RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread Balzi Andrea
Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea

Re: Earthlink emails

2006-09-30 Thread Ramprasad
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:20 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote: Ramprasad wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 08:12 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote: Ramprasad wrote: Why not SPF ?? Over two thirds of the email I receive that is UCE/Spam has an SPF_PASS associated with it from SA. All SPF

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Balzi Andrea wrote: Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea You're distinctly NOT welcome. I don't help folks who outright blacklist whole ISP's with millions of legitimate users in order to prevent a portion of spam. Particularly when that ISP is one I'm using. Perhaps now

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread jdow
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Balzi Andrea wrote: -Original Message- [...] every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? That is a

Re: Non-blocklisted embedded URLs are getting hits on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL in SpamAssassin 3.1.5

2006-09-30 Thread Justin Mason
David Ulevitch writes: From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Date: Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:59:03 PM Subject: Non-blocklisted embedded URLs are getting hits on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL in SpamAssassin 3.1.5 ===8==Original message

Re: Non-blocklisted embedded URLs are getting hits on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL in SpamAssassin 3.1.5

2006-09-30 Thread David Ulevitch
On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:30 AM, Justin Mason wrote: David Ulevitch writes: Donald, We handle DNSBLs but not URIBLs, at the moment. Passing along to Noah to see what he can do. Sorry you had this happen to your SpamAssassin scoring. (Time to check mine... :-) ) You can resolve this behavior

Re: SA gone mad, times out and stucks

2006-09-30 Thread Jürgen Herz
Jürgen Herz wrote: Bowie Bailey wrote: If your --force-expire only took 19 seconds, I would guess that you are not talking to the same database. Make sure you are logged in as the same user that is having the problem when you run the --force-expire. Uh, that's a very good point. You can

Re: SA gone mad, times out and stucks

2006-09-30 Thread Andreas Pettersson
Jürgen Herz wrote: What I still get and not understand is warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/exim4/.spamassa ssin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Make sure the file permissions hasn't changed when you ran the manual expire. Regards, Andreas

Re: TQMcube Geo Zone config files

2006-09-30 Thread Andreas Pettersson
Andreas Pettersson wrote: In case anybody is interrested, I've compiled a config file for the geo zone at TQM http://tqmcube.com/worldzone.php It might not be of great use, but it is interresting to gather some statistics of where the mails come from. Files found here

SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Russ B.
I have a unique but interesting problem: I have a farm of servers that use Sendmail/ProcMail/SpamAssassin. Due to their very heavy loads and my custom rules, I have built a dual-proc-dual-core FBSD AMD64 bit OS server to do nothing but my major spam knockdowns and processing to send back to the

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Russ B.
Fix to above post's last lines: MX server scores it as spam score 200 -- MX server just nukes it MX server scores it as spam score 16 - MX tags it as spam -- sendmail farm just files it in the user's \Caught-Spam folder. MX server scores it as score 7, which is below questionable which is set

Re: Setting up DKIM and DomainKeys mail signing and verification

2006-09-30 Thread SM
At 12:32 28-09-2006, Henrik Ostergaard wrote: This sounds promissing! But I have distributed, moving users and therefore uses pop-before-smtp for authentication, which means that my IP list is in a hash table, which is not in CIDR format. :-( dk-filter and dkim-filter support pop-before-smtp.

Re: sa-learn and Caught spams

2006-09-30 Thread Bill Horne
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 21:00 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: Bill Horne wrote: I have a follow on question, so I'll add it to this thread: Assuming that it's a good idea to feed Caught spams through sa-learn in order to reinforce the tokens that might not have been autolearned, how do I

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Jerry Bell
I'm not the authority on such things, but I don't believe it's possible without some customization. I really wanted to ask you, though, how you handle mail rejection on the inner layer of mail servers? If mail gets through your front end SA box and needs to be rejected because it's to an invalid

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of September 30, 2006 12:32:41 PM -0500, Russ B. is alleged to have said: Basically, anything that arrives over 15 in score, will have that SPAM-STATUS header embedded, so it does NOT run SpamAssassin on this server, and just puts it in the Caught-Spam. If it has LOWER than a score of 15

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread jdow
From: Daniel Staal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --As of September 30, 2006 12:32:41 PM -0500, Russ B. is alleged to have said: Basically, anything that arrives over 15 in score, will have that SPAM-STATUS header embedded, so it does NOT run SpamAssassin on this server, and just puts it in the