On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 05:31, jdow wrote:
From: Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Saturday, August 13, 2005 6:58 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:07:14PM +0530, Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
When I build the rpm from the spec file ( on
sarge/perl5.8/i386/spamassassin 3.0.4
Hi list,
I'm training my bayesian base after a disk crash.
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --mbox /var/mail/spams --no-sync --spam
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --mbox /var/mail/spams --no-sync --ham
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --sync
and
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
---BeginMessage---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sarge/perl5.8/i386/spamassassin 3.0.4
Hi list,
I'm training my bayesian base after a disk crash.
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --mbox /var/mail/spams --no-sync --spam
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn --mbox /var/mail/spams --no-sync --ham
sudo /usr/bin/sa-learn
Hi Mouss
mouss wrote:
amavisd regenerates SA headers. you need to patch amavisd.
In amavisd (/usr/*/sbin/amavisd), look for X-Spam-Score and uncomment
the corresponding statement.
(you may want to do the same with the checker version header to enable
SA version header).
I forgot to mention
Hello,
In an attempt to always allow emails from particular domains, I have added
the following lines into /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] inmac.co.uk
def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inmac.co.uk
def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL
Well, that one failed and it wasn't the list-posted copy. That was my direct
email.
And the HELO *should* pass due to the inclusion of IP address.
It looks like you've got a broken trust path and SA is checking the wrong
Received: header.
Is your mailserver NATed?
Do you have
I still have something strange going on that I can't figure out.
When your mail came this morning, it did NOT have SPF_PASS, but if I
run things manually now, I get it.
Here is what I'm seeing when I run things manually now...
The HELO fails like this...
[5056] dbg: spf: checking HELO
For the last several days, all messages scanned have not been using bayes
because of an
error:
debug: bayes: tok_get: SQL Error: ERROR: unterminated quoted string at or near
' at
character 145
debug: bayes: _put_token: SQL Error: ERROR: unterminated quoted string at or
near '
at character
Andre Nicholson wrote:
This happens when scanning incoming messages and trying to sa-learn them
manually. The
errors cause no tokens to be available and thus bayes is ignored. Other than
reverting
to a backup of the database, is there something I can do or look at to fix
this? I've
never seen
Do not use 3.0 with PostgreSQL. It's known to have problems. Actually,
the problem you're seeing might be DBD::Pg related. Did you possibly
just install a new version? Make sure you are using the version listed
in sql/README.bayes.
I haven't noticed anything out of the ordinary after I made
Running spamd with --debug=spf I'm getting some clues
In the spamd log, I'm seeing...
Aug 16 09:16:37 xx spamassassin[6390]: spf: cannot get Envelope-
From, cannot use SPF
But, after I receive the email and run it through, it has no problem
finding Envelope-From.
Anyone know what may
That was it. I had for some reason has removed the R flag in the
postfix filter that was sending the mail to spamc.
That of course broke spf's ability to do lookups on Return-Path.
On Aug 16, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Steve Martin wrote:
Running spamd with --debug=spf I'm getting some clues
In
Can someone explain what is going on with this SPF check?
Aug 16 10:36:22 x spamassassin[6873]: spf: checking HELO
(helo=mail01.infostations.net, ip=69.19.135.50)
Aug 16 10:36:22 x spamassassin[6873]: spf: query for /
69.19.135.50/mail01.infostations.net: result: none, comment: SPF:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Martin writes:
Can someone explain what is going on with this SPF check?
Aug 16 10:36:22 x spamassassin[6873]: spf: checking HELO
(helo=mail01.infostations.net, ipi.19.135.50)
Aug 16 10:36:22 x spamassassin[6873]: spf: query for
I've got SA 3.04 running on a RH Linux 2.1AS server and it is running
properly Razor2 is installed; DCC and Pyzor are not, as they won't
compile). So far though, it's not doing a very good job of catching
spam; only a small percentage is getting marked.
