I use Linux, slackware 10.1 to be more specific. I use it for two reasons.
1. Its stable, secure and probably the most like UNIX( but free ).
2. It acts as a mailbag and buffer for my internal exchange servers.
I have two companies setup in this configuration and haven't had any
problems. I ca
Whips and chains maybe?
{O.O}
- Original Message -
From: "JM Coursimault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
Explicit paths helped me.
# Sauvegardes Bacula #
:0
* ^Subject:.*Bacula:
AxperiaSARL/Admin/Bacula
==> $HOME/mail/AxperiaSARL/Admin/Bacula
My opintion is Fedora Core 5 running on Dual Core Athlon 64 bit OS. The
dual core athlons are screaming fast but you need a newer Linux kernel
to run on it.
> From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
>
> (hmmm... top-posting)
>
> In truth, nothing I've read in this thread has seemed inciteful; not
> inflamator
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
[snip]
Now, not to start a thing about real colors, but red ...
[snip]
I've heard that black is the new black (maybe the old one too).
--
Robert G. Werner (Network Systems Administrator)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
559.244.3734
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and beg
On Friday April 07 2006 4:57 pm, mouss wrote:
> Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> >> Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
> >>
> >> You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
> >> public; r
> Try adding this to your amavisd.conf:
> $sa_debug = 1;
> or
> $sa_debug = '1,all';
> I'm not sure of the difference there, but those should allow amavis to
> give you some information about how SA is running.
The '1' was a value of choice with SA 2.x, the 'all' is used by SA 3.x.
Luc
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
You forgot editors. No, wai
Remember that flames start as a small ember that finally blows up into
flame. :) I'm more or less just joking that this is a flame war. It's
not there yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:23 PM
> To: users@spamass
(hmmm... top-posting)
In truth, nothing I've read in this thread has seemed inciteful; not
inflamatory at all. I think we all understand the passion we hold for the
distros we use, but it appears we've been mature enough (ok, I'm sucking my
thumb right now, so I guess I'm out) to give the OP s
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
>
> You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
> public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
You forgot editors. No, wait, that is a relig
Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Kather [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:24 AM
Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 04/07/2006 01:11:44 PM:
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:58 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > That's normal. RDJ keeps an extra copy of all of the rules
in that
> > subdirectory. SpamAssassin should ignore them. You
need to leave the
> > rules in /usr/loc
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
> so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
> opinion on the subject and some will have none at all, linux is lin
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:58 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > That's normal. RDJ keeps an extra copy of all of the rules in that
> > subdirectory. SpamAssassin should ignore them. You need to leave
> > the rules in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin since that is where
> >
Attached is what I use, found it on a webpage about installing SA when I
was going through it. Customized slightly for my local usernames and ways
of doing things.
When spamd dies, all mail continues to come through, it just doesn't get
analyzed by SA until spamd gets restarted.
Here's my c
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:58 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> That's normal. RDJ keeps an extra copy of all of the rules in that
> subdirectory. SpamAssassin should ignore them. You need to leave the
> rules in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin since that is where SA will
> read them from.
>
So, I n
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Thanks, I am running Postfix 2.2.8 with amavisd-new 2.3.3. I took a
> > message in my inbox, viewed source and copied to a file on the server,
> > but when I run 'spamassassin -D testfile', it just sits there and
> > hangs. The messages ar
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> The real problem is when I run rulesdujour, I end up with duplicate
> cf, a copy of each rule being in both
> /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin as well as a RuleDuJour sub folder,
> so it twice. I nuke the rules in the SA folder, leaving the ones in
> RulesDuJour sub f
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Thanks, I am running Postfix 2.2.8 with amavisd-new 2.3.3. I took a
> > message in my inbox, viewed source and copied to a file on the server,
> > but when I run 'spamassassin -D testfile', it just sits there and
> > hangs. The messages ar
Hello Everyone,
I installed SA 3.1 last night from source. I followed the
qmailrocks.org guide (since I use qmail) which seemed pretty easy when
came to setting up SA. This setup uses qmail-queue to invoke SA and Clamav.
My problem is when I monitor the mail server I see SA dominating the cpu
@
Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 04/07/2006 11:33:25 AM:
[snip]
> Thanks, I am running Postfix 2.2.8 with amavisd-new
2.3.3. I took a
> message in my inbox, viewed source and copied to a file on the server,
> but when I run 'spamassassin -D testfile', it just sits there and
hangs.
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:31 -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
> > Running a single message through SA with the -D option would
> > probably show you where the delay is.
> >
> > Unless you've disabled the URIDNSBL plugin, I'd add RBL_TIMEOUT 5 to
> > your config as the RBL timo
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:31 -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
> Running a single message through SA with the -D option would probably
> show you where the delay is.
