On 5/23/2006 2:51 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WebRedirectPlugin
there is a slight config error on the page
[WWW] http://people.apache.org/~dos/sa-plugins/3.1/WebRedirect.cf
[WWW] http://people.apache.org/~dos/sa-plugins/3.1/WebRedirect.pm
in the cf file the
On Dienstag, 23. Mai 2006 00:50 Alan Fullmer wrote:
Mem: 8108656k total, 5907792k used, 2200864k free, 218704k
buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 0k used, 2031608k free,
2867736k cached
That doesn't show spamd is using memory. It's the overall system, and of
course it will use all
Indeed, as long as it says swap: 0k used I would say it is just good memory
management. :-)
-Sietse
From: Michael Monnerie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 23-May-06 9:34
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamd memory leak?
On Dienstag, 23.
There you have said it: A good spam filter. And I was talking about
Outlook.. :-)
From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 23-May-06 13:18
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Outlook 2003 Junk filter
But I am using spamc/spamd. I think that the ifspamh-script is a wrapper for
spamc. Inside the ifspamh-script gets spamc called.
I read already that spamc normally won't scan messages larger 256kb by
default. Thats my problem: It seems that spamc tries to scan the large
messages anyway. The
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 07:23 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
URI based black lists have been extremely effected in identifying spam.
I propose another kind of black list. A list of email addresses embedded
in the message body as replies to nigerian type spam and other spam
where you are instructed
Title: RE: Naming conventions for tests
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kreunen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 8:07 PM
To: SPAMAssassin email list
Subject: Naming conventions for tests
Hi All
I've been approaching the problem of filtering spam at the
Nathan Broderick wrote:
Where does the local.cf file first get read in by SpamAssassin?
Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' and you can see exactly when all the
config files are read in.
--
Bowie
Marc Perkel wrote:
So - if I wanted to set up my own RBL for others to query me, how
would I do that? I'm seriously thinking about it. Alternatively, I can
stream my spam to anyone else who is already doing it. I've modified
my spam stream to exclude stuff already listed in several other
I´d like to know if it´s possible to filter efficiently all
those emails
about Viagra and friends with a subject that always changes and has
different letters inserted between the letters of the drug
name. I guess you
know which ones I´m talking about (Re: test VhtAGGRA / CItAlLIS).
I have the following headers in my local.cfadd_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_add_header all Level _STARS(*)_add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_) on
Very true. However I started with 1 gig of ram, then 2, then 8.
Each time it gets up to using the swap space, regardless of how much I put
in there.
Thanks for the thoughts, I will let this one ride out a little longer to see
what happens.
-Original Message-
From: Sietse van Zanen
That's just what I was looking for. Thank you.
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 10:11 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Nathan Broderick wrote:
Where does the local.cf file first get read in by SpamAssassin?
Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' and you can see exactly when all the
config files are read in.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released?
From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with
one stone.
I was hoping to get it out this month, but I
Hello list, I'm trying to run amavislogsumm against my mail logs, and some of
the scores are listed with a +10 at the end, which breaks the script. For
example:
May 23 10:17:22 216.186.73.25 amavis[7301]: (07301-01-9) SPAM-TAG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Yes, score=6.13+10
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:04:11PM -0700, Aaron Grewell wrote:
May 23 10:17:22 216.186.73.25 amavis[7301]: (07301-01-9) SPAM-TAG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Yes, score=6.13+10
tagged_above=1 required=6.2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, BODY_OPT_OUT=1,
[...]
Is that a score SA is
Is that a score SA is generating, or do I need to redirect this to the
amavisd-new list?
That's an amavis log entry, so you'd have to ask them.
OK, will do. Thanks Theo.
-Aaron
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:04:11PM -0700, Aaron Grewell wrote:
May 23 10:17:22 216.186.73.25 amavis[7301]: (07301-01-9) SPAM-TAG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Yes, score=6.13+10
tagged_above=1 required=6.2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, BODY_OPT_OUT=1,
[...]
Is that a score SA is
Sorry this is off-topic.
From amavisd-new RELEASE_NOTES:
- in passed and quarantined mail a header field X-Spam-Status now shows
score as an explicit sum of SA score and a by-recipient score_sender
boost (when the boost is nonzero); the X-Spam-Score header field still
shows a sum of both
I've integrated spamassassin with postfix using spamd via the instructions:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
How do I test if I've done the integration correctly, how do I test out
spamassassin with postfix?
p.s.
Thanks!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:20:24PM -0700, Jana Nguyen wrote:
How do I test if I've done the integration correctly, how do I test out
spamassassin with postfix?
Take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TestingInstallation
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
`The best way to get a drink
John D. Hardin wrote:
Is somebody trying to phish Orkut user accounts?
Could be. It certainly looks suspicious.
...and if so, why??? :)
Maybe to take advantage of the fact that people often reuse passwords?
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net
Would it not be easier to create meta rules for the rules you
are looking for, then simply add more points for those? Thats
what most of us do. Otherwise you are prbly fighting a losing
battle trying to get a standard naming scheme. Its a great
idea, that simply won't get followed.
It
Razor is also a good check, but it only free for personal use
(same as dcc): http://razor.sourceforge.net
Razor compile and install is a bit more difficult than dcc or
pyzor, as it might need a whole lot of perl modules
(depending on what is already there), so better get your CPAN
right and
The data you showed, Alan, does NOT show the swap space being used.
Mem: 8108656k total, 5907792k used, 2200864k free, 218704k
buffers Swap: 2031608k total,0k used, 2031608k free,
^ ^^^
2867736k cached
So you are reading the report
And to me that sounds like me running a Small Business Server I
should be alrighht?
Yes, absolutely.
--Sandy
The main problem with this approach is that it requires monitoring
of the SPAM assassin tests being applied as the software is
updated...
Well, I'd say this is a problem chiefly because whoever _is_
administering the server -- not spamassassin.apache.org -- is clearly
not
On 5/23/2006 9:42 PM, Chan, Wilson wrote:
Anyone know of any good custom SA filters? Im already using SARE with
Rules dejour. Are there any other good custom filters online? Thanks!
Are you looking to catch a particular type of spam? Most people with an
up-to-date SpamAssassin version and a
Here is a complete header without the report_safe 1. Below the header is the
result of my MXLookup and NSLookup. You will notice that I put my score
down to 5 from my previous 8 in order to get this to report as spam.
My question is what do I have to do in order to stop SA from reporting that
And to me that sounds like me running a Small Business Server I
should be alrighht?
Yes, absolutely.
--Sandy
When I want to test that spam assassin it working it's fairly easy, look
in the header information or user the gtude command
http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/
But what
Event though hotmail.com domain has a abuse address and a postmaster
address, why do mails from hotmail.com domain get
trigerred for these tests
0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
Regards
Padma
ERNET Helpdesk
Are you looking to catch a particular type of spam? Most people with an
up-to-date SpamAssassin version and a complement of SARE rules are
either looking to catch something specific or are looking to fix a
mis-configuration.
Daryl
Im basically trying to build a better spam filtering box then
32 matches
Mail list logo
