On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 06:40 Chan, Wilson wrote:
Im basically trying to build a better spam filtering box then what
they have in the commerical side. With SARE, Sendmail SBL, my box is
doing pretty good, but spam is still getting through.
Use
* sa-update
* greylisting
and look at the SA
As long as you don't make money out of your spam filtering.
But I assume it would only cost you money to do so. :-)
-Sietse
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 24-May-06 3:23
To: Paul Matthews; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject:
We already reached that conclusion. ;-)
Anyway, if it is a memory leak, the swap should start to fill up sooner or
later.
Keep in mind thought, that it would be waste of memory, if your systems and
application use about 4GB , to leave the other 4GB doing nothing. Linux will
gradually fill it
Actually as I read the sequence of messages it went in a circle with Alan
asking the same question all over again in the message to which I replied.
If I mis-read it please forgive.
===8--- from below
Very true. However I started with 1 gig of ram, then 2, then 8.
Each time it gets up to using
On May 24, 2006, at 3:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Event though hotmail.com domain has a abuse address and a postmaster
address, why do mails from hotmail.com domain get
trigerred for these tests
0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
I believe the requirement is not just that the
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS=TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1
Can anyone
Paul Matthews wrote:
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS=TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0
According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
How do you deployed spamassassin?
I use a milter ...
Rich
From: Paul Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS=TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT
Because Hotmail is NOTmail.
Hotmail (Microsofties), does not reply to abuse and postmaster mails. That's is
against RFC, not nice, anti-social etc. etc.
Therefor hotmail, as the same with yahoo is SPAM by default. Some mail server
admins even block mail coming from there by default.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-u username
This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
per-user-config files, run spamc as the user whose config files spamd
should load. If youre running spamc as some other user, though, (eg.
root, mail, nobody, cyrus, etc.)
Hi all,
in my local.cf, I have (among others):
add_header all Contact Rainer Sokoll
If I pipe a mail through spamassassin, a header X-Spam-Contact: is
added, as expected. But spamd does not. spamd is called with these
options:
-d -u vscan --siteconfigpath=/usr/local/sendmail/etc/spamassassin -m
Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
How do you deployed spamassassin?
I use a milter ...
If you use open source milter (or closed source with right option) then
it should be possible to exclude some sending hosts (e.g. 127.0.0.1)
from some checks.
I think
Rich Winkel wrote:
According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
How do you deployed spamassassin?
I use a milter ...
If you're using spamass-milter, edit /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter and
add excluded addresses with the -i paramater:
EXTRA_FLAGS=-i 192.168.1.0/24,127.0.0.1
--
Steve
Paul Matthews wrote:
And to me that sounds like me running a Small Business
Server I should be alrighht?
Yes, absolutely.
--Sandy
When I want to test that spam assassin it working it's fairly easy,
look in the header information or user the gtude command
Or do some tcpdumping on ports UDP 6277 (DCC) and TCP 2703 (Razor2)
-Sietse
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 24-May-06 15:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re[2]: checksumming image spam
Paul Matthews wrote:
And to
Are you looking to catch a particular type of spam? Most people with an
up-to-date SpamAssassin version and a complement of SARE rules are
either looking to catch something specific or are looking to fix a
mis-configuration.
Daryl
Im basically trying to build a better spam filtering box then
Event though hotmail.com domain has a abuse address and a postmaster
address, why do mails from hotmail.com domain get
trigerred for these tests
0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
Because it's listed on both of those lists at rfc-ignorant.org:
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Rich Winkel wrote:
According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
How do you deployed spamassassin?
I use a milter ...
Rich
Specifically which milter?
Different milters have different features/options for that task.
I use miltrassassin which did not have that feature, so I
enhanced
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:50:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next
early month before it's all ready to go. ie: hopefully a week or two,
depending on how much time people have to create/review patches, etc.
Any
Is it a bad idea to --clear the Bayes database and start over from scratch.
I am not getting any false positives or having any other problems, but I almost
never --learn the database and if I do I never learn any ham.
I am getting ready to feed my bayes about 6000 of my most receint spam
Is it a bad idea to --clear the Bayes database and start
over from scratch. I am not getting any false positives or
having any other problems, but I almost never --learn the
database and if I do I never learn any ham.
I am getting ready to feed my bayes about 6000 of my most
receint spam
Hello,
I'm having problem sending email using spamd in postfix to send email
with a spam heading on it.
I ran some tests regarding to
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TestingInstallation
Running the first command test, I get:
spamassassin --lint command I get:
[2125] warn: config:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:05:36PM -0700, Jana Nguyen wrote:
Running the first command test, I get:
spamassassin --lint command I get:
[2125] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
use_razor2 0
[2125] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
use_dcc
The main problem with this approach is that it requires monitoring
of the SPAM assassin tests being applied as the software is
updated...
Well, I'd say this is a problem chiefly because whoever _is_
administering the server -- not spamassassin.apache.org -- is
Thnks for the info!
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Sietse van Zanen wrote:
Because Hotmail is NOTmail.
Hotmail (Microsofties), does not reply to abuse and postmaster mails. That's is
against RFC, not nice, anti-social etc. etc.
Therefor hotmail, as the same with yahoo is SPAM by default. Some
that info was indeed good!
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Mike Jackson wrote:
Event though hotmail.com domain has a abuse address and a postmaster
address, why do mails from hotmail.com domain get
trigerred for these tests
0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
Because it's listed on both
27 matches
Mail list logo