>
> Unless you've disabled the URIDNSBL plugin, I'd add RBL_TIMEOUT 5 to
> your config as the RBL timout value is used for other DNS-type loo
> I upgraded from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1 and my delays went from less than 20 to
> 900 to over 1000. Here is my rule sets used by rules du jour and my SA
> config (same as prior to upgrade). I don't see anything that
> needs to be
> changed, can someone suggest what I am doing wrong?
>
> [ "${TRUSTED_RULES
I upgraded from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1 and my delays went from less than 20 to
900 to over 1000. Here is my rule sets used by rules du jour and my SA
config (same as prior to upgrade). I don't see anything that needs to be
changed, can someone suggest what I am doing wrong?
[ "${TRUSTED_RULESETS}" ] || \
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:47:01 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
> > Ask List gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> > spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
> > s
> What is the best way to send spam candidates from Outlook and Outlook
> Express to spamassassin for learning?
I use an IMAP account, have the users drag their message into an IMAP
folder on the server, then use a script to pull the messages from the
IMAP folder and learn them.
Bret
Michael Monnerie wrote:
I just found this:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd
mfg zmi
I have already tried this script and it was very close to what I was
wanting, but it does not connect to spamd in any manner. It actually
uses the perl libraries to interact wit
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 7. April 2006 14:09 James Keating wrote:
Any other thoughts?
I just found this:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd
mfg zmi
I have already tried this script and it was very close to what I was
wanting, but it does not connect to
On Freitag, 7. April 2006 14:09 James Keating wrote:
> Any other thoughts?
I just found this:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ide
jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
Explicit paths helped me.
# Sauvegardes Bacula #
:0
* ^Subject:.*Bacula:
AxperiaSARL/Admin/Bacula
==> $HOME/mail/AxperiaSARL/Admin/Bacula
Well done, it works. Now the pb is that Ingo never generates the "$HOME/mail"
prefix. How can I tell Ingo t
Gary W. Smith wrote:
In master.cf we have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filter:
filterunix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq
user=filter argv=/etc/mail/spamassassin/filter.sh -f ${sender} --
${recipient}
filter.sh:
sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
> Looks like I have to enable SA in the 2nd server. It might be a spam
> hole if the spam sent to 2nd first, then forcily relayed to the primary.
>
>
Sorry for the late response, I'm just catching up on some backlog.
Here's
- Original Message -
From: "JM Coursimault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 00:59
Subject: Global vs per-user procmailrc filtering rules
Hello all,
I want to sort my incoming mail into various folders after it has been processed
by spamc/spamd. But my per-user
Hi, I received such a legitimate mail:
Received: from GTEW2KPR07 by marketing.grouppoint.at
(MDaemon.Standard.v7.2.2.R)
with ESMTP id pd5008044.msg
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:26:25 +0200
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "GROUP POINT News" <[EMAIL
> spamc -R < 2006.04.07/ham/33. -4.6/5.0
>
> Détails de l'analyse du message: (-4.6 points, 5.0 requis)
> 0.0 NO_REAL_NAME Le champ From: ne contient pas le nom complet
de l'e xpéditeur
> -3.3 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts
> -2.6 BAYES_00
hi !
i'v got this
spamc -R < 2006.04.07/ham/33. -4.6/5.0
-- Début de Rapport SpamAssassin -
Ce message est probablement du SPAM (message non sollicité envoyé en
masse, publicité, escroquerie...).
Cette notice a été ajoutée par le système d'analyse "SpamAssas
On Dienstag, 4. April 2006 09:23 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Hi, I got feedback today that they use "Mass Mailer" to send their
> e-mails. So it's really a forged OE Mail. I told them to use
> something else, otherwise they won't be able to contact a lot of
> customers...
I received another e-mail f
On Freitag, 7. April 2006 10:00 Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
> http://www.olspamcop.org/download.shtml.
It looks like something very useful. I'll give it a try. Thanks for the
hint.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531
I use Outlook 2003 and use a freeware Outlook toolbar called "Outlook Spam
Report Utility", available from http://www.olspamcop.org/download.shtml.
It's designed to enable the easy forwarding of spam to SpamCop, but can
easily be modified to forward spam or ham to your own mail server for
learn
Hello all,
I want to sort my incoming mail into various folders after it has been processed
by spamc/spamd. But my per-user .procmailrc does not seem to be taken into
account.
I'm on a Mandriva 2006. My packages are
spamassassin-3.0.4-3.2.20060mdk
spamassassin-spamc-3.0.4-3.2.20060mdk
spamassass
42 matches
Mail list logo
