>>
>>
>> I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
>> running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
>> our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
>> does not get labeled spam. If you send out via a client wit
Cedartech Administrator wrote:
I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
does not get labeled spam. If you send out via
CedarTech Guy:
On Jan 4, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Cedartech Administrator wrote:
I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution.
I am
running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one
of
our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound
e
>
> I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
> running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
> our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
> does not get labeled spam. If you send out via a client with smtp,
Am/On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:46:04 -0600 schrieb/wrote Cedartech Administrator:
>
>I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
>running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
>our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound emai
Loren Wilton wrote:
> There is a standard template that gives the form of the report in the
> mail message. I don't recall which cf file this is normally in, but
> it sounds like that file is not being included in the cf files in your
> configuration.
>
> I would check include paths and possibly p
I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
does not get labeled spam. If you send out via a client with smtp, it
labels 9
[9420] dbg: check: is spam? score=-5.141 required=5 [9420] dbg: check:
tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
How the heck did you get 5+ points with those tests hitting???
Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
Yesterday spamassassin started getting DNS timeouts from the DOB (Day
Old Bread) server at a.support-intelligence.net:
dbg: dns: timeout for URIBL_RHS_DOB, URI-DNSBL,
DNSBL:dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net:akoucq.com after 3 seconds
dbg: dns: timeout for dob, DNSBL-A,
dns:A:80.109.50.74.dob.sib
If someone could run a -D on this email/User_prefs and send me the debug
log, I'll see where in your log whitelist_from_rcvd does something and look
at mine in the same area. It may not help but it would certainly give me a
hint (I hope).
Is there a deeper (more complete messages) version of -D to
It's NATted. I'll add the public versions and see. (Assuming you mean
internal_networks - If you mean local_networks I'll have to do some
research).
Change made:
trusted_networks 74.254.46.133/32 74.254.46.165/32 172.24.0.0/13
207.101.65.90/32
internal_networks 74.254.46.133/32 74.254.46.165/32 1
Dan Barker wrote:
> My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening
> since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
> Just in case there is something [else] I've done silly, my local.cf is at
> http://www.visioncomm.net/temp/080104Local.txt):
Here's what may be a thoroughly stu
ram wrote:
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/dinner.eml.txt
The scam works like this:
They send you a mail asking wether you accept credit cards at your
hotel
They get you to confirm you will accept credit card for payment. Once
you agree they ask you to bill them extra fictional charges for t
Dan Barker wrote:
> Debug http://www.visioncomm.net/temp/080104Debug3.txt.
What is the name of the file that you have your configuration in? Do
you see it in the debug output? Is this it?
[8840] dbg: config: using "C:\Documents and
Settings\dbarker/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user prefs fi
Still no joy.
Prefs:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wachovia.com
whitelist_from_rcvd *wachovia.com wachovia.com
Debug http://www.visioncomm.net/temp/080104Debug3.
I am trying to follow the SLES 10 Mail Scanning Gateway Build Guide as found
off of Novell's website. I am following the instructions and have
everything installed. When I try to run a spam-GTUBE-junk test against
SpamAssassin, at the bottom of the test I receive the following:
(no report templ
Dan Barker wrote:
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com
> gives the same result (ie, nothing in debug nor report).
I think that should work. Try 'spamassassin --lint' to make sure that
there isn't a syntax error in the file somewhere that is preventing
the config
jdow wrote:
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/04/0154229
>
> Points to this article at freep.com
>
> http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080103/NEWS06/80103045/1008/NEWS06
> Mich. spammer, 10 others indicted in alleged pump-and-dump scam
>
>
> {^_^}
I wonder if this
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com
gives the same result (ie, nothing in debug nor report).
Dan
-Original Message-
From: McDonald, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 10:28 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Whit
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:50 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
> Dan McDonald points out that gadental.org has a mismatched rDNS and posits
> that is the reason whitelist_from_rcvd fails.
> So, here is a different email with the same symptom, but with matched rDNS.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig -x 169.200.
Dan McDonald points out that gadental.org has a mismatched rDNS and posits
that is the reason whitelist_from_rcvd fails.
So, here is a different email with the same symptom, but with matched rDNS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig -x 169.200.184.174
174.184.200.169.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR
sls-sn-smt
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:12 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
> My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening
> since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
>
> I don't see anything "interesting" in -D, but I can get it to show an error
> if I mis-spell it whitelist_fxxxrom_rcvd, so I
ram wrote:
> https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/dinner.eml.txt
>
>
>
> The scam works like this:
>
> They send you a mail asking wether you accept credit cards at your
> hotel
>
> They get you to confirm you will accept credit card for payment. Once
> you agree they ask you to bill them extra fictiona
My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening
since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
I don't see anything "interesting" in -D, but I can get it to show an error
if I mis-spell it whitelist_fxxxrom_rcvd, so I know (besides the debug lines
saying so) it's parsing my User_Pr
Rick Zeman wrote:
What could it trigger on?If you take it outside of the context of the
info that you provided that's NOT apparent from that email, it's a
perfectly legitimate email message from a perfectly legit MTA (well, as
legit as hotmail is).
Feed it into Bayes?
--
Anthony Peacock
What could it trigger on?If you take it outside of the context of the
info that you provided that's NOT apparent from that email, it's a
perfectly legitimate email message from a perfectly legit MTA (well, as
legit as hotmail is).
--
Rick Zeman
Director of Information Technology
Melwood
301
Hi, Ram,
2008/1/4, ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/dinner.eml.txt
>
>
>
> The scam works like this:
>
> They send you a mail asking wether you accept credit cards at your
> hotel
>
> They get you to confirm you will accept credit card for payment. Once
> you agree they ask
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/dinner.eml.txt
The scam works like this:
They send you a mail asking wether you accept credit cards at your
hotel
They get you to confirm you will accept credit card for payment. Once
you agree they ask you to bill them extra fictional charges for taxis,
etc on
Sg wrote:
> Hi
> Thanks your reply. Already I went through the site , but we are
> using Linux with Spamassasin. We need to check the newsletter's body
> content only in SA. Please tell me the exact rules in SA for
> spamassassin body content.
There's hundreds of rules for body content used
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 11:53 +, Michael Bartlett wrote:
> Wonder if you could help me, I'm trying to get my procmailrc to move
> all mail marked as spam into another folder - but it doesn't seem to
> work. I understand that this could be a procmail problem - but just
> wanted to confirm that may
Hi
Thanks your reply. Already I went through the site , but we are using
Linux with Spamassasin. We need to check the newsletter's body content only
in SA. Please tell me the exact rules in SA for spamassassin body content.
Thanks
On Jan 4, 2008 2:13 PM, Gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
