You say the problem is 30 min to 2 hours. But you have been working on it
for how long and not fixed it?
You are probably over-simplifying the issue (maybe, maybe not). When you
quote a job you have to plan for worse case. Dealing with vendors, dns
issues, propagation issues, looking at the
On 6/2/2006 11:44 PM, spectacularstuff wrote:
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail. We would like to
hire someone that is familiar with SpamAssassin and a Windows 2003
server system in order to come set this thing up so that our own emails
are not being detected as SPAM. Is
I understand the issue of troubleshooting and repair.
How long I have worked on it is irrelavant as I have alreayd said, I don't
know what I am doing. If I did have the knowledge I would be able to fix it
and more than likely, quickly.
I personally work in computer repair, not in Server Setup
spectacularstuff wrote:
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail. We would like
to hire someone that is familiar with SpamAssassin and a Windows 2003
server system in order to come set this thing up so that our own
emails are not being detected as SPAM. Is anyone interested in
Hi Jo,
I thank youvery much for your advice and I wish I had the time to learn all of that but the fact of the matter is I am out in the field from 10am until around 1am,6-7 days a week. I don't have the time. I would love to learn all of that. It would be fantastic.
Wayne
---Original
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail.
Well, not really. I'd say part and parcel of any SA-MTA integration is
finding a way to whitelist messages _before SA is launched_, thus (a)
saving you SA's CPU and disk time (esp. since you're using
process-based spamassassin
Wow Thanks Sandy,
I have talked tothe SMtech support and have searched through their forum but they believe this is SA issue.
That makes a lot of sense. Yes, I am familiar with writing batch files. I am not a god at writing them but I can read and write them.
Yes we do use SMFilter but we
If SMFilter adds its own headers, couldn't you just write a custom rule for
SA that gives any message with those headers a negative score?
- Original Message -
From: WFGB Team
To: Sanford Whiteman
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 11:31 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi Stephanie,
You kind of lost me there. If all emails were going through SMFilter whether they were our emails or not, wouldn't all emails, including SPAM have those headers in them and therefore receive a negative score?
Thanks for the reply,
Wayne
---Original Message---
From:
I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
forum but they believe this is SA issue.
It is and it isn't. The fact that they don't have a simple way of
skipping their external test (and they have had many, many bugs over
the past few years relating to
If SMFilter adds its own headers, couldn't you just write a custom
rule for SA that gives any message with those headers a negative
score?
SMFilter doesn't add anything; SM does add an authenticated header.
But rather than plunge Wayne into SA rules -- which are still the
wrong
Thanks for setting that straight. I was confused on what we were searching for. I didn't realize I was searching the header. I thought I was searching the body of the document for spamming keywords.
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Sanford Whiteman
Date: 06/03/06 13:47:18
To:
Is there a blacklist of phone numbers?
A lot of diploma spam I get has totally different message bodies,
except they list the same phone number to call.
On Friday 02 June 2006 11:26 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris wrote:
This one got a -0.4 for me and I'm pretty sure its spam. You can d/l
the message here. Please let me know if you get anything different and
what rules were hit. Here is the link -
http://www.savefile.com/files/5914312
It
On Saturday 03 June 2006 12:13 am, jdow wrote:
By the way - that is the last time I retrieve something from savefiles.
If wget does not work - forget it.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 20:45
I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
forum but they believe this is SA issue.
P.S. You didn't start *a new thread* on their forum, which is as much
community-supported as vendor-supported. This is not being thorough,
for what seems like an urgent issue.
From: Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a blacklist of phone numbers?
A lot of diploma spam I get has totally different message bodies,
except they list the same phone number to call.
70_sare_evilnum*.cf
Visit http://www.rulesemporium.com/
{^_^}
Spam detection software, running on the system DEDE143, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
Contact Wayne for details.
Content
Spam detection software, running on the system DEDE143, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
Contact Wayne for details.
Content
I usually don't top quote, but folks, this is a troll..
And we all bit..
So troller, you have been sourced, go away..
WFGB Team wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system DEDE143, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this
Just a quick note that the 70_sare_html*.cf rules files have been
updated.
Information at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#html
Bob Menschel
21 matches
Mail list logo
