Re: Have Spamassassin forward mail to Spam Folder

Yes if you are silly enough. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Skip Brott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> These are more appropriately procmail questions, but Do you know if this ruleset will process before or after attempted delivery to the user (and thus triggering the .forward file)? Is th

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

It seems the data was cached. Let's see if it is correct after 24 hours later. Rick Macdougall wrote: Marc Perkel wrote: Getting a ton of false positives today on spamhaus. Generally they never get it wrong. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? I see it on one of my servers trying to

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

Dan Barker wrote: > That's not "Consumer Friendly", that's just WRONG! > > Glad you found it. > ...well If you were doing "RBL-style" lookups, don't they exclusively return 127.* addresses on matches - i.e. "no such host" or "address 204.4.4.4" should both be treated as "no such host" as far as

RE: False Positives on Spamhaus?

That's not "Consumer Friendly", that's just WRONG! Glad you found it. Dan The caching DNS servers we not accessable to the email serrves so they had no DNS. I decided to point the /etc/resolv.conf file to opendns.org's DNS servers and it does some tricky things and what it returned caching

Re: BAYES_99 and ham

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:25:30PM +0200, martin f. krafft wrote: > also sprach Joe Zitnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.26.1340 +0200]: > >Bump your BAYES_99 score. > > What is the basis for determining the BAYES_* scores? There's If you mean the rule scores: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassass

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

Jason Haar wrote: Marc Perkel wrote: Never mind - my fault. I don't think it was spamhaus but a screwed up DNS server. Care to share? I'm a bit concerned a "screwed up" DNS server could cause RBL software to start declaring IP addresses were blacklisted. How did that happen? Kin

RE: False Positives on Spamhaus?

> Getting a ton of false positives today on spamhaus. Generally > they never get it wrong. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? That's a lot of confidence in a system over which you have no control. - Skip

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 27 July 2007, Ed Kasky wrote: At 09:58 AM Friday, 7/27/2007, Gene Heskett wrote -=> On Friday 27 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500 Jul 27 04:26:53 co

Messages not tagged

Hi, I have just installed spamassassin on my computer using this tutorial : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/INSTALL and this section : Installing SpamAssassin for Personal Use (Not System-Wide) I am using Debian Etch. When I send a message to the user gcharhon (me),

Re: BAYES_99 and ham

also sprach Joe Zitnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.26.1340 +0200]: >Bump your BAYES_99 score. Thanks to all who have replied with this suggestion. Of course I am aware of the possibility to raise the scores, but I would not have turned to this list if it would have been sufficient. I agree

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

On Friday 27 July 2007, Ed Kasky wrote: >At 09:58 AM Friday, 7/27/2007, Gene Heskett wrote -=> > >>On Friday 27 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500 >> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: rules: fail

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

On Friday 27 July 2007, Justin Mason wrote: >Gene Heskett writes: >> And I'm still at a loss as to whats fubar. I took the stuff in the >> ImageInfo.cf out that was causeing the error, and restarted spamassassin, >> but its still doing it as of a couple of minutes ago. >> >> If I can't revert this

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

Marc Perkel wrote: > Never mind - my fault. I don't think it was spamhaus but a screwed up > DNS server. Care to share? I'm a bit concerned a "screwed up" DNS server could cause RBL software to start declaring IP addresses were blacklisted. How did that happen? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information S

Re: How to manage spam scores?

whitelist_from[EMAIL PROTECTED] where example is of course yahoo - Original Message - From: Justin Kim To: Spamassassin-user Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:42 PM Subject: How to manage spam scores? Hello Everyone, I am using amavisd-new which uses spamassassin with

How to manage spam scores?

Hello Everyone, I am using amavisd-new which uses spamassassin with postfix+mysql setup. Amavisd-new is scanning messages and is reinjecting messages to postfix through smtp. I would like to know how can I manage spam scores so that certain domain like yahoo.com gets lower score. My user reques

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

Marc Perkel wrote: Getting a ton of false positives today on spamhaus. Generally they never get it wrong. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? Never mind - my fault. I don't think it was spamhaus but a screwed up DNS server.

Re: False Positives on Spamhaus?

Marc Perkel wrote: Getting a ton of false positives today on spamhaus. Generally they never get it wrong. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? I see it on one of my servers trying to send to a fido.ca account (mobile phone account). www.dnsstuff.com and a local lookup says we aren't l

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

At 09:58 AM Friday, 7/27/2007, Gene Heskett wrote -=> On Friday 27 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500 >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, >skipping: >Jul 27 04:26

False Positives on Spamhaus?

