That's a nice one :) but looks like a sophisticated prog...
max_grabnew_if_bad = 250
debug_unk_user = false
num_dns_tries = 6
slow_start_count = 8000
user_agent_in_alt_position = true
debug_to_console = false
#use_helo_isphost = true
proxy_account_per_email = false
filter_hosts = true
#defer_fi
Yes - I googled it and found a lot of messages pointing to some patches
- and they didn't wotk. What do I really have to do to get rid of this
error?
pyzor: check failed: internal error
Thanks in advance
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
http://www.forbes.com/security/2007/06/20/stock-spam-internet-tech-security-cx_ag_0620spam.html
Got like 7 of them, all look pretty much like this:
X-Spam-Report:
* 5.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 0.9998]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi @ll,
here is some more info
http://www.forbes.com/security/2007/06/20/stock-spam-internet-tech-security-cx_ag_0620spam.html
- --
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Best Regards
Robert Schetterer
https://www.schetterer.org
Germany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
>
> This is a personal mail server, so I know exactly who sends mail on
> it, and "we" don't have a spam problem (unless you mean all the spam
> we're fighting to keep out). Of course, since it's a dynamic address,
> I can't be certain that other users of this address haven't sent spam,
> but a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yet Another Ninja schrieb:
> Nice one Spammy!
>
> Yihaaa!
>
> Stock spams with PDF attachments (118Kb) so be prepared.
>
> (nice the traits)
>
jep youre right , just the one arrives here
are there plans/rules to mark it ?
- --
Mit freundl
digitalsushi wrote:
I've changed my sendmail configuration to be more verbose about the
authentication information.
To add to this, I've discovered that it can match any token in the Received:
line that does NOT include an equals sign in it:
spamass-milter probably isn't checking the macros fo
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Hamie wrote:
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 18:09, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Hamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Small problem with SA 3.2.1... I'm using a mysql database. The DB
works
fine for amavisd-new, and SA AWL. e.g.
[438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connec
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 18:09, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > From: Hamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Small problem with SA 3.2.1... I'm using a mysql database. The DB
>
> works
>
> > fine for amavisd-new, and SA AWL. e.g.
> >
> > [438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connected to
> > DBI
I have been getting this error for some time now and have been trying to
find the root cause of it.
spamd[2681]: ldap: failed to load user scores from LDAP server, ignored
(Can't locate object method "schema" via package "URI::ldap" at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/LDAP.pm line 133, li
> From: Hamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Small problem with SA 3.2.1... I'm using a mysql database. The DB
works
> fine for amavisd-new, and SA AWL. e.g.
>
> [438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connected to
> DBI:mysql:sadb:ixx:
> [438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based using username:
Small problem with SA 3.2.1... I'm using a mysql database. The DB works fine
for amavisd-new, and SA AWL. e.g.
[438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connected to DBI:mysql:sadb:ixx:
[438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based using username: vscan01
[438288] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based get_
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, digitalsushi wrote:
> header LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD2ALL =~ /(authenticated bits=0)/
That's vulnerable to forgery.
If you're checking Received headers this way to whitelist, you
*really* want to include your local hostname and/or IP information in
the RE. That will make it
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, digitalsushi wrote:
> header BLAH Received =~ /blah/
> score BLAH -800.0
>
> And it's not picking it up. So I really have no idea what the
> pattern is.
N.B.: if you're using a plugin/milter to have the MTA pass messages to
SA during the SMTP phase (i.e. before the
One last update and I'll shut up for a bit.
I've updated my server to make my Received headers look literally like this:
Received: from [132.177.124.246] (doombox.iol.unh.edu [132.177.124.246])
(user=mikecrelay mech=PLAIN bits=0)
blah
by postal.iol.unh.edu (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP
I've changed my sendmail configuration to be more verbose about the
authentication information.
To add to this, I've discovered that it can match any token in the Received:
line that does NOT include an equals sign in it:
Received: from [132.177.124.246] (doombox.iol.unh.edu [132.177.124.246])
Nice one Spammy!
Yihaaa!
Stock spams with PDF attachments (118Kb) so be prepared.
(nice the traits)
Some weeks ago I put a message but no one answer it. Two days ago I install
Spamassassin 3.2.1 to see if the problem were corrected and it continues.
Anybody have the same problem or have a solution?
--
Hi,
Since today I'm using Spamsassasin 3.1.8 in a machine with two mysql
serve
> > How is the correct way to deactive AWL?
> >
>
> found in my amavisd.conf:
>
> $sa_auto_whitelist = 0; # turn on AWL in SA 2.63 or older
(irrelevant
> # for SA 3.0, cf option is
> 'use_auto_whitelist')
>
Yes, I know it. I think is the same than
Greetings and salutations,
We use sendmail, spamassassin, and the spamass-milter at our site. If a
user authenticates, we give them -100 spam points. After a somewhat recent
update, we discovered our rule is not matched any longer. The details:
Using
$ spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin vers
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I have a problem deactivating autowhitelist in my postfix + amavis +
> spamassassin servers. We have servers running postfix (2.3.8-2) and
> spamassassin (3.1.7-2) through amavisd-new (2.4.2-6) in a debian etch
> (4.0) operating system.
>
>The problem is t
My apologies - saw the same issue appended to the announce email for 3.2
The fix was to run a manual build -
...
As non-root user:
perl Makefile.PL
make
make test
As root:
make install
...
And it compiled successfully.
-Peter
On 20/06/07, Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed,
We have a patch in development which fixes some platform-specific perl
setuid brokenness, but it needs testing on those 3 platforms with spamd.
The patch is at:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5518#c18
and applies to SpamAssassin 3.2.1.
It should be possible to start a spam
El mié, 20-06-2007 a las 12:06 +0200, Uwe Kiewel escribió:
> Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > How is the correct way to deactive AWL?
> >
>
> found in my amavisd.conf:
>
> $sa_auto_whitelist = 0; # turn on AWL in SA 2.63 or older (irrelevant
>
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem deactivating autowhitelist in my postfix + amavis +
> spamassassin servers. We have servers running postfix (2.3.8-2) and
> spamassassin (3.1.7-2) through amavisd-new (2.4.2-6) in a debian etch
> (4.0) operating system.
>
> The problem
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:04 +0100, Peter Farrell wrote:
> Having problems re-installing SA.
> Blew away my previous installation cat'ing the .packlist to xargs rm.
> As root, start perl -MCPAN -e shell and 'install SpamAssassin'
> All of the errors in t/logs/* relate to either one of three things:
Having problems re-installing SA.
Blew away my previous installation cat'ing the .packlist to xargs rm.
As root, start perl -MCPAN -e shell and 'install SpamAssassin'
All of the errors in t/logs/* relate to either one of three things:
# cannot run
1. error: spamd: cannot run as nonexistent user o
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
[...]
>
> How is the correct way to deactive AWL?
>
found in my amavisd.conf:
$sa_auto_whitelist = 0; # turn on AWL in SA 2.63 or older (irrelevant
# for SA 3.0, cf option is
'use_auto_whitelist')
HTH,
Uwe
Hello,
I have a problem deactivating autowhitelist in my postfix + amavis +
spamassassin servers. We have servers running postfix (2.3.8-2) and
spamassassin (3.1.7-2) through amavisd-new (2.4.2-6) in a debian etch
(4.0) operating system.
The problem is that we want to deactivate A
> fc4, sendmail, sa 3.0.6, spamass-milter
>
> some clients get mail rejected from my server (which they are using to
> send) because sa is checking all mail. I use smtp auth - Is there any
> way to bypass SA if they have been authenticated?
Check this howto: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/b
30 matches
Mail list logo
