Thank you, Meng, for your thoughtful and extensive reply
It looks mighty shiny so far. :) I'll subscribe to the mailing list, too.
And I see Shevek is part of it, too, so it looks all very promising.
I hope the cost of using it won't be too prohibitive, but this looks
at least like exactly w
Jason Bennett wrote:
> Is there a central repository somewhere of custom plugins available for
> SA? I've find a few in the wiki but I was wondering if there was a site
> that had a good selection of them?
>
Well, the wiki has a list 29 of them, which I would consider more than
"a few":
http:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:08:24PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> I've got a PHP script that passes each message in special "Ham" & "Spam"
> folders through SALearn. This script is run via a cron job. The cron
> damon is sending me the following message every time it tries to run my
> script. Wh
I've got a PHP script that passes each message in special "Ham" & "Spam"
folders through SALearn. This script is run via a cron job. The cron
damon is sending me the following message every time it tries to run my
script. What could be causing this?
Thanks.
>
> Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at
> the server with
> scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
> scores of over
> 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
>
> Any help much appreciated.
>
> Chris.
MimeDefang - http:
X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 1.1 with qID lBDNlb6m031347, This
message is to be blocked by code: bkndr63272
Subject: [Spam-Mail] We invite you to join us as a Silver PowerSeller! (This
message should be blocked: bkndr63272)
Shame they didn't just block it so I woudln't have to!
Is there a central repository somewhere of custom plugins available for
SA? I've find a few in the wiki but I was wondering if there was a site
that had a good selection of them?
Thanks!
J
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:04:46 -0500
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duane Hill wrote:
> > I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA
> > will usually skip it and keep running.
> >
>
> Well, it might.. It will essentially start discarding data until it
> can mak
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
>
>> I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
>> mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
>> what I get when checking manually.
>>
>> An example s
Ken Goods wrote:
Spamassassin only scores emails. You'll need another application to "do"
something with them. I use MailScanner and what you need is easily done with
it. It gives you many other options as well. I think Amavis-new and
Mailwatch may do the same thing but have no experience with th
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:27:28PM -0500, Erik Dasque wrote:
> I wish I could do that but I can't find that reference anywhere.
>
> 20_vbounce.cf:# response to mail you really *did* send. See 'perldoc
> VBounce.pm' for more
> 20_vbounce.cf:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce VBounce.
Hmmm,
I wish I could do that but I can't find that reference anywhere.
20_vbounce.cf:# response to mail you really *did* send. See 'perldoc
VBounce.pm' for more
20_vbounce.cf:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce VBounce.pm
20_vbounce.cf:ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::VBounce
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:24:07 +0100
"Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server
> with scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
> scores of over 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject
> title please ?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:14:16AM -0500, Erik Dasque wrote:
> strangely, I am getting this error message, since an upgrade, a few
> months ago:
>
> plugin: failed to parse plugin /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm:
> Can't locate /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm in @INC (@INC
[...]
> I can
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
simscan for qmail can do
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
MailScanner can do that (
Chris wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server
> with scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
> scores of over 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject
> title please ?
>
> Any help much appreciated.
>
> Chris.
Spamassassi
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
Richard Frovarp wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through
our mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does
not ref
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through
our mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not
reflect what I get when che
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kelson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:58:42 -0800
> From: Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adjusting SA scores in 50_scores.cf...
>
> John D. Hardin wrote:
> >score URIBL_SBL 5
> >
> > Discussion of the advisability of a s
On Dec 12, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Mark wrote:
Since rating.cloudmark.com stopped offering their services, I was
wondering
whether someone here knows of another reliable reputation service
like that?
I had such nice SA rules for it, and, now that they're gone, I miss
that
functionality.
My
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not
reflect what I get when checking manually.
An ex
Hi all,
strangely, I am getting this error message, since an upgrade, a few
months ago:
plugin: failed to parse plugin /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm:
Can't locate /etc/mail/spamassassin/VBounce.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux /usr/local/
lib
John D. Hardin wrote:
score URIBL_SBL 5
Discussion of the advisability of a single poison-pill rule is for
another day, though if you *do* want to spamcan everything that hits
SBL you'd be better served doing it at the MTA layer as a regular
DNSBL test.
Also, isn't SBL folded into Zen th
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
X-S
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
> mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
> what I get when checking manually.
>
> An example spam report:
> X-Spam-Status: No, s
I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA will
usually skip it and keep running.
Does the same hold true for extraneous data within the userpref SQL
table? I have a custom Postfix policy and would rather use the existing
userpref table than to create an additional table
Hi,
I have doing some checking of spam messages that make it through our
mail filtering systems and noticed that the spam score does not reflect
what I get when checking manually.
An example spam report:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.068 tagged_above=- required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO
Hello,
Since rating.cloudmark.com stopped offering their services, I was wondering
whether someone here knows of another reliable reputation service like that?
I had such nice SA rules for it, and, now that they're gone, I miss that
functionality.
I still use a somewhat older SA, 3.1.6;
30 matches
Mail list logo
