On Friday, January 12, 2007, 6:10:32 PM, Michael Cocke wrote:
I was told a while back that the best way to extract urls from emails
was to use code from SpamAssassin. Ok - Now, I need to do just that.
Any pointers? I've looked thru the code in SpamCopURI, but unless there
are some docs
Hi,
I recently received this ad (1 million opt-in addresses of german companies)
I believe them that they collect information from a lot of sources (phone
books, public
registers, etc) but I doubt the victims on their list were given a chance to
opt in.
Maybe someone is interested to download
I was thinking that they are making use of what google has been
successful for, crawling bots that
_crawls_ web sites for targeted data for retrieval like email address as
for their case, but this time
on a much different objective compared to google.
Secondly, right after using zen.spamhaus,
Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as you are
describing here.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Staal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:05 PM
To:
On Fri, January 12, 2007 02:14, Matt Kettler wrote:
form of expiry is one reason why I say the AWL isn't really ready for
production use on any servers that have decent mail volume)
if one entry is just deleted when will there be records with 2 ?
awl is tricky but good, we have to live with
On Fri, January 12, 2007 03:35, Christopher Jett wrote:
OK - thanks. So, for example, it's safe to delete the bayes_seen
file after it gets over a certain size? Is there a particular size
after which performance degrades significantly?
i remember that file based bayes is huge, where sql
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, January 12, 2007 02:14, Matt Kettler wrote:
form of expiry is one reason why I say the AWL isn't really ready for
production use on any servers that have decent mail volume)
if one entry is just deleted when will there be records with 2 ?
I don't
--As of January 13, 2007 7:17:46 AM -0500, Dave Koontz is alleged to have
said:
Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as you are
describing here.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
I fixed a couple
Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of January 13, 2007 7:17:46 AM -0500, Dave Koontz is alleged to
have said:
Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as
you are
describing here.
--As for the rest, it is
Michael W. Cocke wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedI was
told a while back that the best way to extract urls from emails was to
use code from SpamAssassin. Ok - Now, I need to do just that. Any
pointers? I've looked thru the code in SpamCopURI, but unless there
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, January 12, 2007 02:14, Matt Kettler wrote:
form of expiry is one reason why I say the AWL isn't really ready for
production use on any servers that have decent mail volume)
if one entry is just deleted when will there be records with 2 ?
I don't understand
I *think* you're in agreement with what I just said. Using last-accessed
time instead of hit-count makes substantially more sense.
By moving AWL to SQL this can be accomplished. Here is a sample for MySQL:
Add a new field:
ALTER TABLE awl ADD lastupdate timestamp(14) NOT NULL;
If you have a
Greetings
Seeking some list wisdom please?
We have some well functioning boxes running SA out there
Most run RHEL 4 or CentOS 4
I am wondering where to go to find out specifically for each perl module if
we have the latest greatest and most stable version(s) etc
Please note the sa-update
I don't see why this method could not also be used for bayes_seen.
I was not aware bayes_seen would grow forever so I am going to implement
this
on my own system next week.
ALTER TABLE bayes_seen ADD lastupdate timestamp(14) NOT NULL;
Then wait a few weeks before implementing:
DELETE FROM
I'm running 3.1.7 under Gentoo. It seems like I might want to install
or enable Net::Ident, but I can't find anything about it in the
configuration files, though it shows up in debugging output as
dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed)
Then I installed Net-Ident and
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 02:40:54PM -0500, Andy Figueroa wrote:
What else do I need to do? I don't seem to be able to find a clue on my
own.
It's only used in spamd, so man spamd for more information.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
There's nothing wrong with [Microsoft] systems until Back
Thank you for the reply. I certainly agree that Net::Ident is mentioned
in the man for spamd. But, it doesn't help me enough. It did raise
these questions:
Is the spamd option --auth-ident the only thing Net::Ident is used for?
What is identd (I haven't found one on my system)?
Will
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:28:07PM -0500, Andy Figueroa wrote:
Is the spamd option --auth-ident the only thing Net::Ident is used for?
Yes.
What is identd (I haven't found one on my system)?
The idea is that a remote machine can ask who (user) is connecting to it.
In this case, spamd can
At this time I'm forwarding mail that SA considers spam to my gmail
account. The following bounces with
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.185.27]:
552 5.7.0 Illegal Attachment g5si5192165wra
error
None of the rules
Hi,
I'm interested in filtering mail relayed from hosts which have no reverse
dns (PTR) record. A lot of MTAs support rejection of mail from such hosts,
but I feel this will reject too much genuine mail, so I'm looking to
approach the problem via Spam Assassin - perhaps score 1 or 2 for such
Peter Smith wrote:
I'm interested in filtering mail relayed from hosts which have no reverse
dns (PTR) record. A lot of MTAs support rejection of mail from such hosts,
but I feel this will reject too much genuine mail, so I'm looking to
approach the problem via Spam Assassin - perhaps score 1
On Saturday 13 January 2007 09:01, R Lists06 wrote:
Also, please note the modules that are not active or found in the install
below during the SA update
Would installing them just be plug and play and they start working or do I
search them out individually too and their activation configs
Robert Nicholson wrote:
At this time I'm forwarding mail that SA considers spam to my gmail
account. The following bounces with
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.185.27]:
552 5.7.0 Illegal Attachment g5si5192165wra
Matt Kettler wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
At this time I'm forwarding mail that SA considers spam to my gmail
account. The following bounces with
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.185.27]:
552 5.7.0 Illegal Attachment
So how did you install in the first place?
Yes, installing these would cause them to start working.
I recommend installing using CPAN, as it is portable, reliable,
picks up its pre-requsites very well and you are not dependent
on some Distro specific packager.
If you have the latest
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
At this time I'm forwarding mail that SA considers spam to my gmail
account. The following bounces with
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 13, 2007, at 8:01 PM, R Lists06 wrote:
It is my experience that CPAN installs can or will tend to do
things I do
not want it to do (or cannot control) in a RPM environment among other
things...
Heh, my experience is just opposite,
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:58:55PM -0600, David Morton wrote:
It is my experience that CPAN installs can or will tend to do
things I do not want it to do (or cannot control) in a RPM environment
among other things...
Heh, my experience is just opposite, RPM environment often
None of the rules indicate that it had any exe or zip attachment
Why would they?
SA is a spam filter, not a virus filter.
You could try MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info)
Or this if you already have a procmail infrastructure:
29 matches
Mail list logo
