" with these products I'm a
little uncertain were to start. Amavis seems to build many rules, and
interface with SA where it actually has options in it.
Would I build this rule within amavis or SA?
And of course, could you (or someone) point me to some
> BTW, (slightly off topic), I also hate the way that clicking on a
> link within Outlook will take over an existing MS Explorer window
> when I'd rather it open a new window and not interfere. Is there
> a way to change the default behavior for this?
In IE:
Tools->internet options->advanced and u
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 12:22 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> So: How do you forward a message as an attachment from MS Outlook, and
> which version(s) of Outlook does that particular method work for?
>
> If the best possible with some version is "resending" or something like
> Pine's "bounce" capabil
> BTW, (slightly off topic), I also hate the way that clicking on a link
within Outlook will take over an existing MS Explorer window when I'd rather
it open a new window and not interfere. Is there a way to change the default
behavior for this?
In OE you can shift-click to get a new window, but t
> If the best possible with some version is "resending" or something like
Do not 'resend'. This will mash the headers.
The simplest method (but not necessarily for the user) is to have the user
create a new mail message, address it "to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (or whatever) and
then
drag the spam mes
> I just have users compose a new email and then drag the old mail from their
> Inbox into the new email and send it. This preserves the headers of the old
> email so I can drag the attached message out of their email and review it.
Great solution... but a pain to try to explain to novice and/or
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Deugau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 12:22 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Forwarding mail as an attachment from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED] Outlook
>
> I know I've seen a number of suggestions he
contact me if interested
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Which tool are you using to connect between exchange and spamassassin?
Thanks,
JamesDR
Eric C Sandquist wrote:
I have gotten SpamAssassin(Latest Release) to work with exchange using
one of the sinks.
It seems to be doing a wonderful job of catching spam..
BUT --- It is also damaging
I know I've seen a number of suggestions here and there for "How to
forward mail as an attachment from MS Outlook". I've searched through
the archives - more or less - and haven't quite found what I'm certain
I've seen.
So: How do you forward a message as an attachment from MS Outlook, and
which
At 09:10 AM 12/31/2004 -0500, Jason Gauthier wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if there is anyway I get incorporate sa-learn to
learn ham based on what my people send through the box. This is a relay
only server, which from my reading, kind of complicates things.
My end goal, if possible, is to
Title: Training SA with postfix
Hey all,
I've just spend a good amount of time installing postfix, amavis-new, clamAV and SA (with DCC, razor, pyzor) -- [All the "latest" versions]
I'm trying to figure out if there is anyway I get incorporate sa-learn to learn ham based on what my peopl
MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
Which is faster? Using the standard SA setup or using Mysql prefs and
databases?
Hi,
I have personally found that SA is much faster when using MySQL,
especially for bayes.
Regards,
Rick
Doesn't seem that SA itself should be able to do this, since it isn't
supposed to change the mail except to add the scores. I suppose it could be
a line-ending problem if you are running SA itself on Windows.
But I'd more think this is a problem with whatever tool you have used to
integrate SA wi
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 06:52:22PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What happens when we all go to IPv6? There seems to be some disagreement
> over how much reverse support will be deployed.
If IPv6 support was added, mkrdns (http://www.mkrdns.org/) would make the
reverse entries trivially managed.
--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:33 PM -0500 Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*grin*.. never underestimate the importance of having PTR records, or
hosts file entries, for all of your machines.
What happens when we all go to IPv6? There seems to be some disagreement
over how much revers
At 08:19 PM 12/30/2004, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Just a quick note to say, I *finally* got my SA working faster by
adding PTR records for the MySQL server.
*grin*.. never underestimate the importance of having PTR records, or hosts
file entries, for all of your machines.
A lot of services have suppo
--On Friday, December 31, 2004 1:19 AM + Nigel Frankcom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a quick note to say, I *finally* got my SA working faster by
adding PTR records for the MySQL server.
What was actually checking for the PTR records? Ie. what other MySQL
clients could benefit from this?
Hi all,
Just a quick note to say, I *finally* got my SA working faster by
adding PTR records for the MySQL server.
The speed difference is astounding, on FC3 the turnaround time on a
test mail has gone from 1 minute plus down to 1 - 2 seconds.
Standard mail is running so much faster that compari
At 09:53 AM 12/30/2004, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:36:00AM -0500, Josh Endries wrote:
> body and rawbody. This is with SA 2.63 and Perl 5.005_03, which I
> can't upgrade :(.
You do not have to upgrade perl, you can have a 2nd install instead.
And if Josh chooses to not upgrade
I have gotten SpamAssassin(Latest Release) to work with exchange using
one of the sinks.
It seems to be doing a wonderful job of catching spam..
BUT --- It is also damaging attachments, specifically PDFs… Any
ideas??? I seem to remember this happening a couple of years ago…
30 matches
Mail list logo
