[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MK> Call me older fashioned.. I consider line-wrapping a bit too "fancy"
> MK> for my config editing preferences.
>
> I see, you must have a billion column wide terminal or something.
> Oops. You whippersnappers don't call them terminals these days.
> Anyway, I swear I a
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:56 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2008 4:43 p.m.
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: user_prefs: mind the linebreak
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Line wrapping in config is bad. I've had several instances of an editor
in linux that I won't name where I've lost config data because of it
wrapping lines instead of just displaying it off page until I'm ready to
see it.
This seems to happen a lot more frequently with
MK> Call me older fashioned.. I consider line-wrapping a bit too "fancy"
MK> for my config editing preferences.
I see, you must have a billion column wide terminal or something.
Oops. You whippersnappers don't call them terminals these days.
Anyway, I swear I am not dreaming:
$ info make
We spli
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2008 4:43 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: user_prefs: mind the linebreak
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > MK> Why would there ever be a problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MK> Why would there ever be a problem fitting on one line? Lines aren't
MK> limited to 80 characters or anything silly like that..
MK> That sounds a bit like complaining that a ship must fit in the water..
MK> There's a whole ocean out there, so who cares if you can't pu
MK> Why would there ever be a problem fitting on one line? Lines aren't
MK> limited to 80 characters or anything silly like that..
MK> That sounds a bit like complaining that a ship must fit in the water..
MK> There's a whole ocean out there, so who cares if you can't put one
MK> boat in 2 rain pu
Please read the subject as an annoyed, pissed off grunt.
*Edit* ?! Nabble provides a web-frontend, and calls it forum. However,
obviously they don't understand that they are dealing with a mailing
list. It is not a bloody forum.
They just managed to send out two DIFFERENT messages with the very
Tarak Ranjan wrote:
Hi List,
I have one Qmail based MTA , Spamassassin SpamAssassin version
3.1.4 ,running on Perl version 5.8.8,
i want to implement bayesian Filtering site-wide and Auto whitelisting
site-wide..
anyone help me regarding this setup
http://wiki.apache.org/spa
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 15:59 -0800, tmasboa wrote:
> hello, I just got SA set up on my server, and it does not seem to be working
> very well.
>
> Out of about 300 spam messages, only 30 were caught, with many of the false
> -'s receiving scores like 2.x or something.
>
> I have version 3.2.3 and
Agnello George wrote:
Hi
I can tel net port 783 on localhost ... but cant telnet it remotely
...how is that done ...thanks
You can do this using spamd's -i parameter:
From man spamd:
**-i* [/ipaddress/], *--listen-ip*[=/ipaddress/],
*--ip-address*[=/ipaddress/]*
Tells spamd to listen on
hello, I just got SA set up on my server, and it does not seem to be working
very well.
Out of about 300 spam messages, only 30 were caught, with many of the false
-'s receiving scores like 2.x or something.
I have version 3.2.3 and it just doesn't seem to work well at all. I tried
editing local
On Monday 18 February 2008 6:29 am, ram wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 06:14 -0600, Chris wrote:
> > On Monday 18 February 2008 4:33 am, ItsMikeE wrote:
> > > For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> > > "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like to chat
> >
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 13:12 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> Thank you again everyone for responding.
>
> I do have the per user settings and it prompts the question that I don't
> see an answer for yet. What happens with the command
> 'spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist' with per user settin
Tim Alberts wrote:
>
> I do have the per user settings and it prompts the question that I
> don't see an answer for yet. What happens with the command
> 'spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist' with per user settings? I
> assumed running the command as root, it would filter down through each
René Berber wrote:
Tim Alberts wrote:
[snip]
OK, I ran the command and just received another email from the
customer today. The mail is still being marked as spam. I need to
fix this now or stop using spamassassin.
To re-iterate the problem. I am receiving mail from a customer and
it is
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 06:14 -0600, Chris wrote:
>
>
> scoring BOTNET at 5.0 dont you get far too many FP's
> Besides how do you get clamav to score a plain text mail.
> Are you using the clam signatures for spam
Botnet "as is" is way dangerous for an ISP, but for personal defence it works
f
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:51 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > > Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
> > >> Yeah, I'll talk to the Outlook folks, and file a bug against
> > >> Thunderbird... (I think the latter only does it
> -Original Message-
> From: ItsMikeE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 18 February 2008 11:33 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: "Nice girl like to chat" spam
>
>
> For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:12:59AM -0800, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
> use_auto_whitelist 0
Alternately, and the better way, is to disable the AWL plugin. You'll find
the following line in v310.pre (in your site config directory):
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
comment it out and
Tim Alberts wrote:
[snip]
OK, I ran the command and just received another email from the customer
today. The mail is still being marked as spam. I need to fix this now
or stop using spamassassin.
To re-iterate the problem. I am receiving mail from a customer and it
is being marked as spam
I have
use_auto_whitelist 0
in my local.cf.
awl was causing just too much trouble.
--Paul
Tim Alberts wrote:
Tim Alberts wrote:
Rubin Bennett wrote:
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist
(Googled for SpamAssassin AWL remove entry)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
Also man
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:36 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > > We don't want to "only allow" the English locale, because we (here at
> > > my work) do not want our international clients (non Russian) to be
> > > denied email service.
> >
> > ok_locales en ja ko th zh
> >
> > This will allow
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use it
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:51 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >> Yeah, I'll talk to the Outlook folks, and file a bug against
> >> Thunderbird... (I think the latter only does it to be compatible with
> >> the former...)