Getting a ton of false positives today on spamhaus. Generally they never get it wrong. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me?

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

Gene Heskett writes: > And I'm still at a loss as to whats fubar. I took the stuff in the > ImageInfo.cf out that was causeing the error, and restarted spamassassin, but > its still doing it as of a couple of minutes ago. > > If I can't revert this problem in another hour, I'll see if I can re

Re: upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

On Friday 27 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: >Greetings; > >>From /var/log/maillog: > >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500 >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, >skipping: >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spam

spamc timeouts continued with 3.2.2

I run spamc from SA 3.2.2 on one host, and spamd from SA 3.2.2 on another host. 3.2 was supposed to fix timeouts (* bug 3466: do Bayes expiration, if required, after results have been passed back to the client from spamd; this helps avoid client timeouts.), but a packet capture shows the following

Re: How to create my own test.

On Friday 27 July 2007 15:24:00 Benjamin E. Zeller wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007 14:30:16 McDonald, Dan wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 06:54 -0400, Chuck Payne wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have five servers and it a bit of a pain to have to use webmin to > > > appy the same rules. What I like

Re: How to create my own test.

On Friday 27 July 2007 14:30:16 McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 06:54 -0400, Chuck Payne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have five servers and it a bit of a pain to have to use webmin to > > appy the same rules. What I like to do is create my own dictionary or > > test file, so that I can jus

Re: How to create my own test.

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 06:54 -0400, Chuck Payne wrote: > Hi, > > I have five servers and it a bit of a pain to have to use webmin to > appy the same rules. What I like to do is create my own dictionary or > test file, so that I can just scp it from the box that I have created > and test one. > >

How to create my own test.

Hi, I have five servers and it a bit of a pain to have to use webmin to appy the same rules. What I like to do is create my own dictionary or test file, so that I can just scp it from the box that I have created and test one. If you know link that explain how to that would be really great.

Re: Semi-OT perl question

Thomas Hochstein wrote: John Rudd schrieb: 1) it was installed via CPAN. Anyone know of a good way to uninstall perl modules in general, esp. ones installed via CPAN? Perhaps is helpful? (Not tested.) That does look helpfu

I have a probleme with my content analysis

I'm running on windows and i'm using one software call "NoSpamtoday" that software is based on spamassassin I modify local.cf file but in my test I have this message bellow I put required_hits on 5 but in the message I have 0 so how can I apply my config Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 0

upgraded to 3.2.2, now have errors

Greetings; From /var/log/maillog: Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500 Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, skipping: Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: (Can't locate object method "image_name_

Re: Mail not tagged

> >On 26.07.07 18:54, Guillaume Charhon wrote: > >>I have a problem with spam assassin. I have just followed the tutorial : > >>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/INSTALL > >>(the part Installing SpamAssassin for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)) [...] > >>I am using Debian Et

Re: Mail not tagged

I am the admin, I can do what I want. Do you have some ideas? Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 26.07.07 18:54, Guillaume Charhon wrote: I have a problem with spam assassin. I have just followed the tutorial : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/INSTALL (the part Insta

Re: Mail not tagged

On 26.07.07 18:54, Guillaume Charhon wrote: > I have a problem with spam assassin. I have just followed the tutorial : > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/INSTALL > (the part Installing SpamAssassin for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)) > > But my emails are not tagged :'(

Re: where and how can I add new rule

On 26.07.07 09:19, lochness wrote: > thank for you quick response , I would mean score how to get best score > because all of my spam test have score=1.2 point on required=5 how can > configure that if you have a type file it's possible to send me taht? > juste to see what file I can modify tha

Re: Config Question

Chuck Payne wrote: > * Chuck Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> I got a question... this keeps popping up in my log and I have tried to >> google it, and haven't found an answer on how to fix it. >> >> Jul >> 27 02:49:40 magi spamd[4980]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, >> "

Re: Config Question

> * Chuck Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> I got a question... this keeps popping up in my log and I have tried to >> google it, and haven't found an answer on how to fix it. >> >> Jul >> 27 02:49:40 magi spamd[4980]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, >> "/home/spamd/bayes" is not va

Re: BAYES_99 and ham

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > The downside is, that even if user train much, they'll get _much_ > > of spam hitting only 3.5 points with BAYES_99. On 26.07.07 09:30, John D. Hardin wrote: > There's some reluctance to put Poison Pill rules into the default > distribution

Re: Config Question

* Chuck Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I got a question... this keeps popping up in my log and I have tried to > google it, and haven't found an answer on how to fix it. > > Jul > 27 02:49:40 magi spamd[4980]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, > "/home/spamd/bayes" is not valid for "