Hi Loren,
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
For the main rules files you basically can't do this. It would theoreticaly
be possible, but it would take someone a lot of work to figure out what could
be done and then do it. It is far easier to update the whole package, which
will insur
Hi Michel,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
Hi, Ray. I'm a Debian admin as well. However, my experience has
been that for Spamassassin in particular, don't use the .deb package.
Instead, run the CPAN install process; I have it set as a CRON job that
fires monthly. You'll f
Hi Gary and others,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Gary V wrote:
read this, it may validate your choice to stay stable:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/kernel.html
No, I'll definitely stay with stable. I have dabbled with testing
for a bit and it was "fun" learning about Debian and breaking it an
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, David Cary Hart wrote:
> If someone can figure out the mechanics, I have a volunteer
> (working on her MBA) who is great at crafting policy. I also have
> the mirrors and structure. I am willing to add the zone. My first
> listing would be Gandi.
I have beta versions of this
Hello,
I'm trying to setup Spamassassin to use mysql for bayes storage. However I'm
experiencing problems with DBI complaining about "Transactions not supported
by database at /usr/lib/perl5/DBI.pm line 670."
I know that this is not strictly a spamassassin issue, but maybe someone from
this li
Hi Gary and others,
Thanks for the instructions; I will give that a try. My upgrade with
backports.org went successful and I did it before reading Michel's message
about using CPAN to install SA. It's catching 25% of the spam now, instead
of 0%...I've seen a few messages about boosting its
Hi people,
I have do use an old Version of Spamassassin (2.55) with a new version
of Confixx (which should not realy be the problem...)
However, the database is set, data is within the database, but no user
prefs are used!!
Where is the configuration error?
I'm runnig a SuSE 9.1 System
Spamd is
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:37:36PM +0200, H. Etzel wrote:
> I have do use an old Version of Spamassassin (2.55) with a new version
> of Confixx (which should not realy be the problem...)
> However, the database is set, data is within the database, but no user
> prefs are used!!
> Where is the confi
We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
have never experienced before.
We have recipient verification on our edge servers, so basically it's
all just bouncing off us, but it has been impacting us as we've already
had to up the maximum number of simultaneous SMTP conn
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:19AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
> have never experienced before.
>
> We have recipient verification on our edge servers, so basically it's
> all just bouncing off us, but it has been impacting us a
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:19AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
> have never experienced before.
Yeah. I had >260k "user unknown" entries per day last week (that's
over 3 per second for a whole day straight). The weekends are a
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:19AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
>
>> We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
>> have never experienced before.
>>
>
> Yeah. I had >260k "user unknown" entries per day last week (that's
> over 3 per second f
The Doctor wrote:
>
> I may have a server side solution using spamikaze but first
> what is the SMTP server software taht you are using?
>
We're using Qmail with assorted patches - like the recipient checking
one. I think the only solution that would improve our situation would be
getting these (
On Sun, August 20, 2006 22:35, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:37:36PM +0200, H. Etzel wrote:
>> I have do use an old Version of Spamassassin (2.55) with a new version
>> of Confixx (which should not realy be the problem...)
>> However, the database is set, data is within the d
On Sun, August 20, 2006 20:21, Dimitar G. Katerinski wrote:
> I'm trying to setup Spamassassin to use mysql for bayes storage. However I'm
> experiencing problems with DBI complaining about "Transactions not supported
> by database at /usr/lib/perl5/DBI.pm line 670."
yep see bug
http://bugs.gen
From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:19AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
We are getting HAMMERED with a dictionary attack that is on a scale we
have never experienced before.
Yeah. I had >260k "user unknown" entries per day last week
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:49:54AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > I may have a server side solution using spamikaze but first
> > what is the SMTP server software taht you are using?
> >
> We're using Qmail with assorted patches - like the recipient checking
> one. I think t
Greetings,
I am using fetchmail 6.3.4 and sendmail 8.13.6 on MacOS X 10.3.9 to
download and deliver mail, and spamd/spamc 3.1.3 run from procmail.
Under a heavy load (typically when we download a whole weekend's worth
of spam first thing Monday morning) most mail is not passed through to
spamc by
Does SA support DCC anymore? The directives
I used a few versions back do not work anymore.
THanks,
LDB
> On Sun, August 20, 2006 20:21, Dimitar G. Katerinski wrote:
> > I'm trying to setup Spamassassin to use mysql for bayes storage. However
> > I'm experiencing problems with DBI complaining about "Transactions not
> > supported by database at /usr/lib/perl5/DBI.pm line 670."
>
> yep see bug
> http:
On Mon, August 21, 2006 02:54, LDB wrote:
> Does SA support DCC anymore? The directives
> I used a few versions back do not work anymore.
yes, enable the plugin, if its still not, ask again where you provide more
info on with version of dcc and sa you are running
i only guesing here, you have a
jdow wrote:
>
>> We're getting around 60/sec for over 24 hours now :-(
>>
>> It ain't getting in, but the logs are filling my disk ;-)
>
> 5 MILLION a day! Who hates Trimble Navigation THAT much? (IMAO they're
> fairly good guys. I used to do GPS related work - satellite and ground.)
I guess that's
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, August 21, 2006 02:54, LDB wrote:
Does SA support DCC anymore? The directives
I used a few versions back do not work anymore.
yes, enable the plugin, if its still not, ask again where you provide more
info on with version of dcc and sa you are running
i only gu
On 8/20/2006 8:37 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We're getting around 60/sec for over 24 hours now :-(
It ain't getting in, but the logs are filling my disk ;-)
5 MILLION a day! Who hates Trimble Navigation THAT much? (IMAO they're
fairly good guys. I used to do GPS
Yeah, I've been getting hammered by these too. I've configured
Postfix to do HELO checks and the vast majority (95%) are failing at
the MTA.
--
Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios
21 Chesham Drive
Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
T: 416-247-7740
F: 416-247-7503
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptogra
On one of my machines, my logs are getting a fair amount of the following
message: Any clue would be welcome.
Aug 20 21:55:26 norcomix spamd[12046]: Can't locate object method "type" via
package "Net::DNS::RR::MX"
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 212.
Aug 20 21:5
26 matches
Mail list logo