> >
> > Yeah, good
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:39 -0800, timinator08 wrote:
> Hi, I'm setting up a user with spamassassin but unable to get it working. The
> following is from the maillog when I send a test message to user "green"
> Any suggestions?
This is not a SA question. Your problem is with procmail.
> Feb 18
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
There is an RFC that defines what a URL looks like. A bare domain
doesn't cut it.
You want to forbid bare domains in email? Go ahead. You can forbid
anything you like.
I don't, and I doubt Matt wants to either.
But don't call
RP> Mind the linebreak :-)
That reminds me of this MINOR ITEM,
Currently, each rule or configuration setting must fit on one-line;
multi-line settings are not supported yet.
Hi, I'm setting up a user with spamassassin but unable to get it working. The
following is from the maillog when I send a test message to user "green"
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Feb 18 12:21:37 netmax sendmail[4198]: m1IHLbGR004195: forward
/home/green/.forward.netmax: World writable directory
Feb
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:56 -0600, Rob Wright wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting
> network
> tests run.
>
> spamassassin -D --lint yields this in the plugins section:
The debug switch implies local tests only, *unless* you feed it
2008/2/17, comparity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
> through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the caught
> messages include a bayes score.
>
> I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for th
This rule should be resistant to FPs:
body HC_GIRL/\bnice girl that would like to chat.{1,16}Email
me at \
.{1,32}\.info.{1,120}\bpic(ture)?s\b/
describe HC_GIRLGirl with pics scam
scoreHC_GIRL5
Mind the linebreak :-)
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Tim Alberts wrote:
Rubin Bennett wrote:
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist
(Googled for SpamAssassin AWL remove entry)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
Also man spamassassin should give you some more details about that
command :)
Rubin
yahoo'd - spamassassin auto white
Greetings all.
I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting network
tests run.
spamassassin -D --lint yields this in the plugins section:
[5786] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 from @INC
[5786] dbg: razor2: local tests only, skipping Razor
But
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2008-02-18 11:35
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "Nice girl like to chat" spam
>
>
> I just use in user_prefs
> body J_GIRL /\bgirl.*\bpic(ture)?s\b/
> score J_GIRL 5
While this rule wil
Hmm, let me see. I use the below in user_prefs. Hope that helps.
header J_CHSET3 Subject:raw =~
/\s=\?(windows-(125[0125]|874)|koi8-r|iso-8859-[28])\?/i
score J_CHSET3 5
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
#ok_languages en zh.big5
#http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=569
I just use in user_prefs
body J_GIRL /\bgirl.*\bpic(ture)?s\b/
score J_GIRL 5
On 18.02.08 15:12, Agnello George wrote:
> There is a client requiremt for mails on a windows server to be routed to a
> linux based server ( fedora core 7 ) to sacn for spam mails and
> then re-routed back to the windows based server has any one done
> this before ... and if so h
On 2/18/2008 5:50 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> Eric A. Hall writes:
>> I sometimes get SVN notifications that contain lists of files and their
>> status. The filenames will often get picked up by the URI matching
>> algorithm, each of which end up being processed through numerous lookups
>> (URICOUNT
Hi List,
I have one Qmail based MTA , Spamassassin SpamAssassin version
3.1.4 ,running on Perl version 5.8.8,
i want to implement bayesian Filtering site-wide and Auto whitelisting
site-wide..
anyone help me regarding this setup
/
Tarak Ranjan
On 17.02.08 18:14, tmasboa wrote:
> Hello I need a little bit more help please. I am using webmin and got
> Fetchmail working partially...
I am sorry, but spamassassin list is not the right place for questions like
this. You probably should ask on your OS/distribution support list...
--
Matus UH
The default is to only bind spamd on localhost.
Read the faq, use the man page. It will help you
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
_
This email has been sca
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:34 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on a
> mass scale how old a domain is?
>
The dob list was supposed to do that. I think
Unfortunately their dns servers suddenly have stopped responding
Hi
I can tel net port 783 on localhost ... but cant telnet it remotely ...how
is that done ...thanks
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.com
I would go back to client and ask them WHY.
Sounds like an uneducated client trying to tell the expert(you) how to solve
a problem.
If they just want incoming email from the outside scanned for spam before
sending to a windows server, then so be it.
If they want to use linux, so be it.
If they wan
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 06:14 -0600, Chris wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2008 4:33 am, ItsMikeE wrote:
> > For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> > "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like to chat
> > with you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because
Gentle Bump...
I thought that the approved place to alter scores was in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf so I have not gone rooting around trying
to give these rules scores which surely they should have by default?
Are these new rules? Obsolete rules? Altered rules? Why the sudden
error?
Or have
On Monday 18 February 2008 4:33 am, ItsMikeE wrote:
> For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like to chat
> with you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am using my friend's
> email to write this. To see my
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 02:33 -0800, ItsMikeE wrote:
> For some time now I have been getting spams that look like
> "Hello! I am tired this evening. I am nice girl that would like to chat with
> you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am using my friend's email
> to write this. To see m
Eric A. Hall writes:
> I sometimes get SVN notifications that contain lists of files and their
> status. The filenames will often get picked up by the URI matching
> algorithm, each of which end up being processed through numerous lookups
> (URICOUNTRY, my LDAP filter, etc). Sometimes I get very l
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the
caught messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for the
purposes of learning, and run sa-learn from time
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the
caught messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for the
purposes of learning, and run sa-learn from time
HI
There is a client requiremt for mails on a windows server to be routed to a
linux based server ( fedora core 7 ) to sacn for spam mails and
then re-routed back to the windows based server has any one done
this before ... and if so how is it done ?..
any links would really b
53 matches
Mail list logo
