Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:52 PM -0700 kbaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It is visionary in that it is not the "norm", but again DBMail does
all of
this very well and has been production quality for quite some time.
I asked on the Dovecot list about how Dovecot comp
I am a new user. I am running on Windows 2003.
I have several domains on my servers.
I only want one domain on my server to use spam assassin. Where and what do i need to do to only filter for 1 domain on my sever. Is this possible.
I would also like to setup wrongmx on this as wel..
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Leverton wrote:
[snip]
> Subject: =3D?unicode-1-1-utf-7?Q?+kU1P4XK2YUuQGnfl- =20
> (+MKgw6TD8-)?=3D
>
Aside from the QP scatter, this subject doesn't look like it's properly
encoded. if memory serves, if the encoded subject needs to be
On Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:52 PM -0700 kbaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is visionary in that it is not the "norm", but again DBMail does all of
this very well and has been production quality for quite some time.
I asked on the Dovecot list about how Dovecot compares to DBMail and got
thi
> It might be working, but you don't have an identity (and you need one).
Do you need to register an identity just to perform queries? The razor
documentation implied you only needed to register if you wanted to
submit samples to the database...
--
John Hardin
That is likely true. I create on
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Gary V wrote:
> It might be working, but you don't have an identity (and you need one).
Do you need to register an identity just to perform queries? The razor
documentation implied you only needed to register if you wanted to
submit samples to the database...
--
John Hardin
[19041] dbg: razor2: razor2 is available, version 2.82
Well at least it is there for SpamAssassin to use.
[19041] dbg: razor2: results: spam? 0
Looks like the message was checked (and found not to be spam). Looks OK
provided the message was in fact not found in the razor database (that is
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:46:12PM -0400, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> I know there is an entry for this question on the wiki, but it wasn't
> helpful; maybe it is out of date?
The information has generally been constant for a while, but I wouldn't be
surprised if pieces were out of date. If you have a
If it doesn't say it's not working, it is working. The messages
indicate, that razor is called.
If you want to be sure, just check your spam mails, some of them should
contain a RAZOR tag. Or snoop the network for trafic to the razor
servers.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Murphy
> So - like I said - this is visionary stuff. Think SQL - think outside
> the box.
It's not all that visionary. Microsoft's been working on WinFS - a SQL
based system for storing files - for years. It's supposed to have been
released as a part of longhorn (vista), but they're pushing it back.
I'm
I need confirmation that razor is working with spamassassin. I'm using
the latest versions of Mail::SpamAssassin and razor2.
I know there is an entry for this question on the wiki, but it wasn't
helpful; maybe it is out of date?
When I run:
sudo -u amavis spamassassin -D --lint [19041] dbg:
Duane Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > IIRC, Um...520k of rules seems like an awful lot! Could be one
> > rule, could be several. Use the law of halfs. Take half the rules,
> > place them in, test. If it does bog the server down, cut that set
> > in half, test. Contin
Justin Cook wrote:
Oops.
I'm a bit of a novice user and I'm setting up SA under Postfix for the
first time.
Mail sent while SpamAssassin is running delivers fine, but anything
inbound (or mail sent to a local address from a local IP) fails with a
"max hops reached" error. It turns out Spa
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Craig McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duane Hill wrote:
[snippage]
I think what it boils down to is just getting carried away.
Thanks for the response. This is still relatively new with running our
MTA on FreeBSD. It was migrated away from Wind
Microsoft SMTPSVC seems to trigger BAD_ENC_HEADER when sending bounces if
it's been given a non-English bounce template (or whatever M$ use for
configuring that). Even bounces to correctly encoded mail. I've got quite
a number of examples, and all of them have a foreign language Subject
line,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duane Hill wrote:
[snippage]
> I think what it boils down to is just getting carried away.
>
> Thanks for the response. This is still relatively new with running our
> MTA on FreeBSD. It was migrated away from Windows about three weeks ago.
FWIW I ha
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:16 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Loading Rules - Possible Memory Issue
Don't know if someone can point me in a direction to look or
Title: RE: Loading Rules - Possible Memory Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Loading Rules - Possible Memory Issue
>
>
> Don't know if someone can point me
What does your spamd/current log show? If that's what you have.
Sounds like one of the rules is hosing spamd. I'm speaking from recent
experience.
Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:16 AM
To: users@spamassassin.
Has anyone any tips on doing this?
I do not want to mirror existing data (I already am :) )
I want to setup my own DNSBL to catch the junk that the other DNSBLS miss..
The only tutorials / guides I've found either refer explicitly to Bind or
make reference to rbldns-conf, which doesn't appear
Don't know if someone can point me in a direction to look or not. I'm
using SA through a third-party plugin for our MTA. This is running on
FreeBSD 6.0 with SA v3.1.1 on Perl v5.8.7.
As soon as I move aproximately 520K of rules into the directory with the
local.cf and restart the plugin, messa
>...
>Well - I'm a member of the Exim cult - but if something better comes
>along I might convert. :)
>
And you're not even British:) Actually I count Exim in the short
list of well done and readily usable/useful MTAs (i.e. works as expected,
not "can be made to work"). Still, I'm partia
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> Personally, I now prefer the headers being prepended over them being
> appended. There was about a week or two where I wasn't sure about
> it though.
I agree. I find that it helps to clarify exactly which server added
the headers. It also follows the same pattern
If I'm not mistaken, bayes_autolearn 1 should actually be
bayes_auto_learn 1
anyone please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. adieu
Scott
Loren Wilton wrote:
[11208] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
rewrite_header_subject *SPAM*
rewrite_header Subject SPAM
Oops.
I'm a bit of a novice user and I'm setting up SA under Postfix for the
first time.
Mail sent while SpamAssassin is running delivers fine, but anything
inbound (or mail sent to a local address from a local IP) fails with a
"max hops reached" error. It turns out Spamassassin is calling
po
> [11208] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
rewrite_header_subject *SPAM*
rewrite_header Subject SPAM
> [11208] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: bayes_autolearn 1
probably is bayes_autolearn Yes
> [11208] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: bay
Have you loaded all of the respected plugins in init.pre?
If so, run spamassassin -D --lint and post output here. It'ss give you the
reasons for not being able to parse the config lines.
-Sietse
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 14-J
Hi there,
i have a big problem with my spamassassin.
I have checked everything, and for me everything
is ok.
May someone can take a look, but at first some system
informations:
OS: Debian Linux 3.1 sarge
SA: Spamassassin 3.10
Additional Programms:
Maia Mailguard
mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.24
28 matches
Mail list logo