In an effort to improve it's
Christopher Scott wrote:
snip
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8430ec8)
implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x8e687ec)
implements 'parse_config'
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 1
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
In an attempt to always allow emails from particular domains, I have added
the following lines into /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] inmac.co.uk
def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inmac.co.uk
On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Christopher Scott wrote:
snip
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH
(0x8430ec8) implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH
(0x8e687ec) implements 'parse_config'
config:
Search your drive for stray copies of local.cf. See if you ended up with an
etc/spamassassin directory or have a local.cf in your home directory.
RO
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:30
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Richard Ozer wrote:
Search your drive for stray copies of local.cf. See if you ended up with
an etc/spamassassin directory or have a local.cf in your home directory.
Or even better, as with anytime you have a question about what's going on with
SA,
You can access all the available versions from the distribution page. A
link to the distribution page can be found in the search results or in
the header of the module page and will look like:
http://search.cpan.org/~felicity/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4/
jdow wrote:
How does one search there
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*** THIS IS A RELEASE CANDIDATE ONLY, NOT THE FINAL 3.1.0 RELEASE ***
SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc1 is released! SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a major update.
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical and
heuristic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
I'm seeing this in my log files from time to time
Aug 16 17:07:13 spa001 spamassassin[29154]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm
in @INC
(@INC contains: ../lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
I'm seeing this in my log files from time to time
Aug 16 17:07:13 spa001 spamassassin[29154]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm
in @INC
(@INC contains: ../lib
I'm getting a lot of spams slipping thru the net lately. They hit
BAYES_99 and nothing else, usually, because they contain almost no
content other than a URL:
http://uk.geocities.com/Robt_Bright/?M0v=Make.your.day_enjoyable.without
URIDNSBL is apparently skipping that due to it being
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:20:16PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Justin from the next release of 3.1X, can you document some compile flags?
Also, is anyone using a perl 5.8.8per yet?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country!
Jon Drukman wrote:
I'm getting a lot of spams slipping thru the net lately. They hit
BAYES_99 and nothing else, usually, because they contain almost no
content other than a URL:
Have you tried: http://antispam.imp.ch/rules/asciispam.cf ?
Michele
This was discussed a week or 2 ago.
Here is what I am using per somebody's post
uri GEOCITIES /^http:\/\/uk\.geocities\.com\b/i
describe GEOCITIES GEOCITIES with uk.geocities.com
score GEOCITIES 3.1
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Jon Drukman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Macdougall writes:
Rick Macdougall writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
I'm seeing this in my log files from time to time
Aug 16 17:07:13 spa001 spamassassin[29154]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm
in @INC
(@INC contains: ../lib
what about adding geocities and the like to the list of domains for
which lookup uses 3 labels instead of 2?
This way, it would be possible to list domains like uk.geocities.com in
uribl/surbl. after all, the logic that applies to com.uk and friends
also applies to hosters.
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 03:47 pm, Jon Drukman wrote:
I'm getting a lot of spams slipping thru the net lately. They hit
BAYES_99 and nothing else, usually, because they contain almost no
content other than a URL:
http://uk.geocities.com/Robt_Bright/?M0v=Make.your.day_enjoyable.without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chr. v. Stuckrad writes:
Not yet, because it seems 'too variable' to be caught by
simple rules. (But who ever would 'click' on such nonsense?)
Isn't that the real mystery? Of course, we don't know if anyone actually
*does*...
- --j.
-BEGIN
mouss wrote:
what about adding geocities and the like to the list of domains for
which lookup uses 3 labels instead of 2?
This way, it would be possible to list domains like uk.geocities.com in
uribl/surbl. after all, the logic that applies to com.uk and friends
also applies to hosters.
The
Hello, spamassassiners.
Nowadays, many people discuss 'uk.geocities.com' redirecting spam.
I also received the many spams, too.
By the way, I found a problem of SpamAssassin's extracting IP string
function.
My SpamAssassin (3.0.4) failed to detect almost of all 'uk.geo' spam's
host IP and
Dear;
Thank you very much for the URLs.
I tried to install Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64 to my production environment.
And I tried to install Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 to my test environment.
Both are Raq4s.
I cannot upgrade the perl 5.005 on the production macines at this time.
Because many CGIs are
35 matches
Mail list logo
